Jump to content

Talk:? (2011 film)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 18:10, 17 December 2011 (UTC) Hi, I will start this review shortly.[reply]

Review notes
  • This is a very interesting film. I have a few comments below. All in all I see no great problems. I'm really impressed that the sources are archived!
  • I did some copy editing and feel free to change anything you don't agree with.
  • The plot section was very hard to understand and I think it could be expanded just a little for clarity. It was difficult to keep track of who was who. I think a "Cast" section would be helpful for the reader to be able to refer to.
 Done Linked all.
  • "since she converted" - from what
 Done - From Islam. I thought it was implied as her son was Muslim, but no harm in making it clearer.
  • Why is Abi ostracized?
 Done - Because the neighbours disapprove of his mother.
  • "he dies when suicide bombing a church when Menuk rejects him." - don't understand this.
 Done
  • For a person not completely familiar with the relationships among the three religions mentioned, some links or brief explanations would help.
Like a background section?
  • Production
  • Is there any information about the writing of the screenplay?
  • None has been forthcoming online from what I can see. I've been dying to get the DVD if / when it comes out for more background information.
  • Any information about casting choices, where filmed and other production issues?
  • "Its release coincided with a contest sponsored by a local cellular provider to give the best name to the events shown in the film." - I'm not sure what giving "the best name to the events shown in the film" means. What were the results?
  • "Accolades"
  • Is "Accolades" the best title for this section?
  •  Done Changed to awards
  • "As of October 2011, ? is slated to compete in the 2011" - this needs updating, as the results were to be announced November 27.
  •  Done
  • "Controversy"
  • "The youth group Banser, part of NU" - what is NU? What is Banser besides a youth group - what kind of youth group?

Please feel free to contact me and/or ask questions and provide feedback.

MathewTownsend (talk) 21:15, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A few more
  • I don't mean a "background" section on religion, just a little more explanation of how religion and society interact there.
  • e.g. why is Abi ostracized? Isn't being Muslim ok there? Or is it because of his mother being Catholic?
  • Also, when Hendra decides the restaurant will serve exclusively pork, no more is said on that issue. Didn't that have some effects?
  • Surya receives an offer from Rika to play the role of Jesus at her church's Christmas pageant, which he accepts for a high fee after hesitating - does he hesitate because he'll be playing a Christian role? And the "high fee", what is the significance of that? (He's a "ne'er-do-well Muslim actor", so does getting this job make him ok?)
Other things
  • Hendra comes into conflict with Soleh over Menuk, as Hendra had previously dated her. Menuk becomes increasingly depressed after Soleh tells her that he plans to divorce her. - (but then) - Eventually, Soleh joins the Islamic group Nahdlatul Ulama, enabling him to feel more confident; however, after Menuk refuses to take him back ... (I thought he was the one who wanted to divorce her. Did he want the divorce because he lacked self confidence?)
  • Reply - I think just a little more explanation in the plot. Nothing elaborate - just the things I mentioned. Since religious conflict drives the plot, it would help if were clear how it does. I know about the three major religions mentioned, but I don't know how they interact in Indonesia. That's all. MathewTownsend (talk) 00:55, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Perhaps a little too much background. How about:

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: