Jump to content

Southwest LRT

Add links
Route map:
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Southwest LRT
Overview
StatusUnder construction[1]
LocaleHennepin County, Minnesota
Termini
Stations16 planned
Websitemetrocouncil.org/Transportation/Projects/Light-Rail-Projects/METRO-Green-Line-Extension.aspx Edit this at Wikidata
Service
TypeLight rail
SystemMetro Transit
Operator(s)Metro Transit
Daily ridership34,000 (projection)
History
Planned opening2027 (estimated)[2][3]
Technical
Line length14.5 miles (23.3 km)
CharacterSurface
Track gauge4 ft 8+1⁄2 in (1,435 mm) standard gauge
ElectrificationOverhead lines
Route map

Legend
Blue Line and Green Line lines
 Target Field
Northstar line
Bottineau LRT line
 North 7th Street
Royalston Avenue/Farmers Market
Glenwood Avenue
I-94.svg I-94
 Bassett Creek Valley
I-394.svg I-394
Bryn Mawr
West 21st Street
Cedar LakeGrand Rounds National Scenic Byway
 Kenilworth Channel
Tunnel under Kenilworth Trail
West Lake Street
Midtown Greenway
 Beltline Boulevard
ParkingCedar Lake Trail
 MN-100 wide.svg MN 100
Wooddale Avenue
Cedar Lake Trail
 Freight rail underpass
Louisiana Avenue
ParkingCedar Lake Trail
 Louisiana Avenue
Minnehaha Creek
Blake Road
Cedar Lake Trail
 Excelsior Boulevard
US 169.svg US 169
Downtown Hopkins
Cedar Lake Trail
 Shady Oak Road
ParkingSouthwest LRT Trail
 Maintenance Yard
Opus
Parking
 MN-62.svg MN 62
City West
Parking
 US 212.svg US 212
Golden Triangle
Parking
 Nine Mile Creek
Flying Cloud Drive
I-494.svgMN-5.svg I-494 / MN 5
Eden Prairie Town Center
Prairie Center Drive
Southwest
ParkingSouthwest Transit
all stations
accessible
This diagram:

The Southwest LRT (Metro Green Line Extension) is an under–construction 14.5-mile (23.3 km) light rail transit corridor in Hennepin County, Minnesota, with service between Minneapolis and Eden Prairie. The estimated one-way travel time from Southwest Station in Eden Prairie to Target Field Station in Minneapolis is 32 minutes.[4] The Southwest LRT will extend through St. Louis Park, Hopkins and Minnetonka along the route. Major locations on the line will include Bde Maka Ska, Cedar Lake, the Walker Art Center, the Minneapolis Sculpture Garden and Target Field in downtown Minneapolis.

Hennepin County selected the alignment of the route and worked with the Metropolitan Council on environmental impact statements for the project. The Metropolitan Council is managing construction of the route.[5][6] On November 15, 2018, the council accepted an $800 million construction bid by Lunda Construction and C.S. McCrossan, with early construction starting in December 2018.[7] The project has had numerous construction delays, especially at the site of a tunnel near the Kenilworth Trail corridor.

The delays have increased the cost of the project from an estimated $1.3 billion in 2013 to $2.86 billion in 2024 and pushed back the expected opening date first from 2018 to 2023, then to 2027, resulting in criticism of the Metropolitan Council and Hennepin County for mismanagement.[2][8][9][10][11] The Southwest LRT is the most expensive public works project in Minnesota history.[12]

Route

[edit]

The line begins at the Southwest Transit Station in Eden Prairie, passing Eden Prairie's Town Center and crosses US 212 and I-494. It goes into the Golden Triangle, under MN 62, and into Opus. It crosses into Minnetonka on a bridge, and enters the railroad corridor. It turns east into Hopkins, and passes under US 169. It goes east, and has four more stations before entering Minneapolis. It turns north, and enters a tunnel. Upon exiting the tunnel, it has three stations, and passes under I-394 and I-94. It leaves the railroad, enters Royalston, and terminates at Target Field.[13]

History

[edit]

In 1988, the Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority (HCRRA) identified the Southwest transitway from Hopkins to downtown Minneapolis as a future LRT corridor.[14]

In 2002 and 2003, the HCRRA conducted the Southwest Rail Transit Study to evaluate twelve possible light rail routes in the southwest transitway. Of the twelve routes, eight were eliminated and four were selected for further analysis: routes 1A, 2A, 3A and 4A.[14]

On March 4, 2009, the FTA approved a $2 million study of the project, with a then-anticipated opening date in 2015.[15] On May 26, 2010, the Metropolitan Council voted to approve the locally preferred alternative advanced by Hennepin County. The project at that point transferred to Metropolitan Council control and at the time was expected to begin service in 2018.[16] Since receiving approval from the Metropolitan Council on May 26, 2010, the Southwest LRT joins the Bottineau LRT as an official part of the Metro Council's project list. The Metropolitan Council began design work in 2013, after the completion of the draft Environmental Impact Statement.[17]

Route debate

[edit]

Several possible routing variations were evaluated to determine the final routing of the line. There was local debate about the route the line would take between the Chain of Lakes and downtown Minneapolis. Routes 1A and 3A (the chosen route) use the Kenilworth Corridor, a dedicated stretch of right-of-way owned by the HCRRA to be used for future rail transit. Route 3C would have the tracks run much further east through the trench used by the Midtown Greenway before turning north at Nicollet Avenue, where it would have run in a tunnel for part of the way downtown.

On May 26, 2010, the Metropolitan Council approved route 3A as the locally preferred alternative for the line. There was a protracted debate over the route choice in the years leading up to this decision, with many parties strongly opposed to the final route choice. The final choice in favor of 3A was made for several reasons, including its favorable Cost Effectiveness Index (CEI) score and its relatively lower environmental impacts.[18]

Kenilworth alignment (routes 1A, 3A-chosen route)

[edit]

The Kenilworth Corridor was acquired by the HCRRA to preserve it for future rail transit. The Kenilworth routing would have provided shorter ride times for the majority of the line's users compared to the 3C routing. It is also less expensive to build and operate.[citation needed]

Supporters of a network alignment propose that a streetcar or trolley line be installed alongside the Midtown Greenway to connect the Southwest LRT line to the existing Blue Line; however, this will not occur. Rather LRT will be used for the full stretch of the line. The Midtown Greenway Coalition has long supported and promoted the network alignment. The group successfully prevented the trench from being used for a busway and instead pitched the idea of the trench being used for a potential streetcar line.

Some residents living adjacent to the Kenilworth Corridor favored the 3C route because they were concerned about the noise and disturbance of the trains passing through the corridor near their homes. The Kenilworth Corridor presently contains an active freight rail line and the light rail will be in addition to this existing track. Operating the two LRT tracks adjacent to the Twin Cities & Western Railroad line (four freight trains each day) will require Metro Transit to purchase a standard $300 Million insurance policy holding the railroad harmless for any accidents caused by derailments of freight or LRT trains. The annual premium cost of this policy is approximately $1.5 Million.

Members of Southwest Policy Advisory Committee allege that the chair of the committee, Hennepin County commissioner Gail Dorfman, refused to allow debate over concerns with the Kenilworth Corridor alignment. They also allege that County planners manipulated cost benefit calculations of the different route options to lead to preference for the Kenilworth alignment.[19]

Greenway/Nicollet alignment (route 3C)

[edit]

Advocates of the 3C route wanted the line to directly serve Uptown and Eat Street, and feel that routing the line through the Kenilworth Corridor would be a missed opportunity for increased ridership and better transit in this area of Minneapolis.

Some Eat Street business owners were concerned that the access and traffic problems resulting from the construction period on Nicollet Avenue would severely affect their business. Engineers indicated Nicollet Avenue may have been tunneled instead of at-grade.

In early 2008, Hennepin County Medical Center acquired a city block parcel at 28th Street and Nicollet where the 3C Route would turn from the Midtown Greenway trench onto or under Nicollet Avenue.[20] HCMC built a clinic on the site that does not incorporate a light rail station or easement into the building. That would have prevented the 3C route from turning at this location since there is not enough space for tracks to make the minimum required turning radius.

Neighborhood positions

[edit]

During public input phases in 2007–2008 the final three proposed routes faced opposition by some members of two Minneapolis neighborhoods, Kenwood and Whittier. Kenwood's neighborhood organization released an official neighborhood stance against the line with Whittier's organization debating to release a stance. In Kenwood, one of the wealthiest neighborhoods, their criticism involves disruption to natural parkland and noise though the Kenilworth Corridor (which routes '1A' and '3A' would run on). The corridor is home to the Kenilworth Trail, a scenic bike and pedestrian trail that runs adjacent to a rarely used freight rail line.[21] In Whittier, disruption to Nicollet Avenue by the '3C' route had brought concern to business owners regarding Eat Street as a business, restaurant and retail corridor of the Whittier neighborhood.[22]

The Bryn Mawr neighborhood has favored the routes moving through the Kenilworth Corridor as it supports their redevelopment plans. Also, suburban cities have received the proposals favorably with concern over routing within their cities than opposition of the line itself. The 3A route through job centers in Eden Prairie garnered approval from its City Council. Hopkins also proposed routing the line through their downtown Main Street, but it will instead be routed nearby.[23]

Funding and delays

[edit]

In April 2015, the council released an updated analysis of the project, with projected costs raised by more than $300 million to $1.994 billion, largely as a result of additional sitework and ground preparation due to poor soil along the route.[17] The expected opening date of the line was also pushed back to 2020, as a result of delays to the next draft of the Environmental Impact Statement, which was expected to be released in May 2015, more than a year after the original planned release in January 2014.[17] To bring costs within the original budget, Metropolitan Council members proposed measures such as eliminating the Mitchell Road station in Eden Prairie or decreasing the size of the Hopkins maintenance facility.[24]

A reduced $1.744 billion budget for the line was approved by the Metropolitan Council in July 2015. Changes from the original plan included the deletion of the Mitchell Road terminus, removal of planned station art, and the deferral of the Eden Prairie Town Center station.[25]

On May 22, 2016, the Minnesota Legislature was unable to agree on whether to fund the State of Minnesota's 10% portion of the project. On August 31, 2016, the State's 10% portion ($144.5 million) was funded by Certificates of Participation by three government bodies: the Metropolitan Council ($103.5 million),the Counties Transit Improvement Board ($20.5 million) and Hennepin County ($20.5 million) to close the $144.5 million gap. [26]

On February 15, 2017, the Metropolitan Council announced that the Southwest LRT design and engineering phase would be complete at the end of 2017.[27] As of late February 2022 work at the Kenilworth tunnel had been stopped since January that year due to damage to a neighboring condominium.[28][29] In mid-April 2022, after inspecting the damage to the condo, engineers cleared the tunnel work to resume.[30] In March 2023, however, condominium owners at the affected building reported that damage related to light rail construction was worsening, to which the Metropolitan Council replied that the condo owners association had not filed any claims related to new damage.[31]

In March 2023, the Minnesota Office of the Legislative Auditor reported that in planning construction for the Southwest LRT, the Metropolitan Council obligated funds that it did not have and failed to develop a contingency plan if the required project funding did not materialize. The Metropolitan Council had solicited bids for civil construction with project specifications it knew to be incomplete. After bidding was completed, the Metropolitan Council's addition of substantial new or changed work resulted in delays and increased costs. Legislative Auditor Judy Randall noted that the Metropolitan Council was less cooperative than most state agencies they audited, and criticized their lack of transparency in communicating problems related to the Southwest LRT to the public.[8][32]

In January 2024, a whistleblower engineer working for the Metropolitan Council sued the agency alleging fraud and mismanagement related to multiple change orders.[33] In March 2024, a local resident identified poor workmanship on track lines. Safety regulations require 25 feet of separation between light rail track placement and freight tracks, but the light rail tracks were placed with only 24 feet of separation.[34]

The delays and cost overruns of the Southwest Light Rail line renewed calls to reform the Metropolitan Council, resulting a state legislative task force and a law passed in giving the Minnesota Department of Transportation more oversight of future transit projects.[35][36]

Construction

[edit]
On an overcast day, two cranes and several other construction vehicles work in a mostly empty worksite between some one-story buildings, a road, and a lake.
Work underway in 2019 on the SouthWest station, part of the extended Green Line to Eden Prairie
Southwest LRT construction from Royalston Ave towards Cedar Lake Trail and Glenwood Avenue - August 2022

Construction bids were revealed publicly on August 15, 2017[37] but were rejected for being too costly and non-responsive (Bids did not meet the requirements).[38] As of May 2018, the Metropolitan Council estimated the building costs to be at $2.003 billion.[39] On November 15, 2018, the Council accepted an $800 million construction bid for a section of the construction by Lunda Construction and C.S. McCrossan.[7]

In 2018 construction of the line was the State of Minnesota's largest public works project and is happening in all five cities to be served by the line is. The project is known to disrupt major trails such as the Cedar Lake LRT Regional Trail and the Kenilworth Trail.[40] The line was expected to be completed in 2023, but unexpected poor soils in the Kenilworth Corridor have delayed the opening.[41][42] In July 2021 the Metropolitan Council did not have a date when the line will be completed or how delays will affect project cost. In a private call with government stakeholders, the Metropolitan Council expected a delay of at least two years, pushing a late 2025 opening at the earliest.[43] Construction contractors will use alternate construction methods for the portion with poor soils.[44] In January 2022 Metropolitan Council officials changed the expected opening to 2027 with increased costs between $450 and $550 million expected.[2]

Initial construction began in late 2018 with brush removal, and heavy construction of the line began in 2019. The project reached its 25% completion milestone in August 2020 and a 50% completion in July 2021.[45][43]

Rolling stock

[edit]
Metro Transit Type III LRV interior

In 2016, the Metropolitan Council reserved $118 million to Siemens to build a fleet of 27 vehicles for the Southwest LRT.[46] An order for these 27 Siemens S700 vehicles was placed in October 2016.[47]

These used a modified center-truck design that allowed sideways-facing seating in the center section,[48] for better passenger flow.[49] In 2018, Siemens adopted a new model number, S700, for S70 LRVs that used the new center-section design, and in 2020 it retroactively applied the new designation to all previous S70 LRVs built to the new design; as a result, all of Metro Transit's type III LRVs (301–327) are now Siemens model S700.[49][50] The first two of 27 Siemens S700 light rail vehicles ordered for the project were delivered to Metro Transit on May 21, 2020.[51][52]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Federal, state and local officials break ground on Southwest LRT". Metropolitan Council. November 30, 2018. Retrieved December 5, 2018.
  2. ^ a b c Moore, Janet (January 26, 2022). "Southwest LRT now expected to cost up to $2.75B, open in 2027". Star Tribune. Retrieved January 29, 2022.
  3. ^ "Federal Transit Administration Propels Southwest LRT Project Forward With Approval To Enter Engineering". Metropolitan Council. December 21, 2016. Archived from the original on February 14, 2017. Retrieved February 13, 2017.
  4. ^ "Travel Demand Methodology & Forecast". Metropolitan Council. February 2016. Retrieved December 5, 2018.
  5. ^ "Light Rail and Commuter Transit - Minnesota Issues Resources Guides". www.lrl.mn.gov. Minnesota Legislative Reference Library. October 2020. Retrieved June 17, 2022.
  6. ^ Platt, Adam (February 4, 2022). "Difficult questions remain about how the Southwest light rail project will be completed". MinnPost. Retrieved June 17, 2022.
  7. ^ a b Moylan, Martin (November 15, 2018). "Met Council approves Lunda/McCrossan's $800M bid for light rail project". MPR News. Retrieved November 15, 2018.
  8. ^ a b "Met Council wasn't transparent about Southwest light rail cost overruns, delays, legislative auditor says". Star Tribune. March 15, 2023.
  9. ^ Brimeyer, Jim; Sanger, Sue (May 15, 2023). "Counterpoint: Wrong route was the root of rail line woes". The Star Tribune. Retrieved June 28, 2024.
  10. ^ Nelson, Tim (May 16, 2018). "Building costs push Southwest light rail price tag above $2 billion". Retrieved July 27, 2024.
  11. ^ Kolls, Jay (January 8, 2024). "Met Council puts revised budget for Southwest Light Rail at $2.86 billion". Retrieved July 27, 2024.
  12. ^ Moore, Janet. "New underground 'impediment' discovered during Southwest LRT construction". Star Tribune. Retrieved February 17, 2023.
  13. ^ "Route and Stations". Metropolitan Council. Retrieved January 28, 2023.
  14. ^ a b Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority. "Southwest Transitway Alternatives Analysis Final Report (Chapter 1 – Intro)". Retrieved October 28, 2009.
  15. ^ Blake, Laurie (March 5, 2009). "Transit Agency to Study Rail Plan". StarTribune. Retrieved December 17, 2009.
  16. ^ "Southwest LRT Timeline". Southwest Transitway. Metropolitan Council. 2012. Retrieved September 4, 2012.
  17. ^ a b c "Delays increase costs for Twin Cities light rail project". Trains Magazine. April 28, 2015. Retrieved April 29, 2015.
  18. ^ "Council Approves Light Rail Along the Southwest Corridor". Metropolitan Council. May 26, 2010. Retrieved June 30, 2010.
  19. ^ Brimeyer, Jim; Sanger, Sue (May 15, 2023). "Counterpoint: Wrong route was the root of rail line woes". The Star Tribune. Retrieved June 28, 2024.
  20. ^ Dylan Thomas (May 5, 2008). "HCMC Clinic on the move". Southwest Journal. Retrieved May 7, 2008.
  21. ^ Kenwood Isles Area Association (March 2007). "Kenwood Newsletter". Archived from the original on October 19, 2007. Retrieved January 26, 2008.
  22. ^ Eric James (2007–2008). "Whittier Alliance, Community Meeting Minutes". Whittier Alliance.
  23. ^ Jenna Ross (January 17, 2008). "Dreams sprout along southwest rail route". Star Tribune.
  24. ^ Moore, Janet (May 7, 2015). "Transit board and others urge restraint in Southwest light-rail price tag". Minneapolis Star-Tribune. Retrieved May 10, 2015.
  25. ^ Callaghan, Peter (July 9, 2015). "Met Council approves revamped Southwest LRT funding plan". MinnPost. Retrieved July 13, 2015.
  26. ^ Dexter, Patty (September 7, 2016). "Boards OK plans to fill Southwest LRT funding gap". Lakeshore Weekly News. Wayzata, MN. Retrieved September 14, 2016.
  27. ^ Metropolitan Council. "Southwest LRT Current Projects". Metropolitan Council. Retrieved April 16, 2017.
  28. ^ Keith, Theo (February 21, 2022). "'One continuous problem': SWLRT construction causes cracking, flooding at nearby condo building". KMSP.
  29. ^ Kolls, Jay (February 21, 2022). "Minneapolis condo parking garage flooded, association blames SWLRT construction". KSTP-TV.
  30. ^ Rasmussen, Eric (April 12, 2022). "Engineers give go-ahead to resume light rail construction near damaged condos". KSTP-TV.
  31. ^ Rasmussen, Eric (March 15, 2023). "Condo owners report worsening damage along 'pinch point' for light rail construction". KSTP-TV.
  32. ^ "Southwest Light Rail Transit Construction: Metropolitan Council Decision Making" (PDF). State of Minnesota, Office of the Legislative Auditor. March 15, 2023.
  33. ^ Moore, Janet (January 24, 2024). "Met Council engineer sues his employer, saying it illegally inflated cost of Southwest LRT". The Star Tribune. Retrieved June 28, 2024.
  34. ^ Rasmussen, Eric. "New problem uncovered on notorious 'pinch point' for Southwest Light Rail". KSTP-TV. Retrieved June 28, 2024.
  35. ^ Adler, Erin (February 1, 2024). "Group tasked with reforming Met Council offers lawmakers six options". The Star Tribune. Retrieved July 3, 2024.
  36. ^ Moore, Janet (May 29, 2024). "Lawmakers frustrated by delays, cost overruns enlist MnDOT on light-rail project". The Star Tribune. Retrieved July 3, 2024.
  37. ^ Sepic, Matt (August 16, 2017). "Southwest light rail project moves closer to a big construction contract". MPR News. Retrieved August 16, 2017.
  38. ^ Nelson, Tim (September 11, 2017). "Met Council rejects all Southwest light rail bids as too costly". MPR News.
  39. ^ Nelson, Tim (May 16, 2018). "Building costs push Southwest light rail price tag above $2 billion". MPR News.
  40. ^ Moore, Janet (November 16, 2018). "Metropolitan Council picks contractor to build $2 billion Southwest light rail". Star Tribune. Retrieved November 26, 2018.
  41. ^ "METRO Green Line Extension". Metropolitan Council. Archived from the original on November 28, 2021. Retrieved December 11, 2020.
  42. ^ "Soil issue in Kenilworth corridor to delay Southwest LRT, 2023 opening". Sun Sailor. Hometown Source. January 14, 2021. Retrieved January 14, 2021.
  43. ^ a b Platt, Adam (July 15, 2021). "Southwest LRT's Rocky Mess". Twin Cities Business. Retrieved July 15, 2021.
  44. ^ Moore, Janet (January 14, 2021). "Opening of Southwest light rail delayed due to construction challenges". Star Tribune. Retrieved January 14, 2021.
  45. ^ Callaghan, Peter (August 26, 2020). "Southwest light rail, a project left for dead (more than once), is 25 percent complete". MinnPost. Retrieved July 16, 2021.
  46. ^ Bitters, Janice (October 27, 2016). "Siemens lands $118M contract for Southwest LRT". Finance&Commerce.
  47. ^ "Twin Cities' Metropolitan Council Chooses Siemens to Provide New Light Rail Vehicles". Mass Transit. October 28, 2016. Retrieved November 14, 2020.
  48. ^ "Southwest LRT Project Update". Metropolitan Council. May 13, 2020. p. 6. Retrieved November 14, 2020.
  49. ^ a b "Siemens rebadges North American low-floor cars". Tramways & Urban Transit. No. 993. UK: Mainspring Enterprises Ltd. September 2020. p. 336. ISSN 1460-8324.
  50. ^ "Worldwide Review [regular news section]". Tramways & Urban Transit. No. 994. UK: Mainspring Enterprises Ltd. October 2020. p. 402. ISSN 1460-8324.
  51. ^ McKinney, Kevin (2020). "Rush Hour [transit news section]". Passenger Train Journal. Vol. 44, no. 3 – Third quarter 2020. White River Productions, Inc. p. 52. ISSN 0160-6913.
  52. ^ Moore, Janet (May 22, 2020). "New Southwest light-rail train cars arrive". Star Tribune. Retrieved July 16, 2021.
[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Southwest LRT.
KML file (edit • help)
Template:Attached KML/Southwest LRT
KML is not from Wikidata
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Southwest_LRT&oldid=1257119427"