Jump to content

Sinhala Only Act

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Sinhala Only Bill)

Official Language Act
Parliament of Ceylon
  • An act to prescribe the Sinhala language as the one official language of Ceylon and to enable certain transitory provisions to be made.
CitationNo. 33 of 1956
Territorial extentCeylon
Enacted byParliament of Ceylon
Commenced7 July 1956
Amended by
Tamil Language (Special Provisions) Act (No. 28 of 1958)
Related legislation
Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution of Sri Lanka
Part of a series on
Sri Lankan Tamils
Ancient era
Middle Ages
Colonial
Post independence
Civil war

The Official Language Act (No. 33 of 1956), commonly referred to as the Sinhala Only Act, was an act passed in the Parliament of Ceylon in 1956.[1] The act replaced English with Sinhala as the sole official language of Ceylon, with the exclusion of Tamil from the act.

At the time, Sinhala (also known as Sinhalese) was the language of Ceylon's majority Sinhalese people, who accounted for around 70% of the country's population.[2] Tamil was the first language of Ceylon's three largest minority ethnic groups, the Indian Tamils, Sri Lankan Tamils and Moors, who together accounted for around 29% of the country's population.[2]

The act was controversial as supporters of the act saw it as an attempt by a community that had just gained independence to distance themselves from their colonial masters, while its opponents viewed it as an attempt by the linguistic majority to oppress and assert dominance on minorities. The Act symbolizes the post independent Sinhalese majority's determination to assert Ceylon's identity as a Sinhala Buddhist nation state, and for Tamils, it became a symbol of minority oppression and a justification for them to demand a separate nation-state, Tamil Eelam, which was a factor in the emergence of the decades-long Sri Lankan Civil War.[3]

British rule

[edit]

During the British colonial era, English was the official language in Ceylon (known as Sri Lanka since 1972). Until the passage of the Free Education Bill in 1944, education in the English language was the preserve of the Sri Lankan elite and the ordinary people had little knowledge of it. A disproportionate number of English language schools were established in Jaffna by the American Ceylon Mission, which provided English-language skills for the Tamil population in Jaffna.[4][5] Thus, English-speaking Tamils held a higher percentage of coveted Ceylon Civil Service jobs, which required English fluency, than their share of the island's population.

After their election to the State Council of Ceylon in 1936, the Lanka Sama Samaja Party (LSSP) members N. M. Perera and Philip Gunawardena demanded the replacement of English as the official language by Sinhala and Tamil. In November 1936, a motion that "in the Municipal and Police Courts of the Island the proceedings should be in the vernacular" and that "entries in police stations should be recorded in the language in which they are originally stated" were passed by the State Council and referred to the legal secretary.[citation needed]

In the 1940s, Sinhala political leaders were willing to support both Sinhala and Tamil as the official languages. For example, in 1944, both J. R. Jayewardene and S. W. R. D. Bandaranaike supported both languages getting official status, with Bandaranaike saying that he had "no personal objections to both languages being considered official languages, nor do I see any particular harm of danger or difficulty from this."[6]

However, nothing was done about these matters, and English continued to be the language of rule until 1956.[citation needed]

Ceylon after independence

[edit]
Prime Minister S. W. R. D. Bandaranayaka.

Ceylon was granted the status of dominion in the British Empire in 1948 after largely non-violent independence movement, with the transition of sovereignty from Britain to the Sri Lankans being a peaceful process. For the first years of independence, there was an attempt to balance the interests of the elites of the main communities: the Sinhalese and the Tamils.[citation needed] In 1949, at the behest of the foreign plantation owners, the government disenfranchised the Indian Tamil plantation workers, who accounted for 12% of the population.[7][8]

In 1951, the ambitious Solomon Bandaranaike broke with his party, the conservative United National Party (UNP), and created a new centrist party, the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP). By 1953, the proposal for the use of Sinhala and Tamil as official languages was replaced by the chauvinist cry for 'Sinhala only', and the argument that Sinhala would be 'swamped' by Tamil. Arguments were made that 'Sinhala only' would give better opportunities for the Sinhalese.[6] By 1956, 50% of clerical jobs were held by Tamils, although they were a minority of the country's population.[9]

In 1955, the SLFP decided to break ranks with the general consensus on the left to have both Sinhala and Tamil as official languages to campaign on the slogan "Sinhala Only".[10]

Enactment

[edit]
Fast unto death by Prof. F. R. Jayasuriya in 1956, to force Bandaranaike government to implement the Sinhala as the only State language excluding Tamil language of masses in the country's north and east provinces.

In the 1956 general elections, the SLFP campaigned on largely nationalist policies, and made the language policy one of their key election promises. The result was a landslide electoral victory for the SLFP lead coalition Mahajana Eksath Peramuna, which paved the way for Bandaranaike's appointment as Prime Minister. The Sinhala nationalist demanded that their new government immediately implement promise to make Sinhala the official state language. When Bandaranaike proceed to make Sinhala the official state language with administrative provisions for Tamil, K. M. P. Rajaratne and Professor J. E. Jayasuriya went on a fast unto death demanded legislation be drafted to make Sinhala the only official state with no concessions to Tamil language. This forced Bandaranaike to drop the administrative provisions for Tamil and The Ceylon (Constitution) Order in Council or Sinhala Only Bill as it was known was passed through parliament and was enacted. The bill was passed with the SLFP and the UNP supporting it, with the leftist LSSP and Communist Party of Sri Lanka as well as the Tamil nationalist parties (Illankai Tamil Arasu Kachchi and All Ceylon Tamil Congress) opposing it.[11][12]

Tamil and Sinhalese opposition to the Act

[edit]

The left bitterly opposed the Act, with N. M. Perera, leader of the LSSP, moving a motion in Parliament that it "should be amended forthwith to provide for the Sinhala and Tamil languages to be state languages of Ceylon with parity of status throughout the Island."[13]

Colvin R. de Silva of the LSSP famously argued against the Act:[14]

Do we want an independent Ceylon or two bleeding halves of Ceylon...? These are issues that in fact we have been discussing under the form and appearance of the language issue…One language, two nations; Two languages, one Nation…

The passage of the act was met with demonstrations from Tamils led by the Federal Party who organized a satyagraha outside the parliament building. In response, the Sinhalese nationalist group Eksath Bhikkhu Peramuna organized a counter-protest; a mob representing this group attacked the Tamil protesters and was "responsible for unleashing riots that killed nearly 150 Tamils" in the Gal Oya riots between 5 and 6 June 1956.[15]

Bandaranaike stated in parliament on 6 June 1956 that Sinhalese people saw parity between Sinhala and Tamil as official languages as being "gravely detrimental to the continuance and progress of the Sinhala language; that it would almost imply the extinction of the Sinhala language."[6]

Tamil Language (Special Provisions) Act

[edit]

In order to assuage Tamil feelings following the anti-Tamil riots in 1958, Prime Minister Bandaranaike passed the Tamil Language (Special Provisions) Act, No. 28 of 1958 in August that year. The bill allowed for the use of Tamil as a medium of instruction in schools and universities, as a medium of examination for admission into public service (with the proviso requiring Sinhala fluency within certain time period), for official correspondence and administrative purposes in the Northern and Eastern provinces.[16][17] However, following the assassination of Bandaranaike the next year by a Buddhist monk over alleged racial betrayal, the regulations needed to implement the bill would not be submitted for parliamentary approval for another eight years.[18] Starting from January 1961, the new government led by Bandaranaike's widow Sirimavo sought to forcefully implement the Sinhala Only Act and, under Sinhalese nationalist pressure, enacted the Language of the Courts Act No. 3 of 1961 to make Sinhala the only language of the courts, while ignoring the Tamil Language (Special Provisions) Act.[19] Although the regulations for implementing the bill were approved in January 1966 under Dudley Senanayake, it would be relegated to a "subordinate legislation" with the adoption of the Republican Constitution in 1972 under Mrs Bandaranaike which consolidated the 'Sinhala-only' policy, thus affirming the subordinate status of the Tamil language:[18]

"the Tamils felt indignant that it was specifically stated in the constitution that the provisions relating to the Tamil language could be amended by ordinary legislation whereas the provisions relating to the Sinhalese were constitutionally entrenched."

Effect

[edit]

The policy turned out to be "severely discriminatory" and placed the Tamil-speaking population at a "serious disadvantage".[20] As a Sinhalese academic A. M. Navaratna Bandara writes: "The Tamil-speaking people were given no option but to learn the language of the majority if they wanted to get public service employment. [...] A large number of Tamil public servants had to accept compulsory retirement because of their inability to prove proficiency in the official language [....]"[21] It also entailed that a Sinhalese officer working in Tamil areas was exempted from learning Tamil, but a Tamil officer working in even Tamil areas had to learn Sinhala.[22] The effects of these policies were dramatic as shown by the drastic drop of Tamil representation in public sector: "In 1956, 30 percent of the Ceylon administrative service, 50 percent of the clerical service, 60 percent of engineers and doctors, and 40 percent of the armed forces were Tamil. By 1970 those numbers had plummeted to 5 percent, 5 percent, 10 percent, and 1 percent, respectively."[23] For much of the 1960s government forms and services were virtually unavailable to Tamils, and this situation only partly improved with later relaxations of the law.[24]

Languages today

[edit]

Following pressure from the Indian government in 1987,[25] the Thirteenth amendment to the Constitution was passed, which stated that, "the official language of Sri Lanka is Sinhala" while "Tamil shall also be an official language," with English as a "link language."[1][26] However, in practice, predominantly Sinhala-speaking police officers who are not fluent in Tamil are stationed in Tamil areas, posing practical challenges for the locals when interacting with the authorities.[27]

Further reading

[edit]
  • Sandagomi Coperahewa, Bhashanuragaye Desapalanya (Colombo: Godage, 1999)

References

[edit]
Wikisource has original text related to this article:
  1. ^ a b Sri Lanka Consolidated Acts
  2. ^ a b "Population by ethnic group, census years" (PDF). Statistical Abstract 2010. Department of Census & Statistics. Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 November 2011.
  3. ^ Philips, Rajan. "NAVIGATE:Home » » 60 years after June 5, 1956:The making, unmaking and the difficult remaking of a nation 60 years after June 5, 1956:The making, unmaking and the difficult remaking of a nation". Island.lk. Retrieved 14 February 2020.
  4. ^ "Welcome to UTHRJ".
  5. ^ Mendis, G. C. , The causes of communal conflict in Ceylon (1943) http://dlib.pdn.ac.lk/handle/123456789/1109
  6. ^ a b c Jayawardena, Kumari (1987). "From Sinhala only to ethnic violence". In Ali, Asghar (ed.). Ethnic conflict in south Asia. Ajanta Publications. pp. 173–188. ISBN 9788120201798.
  7. ^ "Missed Opportunities and the Loss of Democracy".
  8. ^ "Plantation Tamils deprived of vote and citizenship, 1948/50".
  9. ^ Neil DeVotta, Ethnolinguistic Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict in Sri Lanka, p73
  10. ^ Brown, Michael Edward; Ganguly, Sumit (2003). Fighting Words: Language Policy and Ethnic Relations in Asia. MIT Press. p. 119. ISBN 978-0-262-52333-2.
  11. ^ De Silva, K. M., & Wriggins, W. H. (1988). J. R. Jayewardene of Sri Lanka: a political biography.
  12. ^ Krishnamurthi, J. "History of 'Fasts-unto-death'". Daily News. Retrieved 9 May 2023.
  13. ^ Neil DeVotta (2004). Blowback: Linguistic Nationalism, Institutional Decay, and Ethnic Conflict in Sri Lanka. Stanford University Press. p. 57. ISBN 9780804749244.
  14. ^ Perera, K. K. S. "Colvin the fighter". Daily News. Retrieved 24 July 2024.
  15. ^ Brown, Michael Edward, ed. (1 January 2003). Fighting Words: Language Policy and Ethnic Relations in Asia. MIT Press. p. 124. ISBN 9780262523332.
  16. ^ Ghosh, P. A. (1999). Ethnic Conflict in Sri Lanka and Role of Indian Peace Keeping Force (IPKF). APH Publishing. p. 36. ISBN 978-81-7648-107-6.
  17. ^ DeVotta, Neil (2004). Blowback: Linguistic Nationalism, Institutional Decay, and Ethnic Conflict in Sri Lanka. Stanford University Press. pp. 119, 125. ISBN 978-0-8047-4924-4.
  18. ^ a b Coperahewa, Sandagomi (2 June 2009). "The language planning situation in Sri Lanka". Current Issues in Language Planning. 10 (1): 117–119.
  19. ^ DeVotta, Neil (2003). "Ethnolinguistic Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict in Sri Lanka". Fighting Words: Language Policy and Ethnic Relations in Asia. MIT Press. p. 129. ISBN 978-0-262-52333-2.
  20. ^ Deegalle, Mahinda (27 September 2006). Deegalle, Mahinda (ed.). Buddhism, Conflict and Violence in Modern Sri Lanka. Routledge. p. 183. ISBN 9781134241880.
  21. ^ Nubin, Walter, ed. (1 January 2002). Sri Lanka: Current Issues and Historical Background. Nova Publishers. p. 63. ISBN 9781590335734.
  22. ^ Hoole, Rajan (22 July 2016). "'Sinhala Only' & Its Effects On Ceylon's Legal Tradition". Colombo Telegraph. Retrieved 13 February 2024.
  23. ^ Brown, Michael Edward, ed. (1 January 2003). Fighting Words: Language Policy and Ethnic Relations in Asia. MIT Press. p. 129. ISBN 9780262523332.
  24. ^ Terminate Genocide
  25. ^ Indo-Lanka Accord, Colombo, 29 July 1987 https://peacemaker.un.org/sites/peacemaker.un.org/files/IN%20LK_870729_Indo-Lanka%20Accord.pdf
  26. ^ Martyn, Sabina (17 January 2013). "In Post-Conflict Sri Lanka, Language is Essential for Reconciliation". asiafoundation.org. he Asia Foundation. Retrieved 14 February 2020.
  27. ^ "Linguistic slights spur ethnic division in Sri Lanka". The Economist. 2 March 2017. Retrieved 13 February 2024.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sinhala_Only_Act&oldid=1253416412"