This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
I can't seem to make the numbers add up to 80. They only amount to 77 seats won. It says that Reform won 9 seats and United won 7 seats. Which I can't get to make sense. In this article on page 110 it says that Nationals won 17+2 seats. [1]
Then in this Wikipedia article it says "The coalition went into the 1935 election under the title of the "National Political Federation" - [2]
All this is also supported by this chart:
[3]
This is my first comment on Wikipedia.
JurijFedorov (talk) 01:36, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@JurijFedorov: You're right. The table doesn't add up, and it also doesn't match the Electorate results below (I count 7 independents). According to Nohlen's book, the difference is in the United/Reform seats – the book has them at 19 seats, three more than in the results table. My guess is that the three independents who were affiliated with the United/Reform coalition have been omitted from the main results table (which is why there are only four independents listed). As they are listed in the Electorate table as independents, I'll bump them up to 7 in the main table. Number5722:14, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
.JPG)