Patent Law Treaty

The Patent Law Treaty (PLT) is a treaty adopted by the World Intellectual Property Organization signed on 1 June 2000 in Geneva, Switzerland, by 53 States and the European Patent Organisation (an intergovernmental organization). It entered into force on April 28, 2005. It aims at harmonizing and streamlining formal procedures such as the requirements to obtain a filing date for a patent application, the form and content of a patent application, and representation. The treaty "does not establish a uniform procedure for all parties to the PLT but leaves parties free to require fewer or more user-friendly requirements than those provided in the PLT."^[1] As of February 2023, the PLT had 43 contracting states.^[2]

History

**Contracting States to the Patent Law Treaty and dates of entry into force**^[2]
Date	State
28 April 2005	Republic of Moldova, Kyrgyz Republic, Republic of Slovenia, Slovak Republic, Federal Republic of Nigeria, Ukraine, Republic of Estonia, Kingdom of Denmark, Republic of Croatia, Romania
15 December 2005	Bahrain
6 March 2006	Finland
22 March 2006	United Kingdom (including the Isle of Man)
19 July 2006	Uzbekistan
16 October 2007	Oman
27 December 2007	Sweden
12 March 2008	Hungary
1 July 2008	Switzerland
16 March 2009	Australia
12 August 2009	Russia
18 December 2009	Liechtenstein
5 January 2010	France
22 April 2010	North Macedonia
17 May 2010	Albania
12 June 2010	Latvia
20 August 2010	Serbia
27 December 2010	Netherlands (the whole Kingdom, except Aruba)
19 October 2011	Kazakhstan
3 February 2012	Lithuania
9 March 2012	Montenegro
9 May 2012	Bosnia and Herzegovina
27 May 2012	Ireland
3 August 2013	Saudi Arabia
17 September 2013	Armenia
18 December 2013	United States
11 June 2016	Japan
21 October 2016	Belarus
4 January 2017	Liberia
22 August 2018	North Korea
25 June 2019	Antigua and Barbuda
30 October 2019	Canada
19 July 2021	Turkmenistan

France

Prior to the entry into force of the treaty in France, a bill was submitted on 14 January 2009 at the French Senate proposing the ratification of the PLT by France.^[3]^[4] In March 2009, a report from French Senator Rachel Mazuir recommended the ratification of the PLT, as soon as possible, by France.^[5]^[6] On 24 July 2009, the government was authorized to ratify the PLT.^[7] The PLT then entered into force for France on 5 January 2010.^[2]

United States

The Treaty was transmitted from the President to the Senate in 2006. The Senate Foreign Relations Committee issued its Executive Report 110-6 in November 2007. Non-self-executing portions of the PLT were implemented as statute by the Patent Law Treaties Implementation Act of 2012, Pub. Law 112-211 (Dec. 12, 2012). The PLT was ratified by the United States on 18 September 2013, and the ratification instrument was forwarded to WIPO. The Patent Office's implementing regulations were proposed at 78 Fed. Reg. 21788 (Apr. 11, 2013) and issued as a Final Rule at 78 Fed. Reg. 62367 (Oct. 21, 2013).

Mexico

Article 20(7)(3) of the proposed new NAFTA, in December 2019, stated that "Each Party shall give due consideration to ratifying or acceding to the PLT, or, in the alternative, shall adopt or maintain procedural standards consistent with the objective of the PLT".^[8]

References

^ Mulder, Cees; van Woudenberg, Roel (2022). "New Rule 56a and amendments to Rule 56 EPC - Background, requirements and consequences". Epi Information.
^ ^a ^b ^c "Contracting Parties > Patent Law Treaty (Total Contracting Parties: 43)". WIPO. Retrieved 29 March 2023.
^ (in French) French Senate web site, Sénat, Session Ordinaire de 2008–2009, Annexe au procès-verbal de la séance du 14 janvier 2009, Projet de Loi autorisant la ratification du traité sur le droit des brevets, 14 January 2009. Consulted on 22 January 2009
^ (in French) Laurent Teyssedre, Ratification du PLT, Le blog du droit européen des brevets, 20 January 2009. Consulted on 22 January 2009
^ (in French) French Senate web site, Annexe au procès-verbal de la séance du 17 mars 2009, Rapport fait au nom de la commission des Affaires étrangères, de la défense et des forces armées sur le projet de loi autorisant la ratification du traité sur le droit des brevets, Par M. Rachel Mazuir, Sénateur
^ (in French) Laurent Teyssedre, Ratification du PLT (suite), Le blog du droit européen des brevets, 25 March 2009. Consulted on 29 March 2009
^ (in French) JORF n°0170 du 25 juillet 2009 page 12409, texte n° 3, LOI n° 2009-892 du 24 juillet 2009 autorisant la ratification du traité sur le droit des brevets, NOR: MAEJ0815903L
^ CHAPTER 20: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS: Section A: General Provisions (PDF).

External links

Patent Law Treaty in the WIPO Lex database – official website of WIPO.
- The full text of the Patent Law Treaty (in English)

[1] Mulder, Cees; van Woudenberg, Roel (2022). "New Rule 56a and amendments to Rule 56 EPC - Background, requirements and consequences". Epi Information.

[WIPO-list-2] "Contracting Parties > Patent Law Treaty (Total Contracting Parties: 43)". WIPO. Retrieved 29 March 2023.

[3] (in French) French Senate web site, Sénat, Session Ordinaire de 2008–2009, Annexe au procès-verbal de la séance du 14 janvier 2009, Projet de Loi autorisant la ratification du traité sur le droit des brevets, 14 January 2009. Consulted on 22 January 2009

[4] (in French) Laurent Teyssedre, Ratification du PLT, Le blog du droit européen des brevets, 20 January 2009. Consulted on 22 January 2009

[5] (in French) French Senate web site, Annexe au procès-verbal de la séance du 17 mars 2009, Rapport fait au nom de la commission des Affaires étrangères, de la défense et des forces armées sur le projet de loi autorisant la ratification du traité sur le droit des brevets, Par M. Rachel Mazuir, Sénateur

[6] (in French) Laurent Teyssedre, Ratification du PLT (suite), Le blog du droit européen des brevets, 25 March 2009. Consulted on 29 March 2009

[7] (in French) JORF n°0170 du 25 juillet 2009 page 12409, texte n° 3, LOI n° 2009-892 du 24 juillet 2009 autorisant la ratification du traité sur le droit des brevets, NOR: MAEJ0815903L

[8] CHAPTER 20: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS: Section A: General Provisions (PDF).

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

v t e WIPO-Administered Treaties
Intellectual Property protection treaties	Beijing Treaty on Audiovisual Performances Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works Brussels Convention Relating to the Distribution of Programme-Carrying Signals Transmitted by Satellite Madrid Agreement for the Repression of False or Deceptive Indications of Source on Goods Marrakesh VIP Treaty Nairobi Treaty on the Protection of the Olympic Symbol Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property Patent Law Treaty Convention for the Protection of Producers of Phonograms Against Unauthorized Duplication of Their Phonograms Rome Convention for the Protection of Performers, Producers of Phonograms and Broadcasting Organisations Singapore Treaty on the Law of Trademarks Trademark Law Treaty of 1994 Washington Treaty on Intellectual Property in Respect of Integrated Circuits WIPO Copyright Treaty WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty
Global protection system treaties	Budapest Treaty on the International Recognition of the Deposit of Microorganisms for the Purposes of Patent Procedure Hague Agreement Concerning the International Deposit of Industrial Designs Lisbon Agreement for the Protection of Appellations of Origin and their International Registration Madrid Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Marks Protocol Relating to the Madrid Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Marks Patent Cooperation Treaty
Treaties against biopiracy and misappropriation	WIPO Treaty on Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources and Associated Traditional Knowledge
Classification treaties	Locarno Agreement Establishing an International Classification for Industrial Designs Nice Agreement Concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purposes of the Registration of Marks Strasbourg Agreement Concerning the International Patent Classification Vienna Agreement Establishing an International Classification of the Figurative Elements of Marks