Jump to content

Sex-positive movement

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Sex-negativity)

"Sex positive" redirects here. For other uses, see Sex Positive (disambiguation).
A sex positive poster in Amsterdam (2021)

The sex-positive movement is a social and philosophical movement that seeks to change cultural attitudes and norms around sexuality, promoting the recognition of sexuality (in the countless forms of expression) as a natural and healthy part of the human experience and emphasizing the importance of personal sovereignty, safer sex practices, and consensual sex (free from violence or coercion). It covers every aspect of sexual identity including gender expression, orientation, relationship to the body (body-positivity, nudity, choice), relationship-style choice, and reproductive rights.[1][unreliable source?][2] Sex-positivity is "an attitude towards human sexuality that regards all consensual sexual activities as fundamentally healthy and pleasurable, encouraging sexual pleasure and experimentation."[1] It challenges societal taboos and aims to promote healthy and consensual sexual activities.[3] The sex-positive movement also advocates for comprehensive sex education and safe sex as part of its campaign.[4][1] The movement generally makes no moral distinctions among types of sexual activities, regarding these choices as matters of personal preference.[5]

Overview

[edit]

The terms and concepts of sex-positive (German: sexuell positiv) (or, alternately sex-affirmative (sexuell bejahend)) and sex-negative (sexuell negativ) are generally attributed to Wilhelm Reich. His hypothesis was that some societies view the sexual expression as essentially good and healthy, while others have a generally negative view of sexuality and seek to repress and control libido.[6] Other terms used to describe this concept include pro-sex or pro-sexuality.[6][7]

The sex-positive movement does not, in general, make moral or ethical distinctions between heterosexual or homosexual sex, or masturbation, regarding these choices as matters of personal preference.[8] Other sex-positive positions include acceptance of BDSM and polyamory as well as asexuality.[8]

Some sex-positive theorists have analyzed sex-positivity in terms of the intersection of race/culture, gender, sexuality, class, nationality, and spirituality.[8] Because of the vastness of the sex-positivity movement, it has been challenging for people to reach an agreed-upon definition of the term "sex-positivity".[8] Several definitions of sex-positivity have been offered by sexologist Carol Queen:

Sex-positive, a term that's coming into cultural awareness, isn't a dippy love-child celebration of orgone – it's a simple yet radical affirmation that we each grow our own passions on a different medium, that instead of having two or three or even half a dozen sexual orientations, we should be thinking in terms of millions. "Sex-positive" respects each of our unique sexual profiles, even as we acknowledge that some of us have been damaged by a culture that tries to eradicate sexual differences and possibilities.[9]

It's the cultural philosophy that understands sexuality as a potentially positive force in one's life, and it can, of course, be contrasted with sex-negativity, which sees sex as problematic, disruptive, and dangerous. Sex-positivity allows for and in fact celebrates sexual diversity, differing desires and relationships structures, and individual choices based on consent.[10]

History

[edit]
Main articles: 1960s counterculture, Free love, and Sexual revolution

In general use, the term sexual liberation is used to describe a socio-political movement, witnessed from the 1960s into the 1970s.[11] However, the term has been used at least since the late 1920s and is often attributed as being influenced by Freud's writing on sexual liberation and psychosexual issues, as well as Wilhelm Reich, who originally coined the term.[6]

During the 1960s, a shift in the ways people thought about sexuality began to take place, heralding a period of de-conditioning in some circles away from old world antecedents, and developing new codes of sexual behavior, many of which have since been integrated into the mainstream.[12]

The 1960s also heralded a new culture of "free love" with millions of young people embracing the hippie ethos and preaching the power of love and the beauty of sex as a natural part of ordinary life. Hippies believed that sex and sexuality were natural biological phenomena that should be neither denied nor repressed. Changes in attitudes reflected a perception that traditional views on sexuality were both hypocritical and male-chauvinistic.

Sexual liberalization heralded a new ethos in experimenting with open sex in and outside of marriage, contraception and the pill, public nudity, gay liberation, legalized abortion, interracial marriage, a return to natural childbirth, women's rights, and feminism.

Historian David Allyn argues that the sexual revolution was a time of "coming-out": about premarital sex, masturbation, erotic fantasies, pornography use, and sexuality.[11]

The term sex-positive first came into use in the United States in the late 1990s with the founding of the Center for Sex and Culture in San Francisco, California, and The Center for Sex Positive Culture in Seattle, Washington. In 2009, Sex Positive World began in Portland, Oregon. As of 2019, there are more than sixteen chapters of the nonprofit, in five countries.[citation needed]

Sex-positive feminism

[edit]
Main article: Sex-positive feminism

Sex-positive feminism, also known as pro-sex feminism, sex-radical feminism, or sexually liberal feminism, is a movement that began in the early 1980s. In the 1970s, the second-wave feminist movement emerged, characterized by its opposition to pornography, sex work, and BDSM, known and referred to as sex-negative or antiporn viewpoints.[13]

Some became involved in the sex-positive feminist movement in response to efforts by anti-pornography feminists, such as Catharine MacKinnon and Dorchen Leidholdt, to put pornography at the center of a feminist explanation of women's oppression.[14] Andrea Dworkin and Robin Morgan held the belief as anti-pornography feminists that the degradation and objectification of women's bodies fostered ideas of sexual violence and assault.[13] This period of intense debate and acrimony between sex-positive and anti-pornography feminists during the early 1980s is often referred to as the "Feminist Sex Wars". Other sex-positive feminists became involved, not in opposition to other feminists, but in direct response to what they saw as patriarchal control of sexuality. Some authors who have advocated sex-positive feminism include Erika Lust, Ellen Willis, Susie Bright, Patrick Califia, Gayle Rubin, Carol Queen, Avedon Carol, Tristan Taormino, Diana Cage, Nina Hartley, Amia Srinivasan, Mireille Miller-Young, and Betty Dodson.

Sex-positive feminism gives attention and acknowledges the importance of women's right to explore their bodies, sexual desire, and considers that sexual violence does not have to prevent the vindication of female desire.[15] This movement demands the preservation of freedom and is against norms that are present in the sexual sphere. It also encourages and demands respect for variety and sexual dissidence without allowing itself to be harmed by intense anti-sex pressure from critics.[15]

Sex-positive feminism affirms that the discourse on women's sexual pleasure is silenced and marginalized in today's world.[16] Suppressing sexual dialogue with the supposed purpose of protecting women will only make them appear, according to this perspective, as the weaker sex. Women could have difficulty defending themselves with the classification as victims.[17] Over time, women have been classified as sexually passive, while men are recognized as sexually aggressive, so intercourse is considered an activity in which women "submit" to men's desire.[18] Another factor that continues to minimize female desire is the lack of consensus and research on it, a product of the social repression that women have had to endure over the centuries, which has led to prejudices and generalizations.[15]

Shere Hite, a sex educator and feminist, challenged misconceptions about female sexuality, and supported feminine sexual liberation and the right for individuals to freely express and explore their sexuality without judgement or repression. As demonstrated in her work, "The Hite Report: A Nationwide Study of Female Sexuality" (1976), she countered Freudian beliefs asserting that women were capable to experiencing sexual pleasure independently, without the need for intercourse.[19][20][21] However, Hite faced antifeminist backlash due to her statistical methods of collecting data, demonstrating bias, and therefore the book became largely controversial and threatening to certain parties of men.[22]

The sexual hierarchy system places heterosexuality, marriage and procreation at the top, which causes many women to fear the sexual system that predominates in today's world.[23] Pleasure and sexuality are human rights that have been subjugated by an old-fashioned patriarchal social construction.[24] Pro-sex feminism endeavors to cultivate sexuality as a site of political resistance. By using the "pleasure" factor in their favor, a significant contribution to the contemporary queer theory and politics has been made by using sexual and feminist "empowerment."[25]

Empowering perspectives

[edit]

Sex-positive education for youth

[edit]

The sex-positive movement is also concerned with the teaching of comprehensive and accurate sex education in schools.[4] Programs such as the "Abstinence Education Grant Program (AEGP)" teach abstinence as the healthy way to approach one's sexual desires and to avoid sexually transmitted infections such as HIV/AIDS.[26] However, in May 2021, The Real Education and Access for Healthy Youth Act (REAHYA) introduced federal grants aimed to encompass truthful, and inclusive sex education for the youth. It seeks to put an end to federal funding for the Title V state grant program, which promotes the abstinence-until-marriage ideology, which could be detrimental for early education.[27] The A-H guidelines from Title V of the Social Security Act convey a distinct perspective that places the notion that engaging in sexual activity exclusively within the context of marriage is the only acceptable behavior (excluding LGBT individuals), supporting the abstinence-only-until-marriage programs.[28] The movement seeks to promote a healthier view for youth to understand the open, honest, non-judgemental, accepting approach to learning and teaching about sex positivity.[29]

Sex work industry

[edit]

The sex work industry encompasses pornography, prostitution (escort services, massage parlors, and brothels), cybersex services, exotic dancing, and online nude modeling. About 40 to 42 million women globally are involved in the sex work industry; however, estimates of the number of LGBT sex workers are often not accounted for. Feminist, queer, and human right scholars use the term sex work to emphasize the economic choices made when entering the sex labor industry, regardless of legal status and gender identity. The complexity of the sex work industry excludes the workers from protection provided by international, federal, and state regulations, making the rights of sex workers fundamental human rights.

Sex workers require protection against pimps and criminal syndicates who easily take advantage of their earnings, and also require protection from violence, discrimination, social marginalization, and easier access to healthcare and housing services. Sex workers are frequently subjected to criminalization, while usually the men involved, as either consumers or controllers of labor, often walk away unpunished. There is differing conversations between feminists, queer scholars, activists, and practitioner's opinions of whether sex work should be decriminalized, legalized, and/or unionized. They all agree that the power dynamics inherent in the social constructs of gender, race, class, age, sexuality, and nationality generate economical conditions that force sex workers to operate and make a living within violently patriarchal and capitalist frameworks.[30]

[edit]

Sex-positive movement emphasizes and supports the importance of consent in sexual encounters. Consent is the first and most basic form of respect between people when engaging in sexual activities. The negotiation and form of communication when discussing consent is the most important aspect when promoting healthy sexual relationships. Consent culture promotes affirmative consent, encourages enthusiastic consent, and the importance of consent education to foster healthy and respectful sexual relations. Consent gives a way to articulate and legitimize our moral judgments in public.[31]

Affirmative consent describes the explicit, informed, and voluntary assent to engage in sexual behavior. Anyone engaging in sexual interactions is responsible for making sure that the other party or parties have given their direct consent without hesitation. Absence of protest, words, or action does not mean consent, and silence will never be a form of consent. There should be no expectation of protest or opposition.[32]

A positive expression of consent is the main focus of enthusiastic consent. Invoking enthusiastic consent entails focusing on the presence of a "yes" as opposed to the absence of a "no." It can be communicated vocally or nonverbally using encouraging body language. These include nodding, maintaining eye contact, and smiling, as examples of body language. It is significant to remember that while these may imply consent, they do not represent explicit affirmative consent, always get verbal confirmation. The key to maintaining a healthy sexual relationship and consent is to regularly check in with one's partner or partners to make sure they are comfortable and that their opinions have not changed.[33]

Intersectionality

[edit]

Intersectionality within the sex-positive movement strives to recognize complex identities, inclusiveness, regardless of social categories of gender, class, race, and sexuality. It lacks the inclusion of race and ethnicity, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, and status. The sex-positive movement strives to move towards incorporating cultural diversity, and taking into account the variety in sexual practices as well as sexual minorities and other marginalized or oppressed identities. Positive sexuality compasses the well-being and happiness of an individual, individuality in sexuality, embracing multiple ways of knowing and learning, professional ethics, open and honest communication, peacemaking, while being applicable to all levels of social structure.

Sex-positivity was established and rooted from a Western perspective. Much of the current sex-positive frameworks is concentrated on the educated, industrialized, prosperous, and democratic populations, neglecting the idea of intersectionality and marginalized groups.[34][35]

Criticism

[edit]

In opposition, some feminists[who?] believe sex-positivity perceives disadvantage in women but makes them easier to oppress.[36][failed verification] A large religious—particularly Abrahamic—conservative opposition to sex-positivity sees human sexuality[6] as a destructive force except under the contract of a marriage. Sexual acts are ranked hierarchically, with marital heterosexuality at the top of the hierarchy and masturbation, homosexuality, and other sexualities that deviate from societal expectations closer to the bottom.[37] Medicine and psychiatry are said to have also contributed to sex-negativity, as they may designate some forms of sexuality that appear on the bottom of this hierarchy as being pathological (see mental illness).[37]

Multiple feminists, such as Verkerk, Glick, and Bauer have criticized iterations of sex-positivity due to concerns about its effectiveness in challenging patriarchal norms.[38][39][40] These feminists insist they are "sex-critical" rather than "sex-negative".[41] Scholar, Verkerk, acknowledges this by stating that "there are both harmful and liberating aspects of female sexual objectification and an accurate account of it must consider both".[42] Critics also take issue with the commodification of sexuality. Women are told both to invest in western standards of beauty and sexualization while also becoming "consumable objects themselves."[38] Sex-positive feminism has also been criticized for its emphasis on defeating the patriarchal gender norms through personal life choices, "rather than to dismantle, critique, expose, or challenge systematic discrimination and violence."[43]

SlutWalk DC 2012

The SlutWalk has received criticism of its efficacy as an activist event. SlutWalk's purpose was to reclaim the word "slut" and counteract victim-blaming.[44] Despite the aim of the slut-walk, critics point out that the word "slut" had not been reclaimed.[45] Rather, the word slut had become reified.[45] Critics of the SlutWalk also suggest that the focus on revealing clothing "ultimately displace[s] the sombre and deadly issues of rape, domestic violence, sexual abuse, and street harassment."[45] Lastly, the SlutWalk received criticism for lack of consideration of the hyper-sexualization that women of colour face.[46] Black Women's Blueprint penned an open letter to the slut-walk explaining that Black women cannot "afford to label" themselves as those in the slut-walk do.

In the 21st century

[edit]

Since the early 2000s, the sex-positivity movement has continued to move closer into the mainstream.[2] The advent of social media has made the sex-positivity movement more accessible by giving advocates of the movement platforms to promote their beliefs to a wide audience of followers. By extending the reach of the movement, sex-positivity has come to be inclusive of all sorts of sex and sexuality.[5] Shaming has become an area of particular interest within the sex-positivity movement, encouraging people to be more open and accepting of the different experiences people have with sex and sexuality.[47] Slut-shaming, prude-shaming and kink-shaming have all been challenged by the sex-positivity movement in an effort to allow all people to feel supported by and included in the movement.[48]

Online sex-positive communities

[edit]

Platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, have curated large communities of sex-positive groups, inviting and creating easily accessible places for people to join. Additionally, there has been an exponential increase in sex-positive fetish digital apps promoting BDSM kink such as Ferly, Feeld, Bloom now Plura, and #open. Events held annually like the Shinto Kanamara Matsuri, Folsom Street Fair, Sexpo, Really Good Sex Festival, invite and promote the sex-positive community to the public, attracting tourists and media coverage from around the world.[49][better source needed][50]

Cybersex has become popular with the advancement of technology due to the increased accessibility to the internet. The visibility of male sexual services on the internet and websites catering male escorts has also increased due to the preference for the privacy and anonymity that cybersex offers as an online service. This has benefited the male sex industry, especially for gay social spaces that often feel discomforting in traditional settings.[51]

Mainstream media

[edit]

Pop culture has also played a large role in bringing the sex-positivity movement into the mainstream. Celebrities, including Lady Gaga, Amber Rose, Jessica Biel, Cameron Diaz, Taylor Swift and many others, have spoken publicly about their experiences with slut-shaming, sexuality, sexual assault, body acceptance and overall sexual health and responsibility.[52][53]

In recent years, sex-positive concepts have found their way into dance clubs through sex-positive parties in cities like Berlin and Vienna.[54] Sex-positive podcasts like You Came First With Meghan Barton Hanson, Sex with Emily, Sexology, along with social media content on platforms like TikTok and YouTube, have been increasingly popular, attracting and specifically targeting a younger audience who engage in open discussions and fosters conversations about being sex-positive and personal sexual experiences.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c "A Sex Positive Renaissance". Allena Gabosch. 8 December 2014. Retrieved 26 March 2018.
  2. ^ a b "Sex Positivity". Women and Gender Advocacy Center. Colorado State University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2020. Retrieved 13 June 2020.
  3. ^ "Why The Sex Positivity Movement Has A Long Way To Go". lappthebrand. 16 August 2018. Retrieved 12 May 2023.
  4. ^ a b Abraham, Laurie (16 November 2011). "Teaching Good Sex". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 26 March 2018.
  5. ^ a b Ivanski, Chantelle; Kohut, Taylor (2017). "Exploring definitions of sex positivity through thematic analysis". The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality. 26 (3): 216–225. doi:10.3138/cjhs.2017-0017. S2CID 148995818.
  6. ^ a b c d Johansson, Warren. 1990. "Sex Negative, Sex Positive". In: Dynes WR (ed). Encyclopedia of Homosexuality. New York: Garland. p 1182–1183. ISBN 0-8153-1880-4.
  7. ^ See, for example, Wilhelm Reich, The Invasion of Compulsory Sex-Morality (Der Einbruch der Sexualmoral, 1932); The Sexual Revolution (Die Sexualität im Kulturkampf, 1936).
  8. ^ a b c d Ivanski, Chantelle; Kohut, Taylor (16 November 2017). "Exploring definitions of sex positivity through thematic analysis". The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality. 26 (3): 216–225. doi:10.3138/cjhs.2017-0017. ISSN 2017-0017. S2CID 148995818.
  9. ^ Queen, Carol (1997). Real Live Nude Girl: Chronicles of Sex-Positive Culture. Pittsburgh (Cleis Press). ISBN 1-57344-073-6
  10. ^ Queen, Carol; Comella, Lynn (2008). "The Necessary Revolution: Sex-Positive Feminism in the Post-Barnard Era". The Communication Review. 11 (3): 274–291. doi:10.1080/10714420802306783.
  11. ^ a b Allyn, David (2000). Make love, not war: the sexual revolution, an unfettered history. Warner Trade Publishing. ISBN 978-0-316-03930-7.
  12. ^ Time. 1967.
  13. ^ a b MasterClass (11 October 2022). "Sex-Positive Feminism: 5 Notable Sex-Positive Feminists". MasterClass. Retrieved 15 May 2023.
  14. ^ McElroy, W (2002). Liberty for Women: Freedom and Feminism in the Twenty-First Century. Chicago.
  15. ^ a b c Rodriquez, M.J.M. (2005). "EL FEMINISMO "PRO-SEXO" O ANTI-CENSURA: UNA LECTURA SEXOLÓGICA". Anuario de sexología: 18.
  16. ^ McGeeney, Ester; Kehily, Mary Jane (3 May 2016). "Young people and sexual pleasure – where are we now?". Sex Education. 16 (3): 235. doi:10.1080/14681811.2016.1147149. ISSN 1468-1811. S2CID 147522408.
  17. ^ Tentaciones (23 August 2017). "Por qué es tan importante que las mujeres hablen abiertamente de sexo". El País (in Spanish). ISSN 1134-6582. Retrieved 26 February 2021.
  18. ^ Seabrook, Rita C.; Ward, L. Monique; Cortina, Lilia M.; Giaccardi, Soraya; Lippman, Julia R. (12 April 2017). "Girl Power or Powerless Girl? Television, Sexual Scripts, and Sexual Agency in Sexually Active Young Women". Psychology of Women Quarterly. 41 (2): 240. doi:10.1177/0361684316677028. ISSN 0361-6843. S2CID 152048528.
  19. ^ Seelye, Katharine Q. (11 September 2020). "Shere Hite, Who Challenged Myths of Female Sexuality, Dies at 77". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 13 May 2023.
  20. ^ "The Official Website of Shere Hite". www.hiteresearchfoundation.org. Retrieved 13 May 2023.
  21. ^ "The Hite Report: A Nationwide Study of Female Sexuality"
  22. ^ Faludi, Susan (18 November 2009). Backlash: The Undeclared War Against American Women. Crown. ISBN 978-0-307-42687-1.
  23. ^ Maclaran, Pauline (14 December 2017), "Judith Butler: Gender Performativity and Heterosexual Hegemony", Canonical Authors in Consumption Theory, Routledge, p. 230, doi:10.4324/9781315626093-29, ISBN 978-1-315-62609-3, retrieved 26 February 2021
  24. ^ Kismödi, Eszter; Corona, Esther; Maticka-Tyndale, Eleanor; Rubio-Aurioles, Eusebio; Coleman, Eli (12 July 2017). "Sexual Rights as Human Rights: A Guide for the WAS Declaration of Sexual Rights". International Journal of Sexual Health. 29 (sup1): 22–23. doi:10.1080/19317611.2017.1353865. ISSN 1931-7611. S2CID 148862236.
  25. ^ Neill, Emily Rider (20 May 2019). "Troubling the Body: A Feminist Critique of Corporeal Politics": 27–28. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  26. ^ Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention Program. State Abstinence Education Grant Program; Fact Sheet. Family & Youth Services Bureau, 2018-07.https://esteemjourney.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/State-Abstinenece-Education-Grants.pdf
  27. ^ Diamondstein, Megan (26 May 2021). "Federal Bill Would Promote Youth Sex Education in U.S." Center for Reproductive Rights. Retrieved 12 May 2023.
  28. ^ Malone, Patrick; Rodriguez, Monica (2011). "Comprehensive Sex Education vs. Abstinence-Only-Until-Marriage Programs". Human Rights. 38 (2): 5–22. ISSN 0046-8185. JSTOR 23032415.
  29. ^ "What is sex positivity?". School of Sexuality Education. 4 November 2019. Retrieved 12 May 2023.
  30. ^ "Introduction to Women's, Gender and Sexuality Studies - L. Ayu Saraswati; Barbara L. Shaw; Heather Rellihan - Oxford University Press; Sex Work as Labor". global.oup.com. p. 197. Retrieved 16 May 2023.
  31. ^ Burnes, Theodore R.; Singh, Anneliese A.; Witherspoon, Ryan G. (7 July 2017). "Sex Positivity and Counseling Psychology" (PDF). American Psychological Association. doi:10.1177/0011000017710216. S2CID 149248066. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 May 2023. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  32. ^ Dougherty, Tom (2015). "Yes Means Yes: Consent as Communication". Philosophy & Public Affairs. 43 (3): 224–253. doi:10.1111/papa.12059. ISSN 0048-3915. JSTOR 26605233.
  33. ^ "What Consent Looks Like | RAINN". www.rainn.org. Retrieved 18 May 2023.
  34. ^ Alexander, Apryl A. (2019). "Sex for All: Sex Positivity and Intersectionality in Clinical and Counseling Psychology". Journal of Black Sexuality and Relationships. 6 (1): 49–72. doi:10.1353/bsr.2019.0015. ISSN 2376-7510. S2CID 208688540.
  35. ^ Williams, D.J; Thomas, Jeremy N.; Prior, Emily E.; Walters, Wendy (2015). "Introducing a multidisciplinary framework of positive sexuality" (PDF). Journal of Positive Sexuality. 1: 6–11. doi:10.51681/1.112.
  36. ^ Lampen, Claire (23 February 2020). "The Disturbing Rise of the '50 Shades' Defense for Murder". The Cut.
  37. ^ a b Rubin, Gayle (1984). Thinking Sex: Notes for a Radical Theory of the Politics of Sexuality. In Carole S. Vance (Ed.), Pleasure and Danger: exploring female sexuality, pp. 267–319. Boston (Routledge & Kegan Paul). ISBN 0-7100-9974-6
  38. ^ a b Verkerk, Willow (2017), Gandesha, Samir; Hartle, Johan F. (eds.), "Reification, Sexual Objectification, and Feminist Activism", The Spell of Capital, Reification and Spectacle, Amsterdam University Press, pp. 149–162, ISBN 978-90-8964-851-8, JSTOR j.ctt1pk3jqt.11, retrieved 26 February 2021
  39. ^ Bauer, Nancy (2015). How to do things with pornography. Cambridge, Massachusetts. ISBN 978-0-674-05520-9. OCLC 893709461.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  40. ^ Glick, Elisa (2000). "Sex Positive: Feminism, Queer Theory, and the Politics of Transgression". Feminist Review. 64 (64): 19–45. doi:10.1080/014177800338936. ISSN 0141-7789. JSTOR 1395699. S2CID 145181041.
  41. ^ Sun, The Cornell Daily (3 September 2013). "JOHN: Rethinking Sex-Positivity". The Cornell Daily Sun. Retrieved 26 February 2021.
  42. ^ Verkerk, Willow (2017), Gandesha, Samir; Hartle, Johan F. (eds.), "Reification, Sexual Objectification, and Feminist Activism", The Spell of Capital, Reification and Spectacle, Amsterdam University Press, p. 157, ISBN 978-90-8964-851-8, JSTOR j.ctt1pk3jqt.11, retrieved 26 February 2021
  43. ^ Nguyen, Tram (2013). "From SlutWalks to SuicideGirls: Feminist Resistance in the Third Wave and Postfeminist Era". WSQ: Women's Studies Quarterly. 41 (3–4): 158. doi:10.1353/wsq.2013.0102. ISSN 1934-1520. S2CID 85288792.
  44. ^ Nguyen, Tram (2013). "From SlutWalks to SuicideGirls: Feminist Resistance in the Third Wave and Postfeminist Era". WSQ: Women's Studies Quarterly. 41 (3–4): 159. doi:10.1353/wsq.2013.0102. ISSN 1934-1520. S2CID 85288792.
  45. ^ a b c Nguyen, Tram (2013). "From SlutWalks to SuicideGirls: Feminist Resistance in the Third Wave and Postfeminist Era". WSQ: Women's Studies Quarterly. 41 (3–4): 160. doi:10.1353/wsq.2013.0102. ISSN 1934-1520. S2CID 85288792.
  46. ^ Nguyen, Tram (2013). "From SlutWalks to SuicideGirls: Feminist Resistance in the Third Wave and Postfeminist Era". WSQ: Women's Studies Quarterly. 41 (3–4): 161. doi:10.1353/wsq.2013.0102. ISSN 1934-1520. S2CID 85288792.
  47. ^ Fahs, Breanne (2014). "'Freedom to' and 'freedom from': A new vision for sex-positive politics". Sexualities. 17 (3): 267–290. doi:10.1177/1363460713516334. S2CID 144575799.
  48. ^ Tolman, Deborah L.; Anderson, Stephanie M.; Belmonte, Kimberly (2015). "Mobilizing Metaphor: Considering Complexities, Contradictions, and Contexts in Adolescent Girls' and Young Women's Sexual Agency". Sex Roles. 73 (7–8): 298–310. doi:10.1007/s11199-015-0510-0. S2CID 141668694.
  49. ^ Jurberg, Ash (14 May 2021). "8 Sex Festivals That Should Be On Your Bucket List". Sexography. Retrieved 14 May 2023.
  50. ^ Garrett, Ally (28 January 2016). "Festival of Really Good Sex: getting rubbed the right way – and the wrong way". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 14 May 2023.
  51. ^ Minichiello, Victor; Scott, John; Callander, Denton (2013). "New Pleasures and Old Dangers: Reinventing Male Sex Work". The Journal of Sex Research. 50 (3/4): 263–275. doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.760189. ISSN 0022-4499. JSTOR 42002059. PMID 23480072. S2CID 9066499.
  52. ^ "9 Celebs Getting Candid About Sexual Health". Shape Magazine. 25 September 2015. Retrieved 4 April 2018.
  53. ^ "These 9 Sex-Positive Women Celebrities Should Be Your Role Models". YourTango. 24 March 2017. Retrieved 4 April 2018.
  54. ^ Christoph Benkeser (22 November 2018). "Sex-Positive in Wien: Alles, was ihr über die neue Party wissen müsst". Vice. Retrieved 21 March 2021.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sex-positive_movement&oldid=1247892931#Opposition"