This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article, IMO, is terribly organized. It gives an account of the primary battle between Ford and Reagan, and then "backtracks" to an absurdly long section that deals almost completely with Maryland Senator Charles Mathias, who wasn't even a candidate (his section is nearly twice as long as the section on the actual battle in the primaries between Ford and Reagan). The section on Mathias also simply repeats a good deal of information that is already contained in the first section in the article. The section on Mathias should be either removed or edited down to reasonable length and added into the first section of the article discussing the primaries. Just a thought. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.145.229.162 (talk) 08:45, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]