Jump to content

Murburn concept

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Murburn hypothesis)

In the field of enzymology, murburn is a term coined by Kelath Murali Manoj that explains the catalytic mechanism of certain redox-active proteins.[1][2][3] The term describes the equilibrium among molecules, unbound ions and radicals, signifying a process of "mild unrestricted redox catalysis".

Murburn is abstracted from "mured burning" (connoting a "closed burning", an oxidative process), and implies equilibriums involving diffusible reactive oxygen species (DRS/DROS/ROS). Though akin to the oxygen assisted combustion of fuel, unlike the flames produced in the open burning process, the biological reaction occurs in enclosed premises, is mild and may generate heat alone (and no flames). Such a reaction could also incur selective and specific electron/moiety transfers.

Further, though burning is a reaction that usually involves oxygen (aerobic process), "burning flames"[4] produced by anoxic oxidants are also well-known.[4] Therefore, the enzymes working via murburn scheme (aerobic or anaerobic) could be called murzymes and the region around the biomolecule where the DRS interacts with the final ‘substrate’ is called ‘murzone’.[5]

The basic components

[edit]
  • Molecule – Usually a molecule with an extended pi-electronic system or metallic centers with d electrons or a combination of both. A redox protein/enzyme qualifies for this role because it has one or more cofactors with the required attribute. (e.g. hemeproteins, flavoproteins,Cu/Zn proteins, etc.). Occasionally, some proteins that lack the above cofactors but have high amounts of charged residues and suitably located substrate binding sites could also aid DROS dynamics and catalysis (e.g. lactate dehydrogenase, transducin, Complex V, etc.)
  • Unbound ion – naturally occurring ions of several types, carrying or relaying charges
  • Radical – transiently generated species in milieu, from any additive or in situ components

Salient features

[edit]

While enzyme activities are classically defined by the interaction of the protein with its substrate at a defined active site (necessitating a topological recognition of the interactive participants), murburn scheme obligatorily invokes a DRS (or a reactive radical) for carrying out this agenda.[6] The conventional enzyme-substrate interaction scheme invokes Fischer’s lock and key type affinity or Koshland’s induced fit theory. That is, a substrate is identified by the enzyme by virtue of a topographical complementation, and thereafter, the enzyme-substrate complex undergoes a "transition-state," leading to products.[7]

Such a system shows certainty/determinism, usually abides by the standard models of kinetics (like Michaelis-Menten scheme) and the inhibitors may be of competitive, non-competitive, uncompetitive, etc. The classical enzymes have a unique substrate or a well defined set of substrates.

In contrast, murburn scheme (as shown in figure) might invoke an enzyme-substrate complementation, but this aspect is not obligatory. The kinetics of the reaction may at times not be traceable with standard models because the diffusible reactive species is subjected to multiple equilibriums and the product of interest may be favorably formed only in discrete concentrations of the protagonists.

Therefore, the outcomes in such systems could be subjected to a lot of uncertainty and the overall reaction scheme might exhibit varying and non-integral stoichiometry. The modulators/influencers (activators or inhibitors) may work by mixed modalities, owing to affects on the protein, substrate or the diffusible species. The murzymes may have a wide variety of substrates, as the reaction scheme is dependent on multiple modalities of interactions and outcomes. These considerations seek us to overcome the aesthetic perspective that DROS are mere manifestations of pathophysiology.[8][9] A relevant comparison is that the presence of knife-racks, cutting boards and gloves in kitchen (analogous to enzymes like superoxide dismutase and catalase, membrane-embedded proteins with one-electron active redox centers, etc.) does not mean that knife is a dangerous component that must be avoided. On the contrary, it is an important tool across the globe that has to be used with adequate care. Quite similarly, the cellular machinery has evolved to harness the reaction potential of DRS. The aesthetic perspective/concern that DRS would wreak havoc in routine physiology is no more relevant because several decades of research has now clearly established that DRS are routinely observed and unavoidable in physiology, and they cannot be just wished away.[10] It has also been demonstrated that sustained release of DRS could afford selectivity (choice of a particular reactant from a variety, say B from A, B, C and D) and specificity (attack at a specific locus, like alpha- or para- positions of a reactant). Therefore, such a selectivity can be compared to how setting fire to a damp cloth dipped in oil burns the oil first and minimally chars the cloth's fabric. Analogously, murburn activity has cumulative collateral damage, which leads to aging, and ultimately, death. Murburn concept stresses the already well-established fundamental awareness that all molecules/processes in life have spatial, temporal, quantitative and contextual relevance. A comparison of the classical perspectives and murburn concept is given in the figure and the perceptional changes ushered in by murburn concept can be captured in the Table 1.[11]

Comparison of classical enzyme mechanism and the contextual extension afforded with murburn concept, which considers diffusible reactive species (DRS) as a vital participant in routine metabolism/physiology.[11] AP, I, P, R and S stand for alternate product, influencing additive, product, redox center and substrate, respectively.

The new mechanism has been proposed as an explanation for phenomena involving catalytic electron or moiety transfers, chemico-physical changes and unusual observations in various experimental, ecological, metabolic and physiological scenarios. Fundamentally, murburn concept advocates the thesis that DRS are vital requirements for routine metabolic and physiological functions. This theory is validated by its ability to explain the toxicity of cyanide to a variety of important life processes (particularly, respiration and photosynthesis).[12][13]

Table 1: Salient perception changes ushered in by murburn concept
Criteria/Role Classical perception Murburn concept
Oxygen Active site of redox proteins Murzone around diverse proteins
DR(O)S Toxic waste Essential intermediate
Additives Active/allosteric sites Multiple interactive equilibriums
Molecular interactions Affinity driven complexations Bimolecular collisions (± affinity)
Mechanistic route Unique Multiple
Protein structure Conformational changes needed Conformation change optional
Mandate/Control Deterministic Stochastic

Application

[edit]
Heme/flavin enzymology and electron transfer phenomena
Enzymes containing heme and flavin groups (as exemplified by peroxidases, catalases, reductases, etc.) are ubiquitous in cellular systems. While several moiety and electron transfer reactions they catalyze are mediated at the active site (heme/flavin center),[14][15][16] some reactions are mediated via diffusible species. Going beyond the Michaelis-Menten paradigm to explain the outcomes of the latter types of reactions (with various additives and inhibitors) is the core purview of murburn concept.[17][18]
Ecology
Fungal heme haloperoxidases (like chloroperoxidase) are the ultimate source for the generation of the vast majority of all natural halogenated organics in the environment and hemeperoxidases are also responsible for the breakdown of plant lignocellulosic materials.[19][20][21][22][23] Thus, the murburn activities of hemeperoxidases are very important for explaining the carbon/halogen cycles.[24]
Drug/Xenobiotic metabolism
The man-made drugs and xenobiotics present a molecular topology that the cellular system may not be aware of, and therefore, a definite affinity-based identification of the alien molecule may not be feasible. The classical P450cam based model fails to explain the promiscuity of reduction of dozens of liver microsomal cytochrome P450s by a unique reductase (which is distributed at much lower concentrations) and it is also inexplicable therein how diverse drug molecules are reacted by a single CYP or why some CYPs do not convert a given drug. Also, drug-drug interactions based on active site binding effects alone cannot explain the outcomes. With the obligatory involvement of DRS, the murburn scheme affords a tangible modality to account for the way the hepatocytes deal with such challenges and the new model could potentially explain diverse types of drug interactions and outcomes of mutations.[25][26][27]
Cellular respiration thermogenesis and dynamic homeostasis
In the initial phase of evolution, an affinity-based identification may not have been present. Also, mitochondria possess finger-countable protons whereas tens of thousands of purported proton-pumping protein complexes. Further, oxygen is a highly mobile molecule that cannot be expected to remain non-reactive in the presence of the multitude of redox centers present in the mitochondrial membrane respiratory complexes. With respect to these considerations, the classical electron transport chain (ETC) based chemiosmotic rotary ATP synthesis model becomes untenable. The murburn model presents a new interpretation of the physiology of cellular respiration: including oxidative phosphorylation, thermogenesis and dynamic redox homeostasis. Also, the effects of a wide bevy of respiratory toxins (as exemplified by cyanide) to diverse physiologies and life forms are explained by the murburn scheme, which invokes DRS.[28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]
Hemoglobin in erythrocyte physiology
RBCs function viably for about 4 months, although lacking a nucleus (for genetic regulations) or mitochondria (for carrying out the classical oxidative phosphorlation). A quantitative assessment shows that the glycolytic machinery present within is inadequate for the bioenergetic requirements of erythrocytes. Murburn concept based explorations revealed that the highly packed tetrameric hemoglobin could synthesize ATP using a DRS-based logic. The new perspective affords better structure-function correlations for the various monomers (A,B & F) of the protein and roles of nicotinamide nucleotides and bisphosphoglycerate.[32]
Hormesis and idiosyncratic dose responses
It has been a long-standing conundrum as to how certain molecules may produce a physiological effect at a low concentration whereas little impact is seen at higher concentrations. Classical ligand-receptor and enzyme-substrate binding interactive scheme can afford only mono-phasic (hyperbolic) or bell-shaped (when a molecule becomes toxic above a critical level) dose responses. Murburn concept affords a molecular explanation for such hormetic and certain types of idiosyncratic (person to person or case dependent “reactions”) physiological dispositions.[36][37]
Oxygenic photosynthesis
The tapping of sunlight's energy forms the primary means of provision of carbon-centered organic molecules for sustaining life on our planet. The classical explanations of Kok-Joliot cycle, Z-scheme, Q-cycle, etc. were demonstrated to be untenable. A murburn model (involving DROS) of sunlight harvesting (involving DROS) was recently proposed as a mechanism for the explanation of Emerson effect and several other observations (like the enhancement effect of bicarbonate ions on oxygen evolution, the enhancement of chloride ions on e-transfers in vitro, etc.) that were incompatible with the classical purview.[38][39][40][41][42][43]
Ionic differentials and electrophysiology
Classical membrane theory espouses that ionic differentials in and out of cells arise due to pumping by membrane-embedded proteins like Na-K-ATPase. Also in this purview, the source of trans-membrane potential (TMP) results due to difference of concentration of ions across phases. In the context or TMP fluctuations, murburn model brings in a new perspective of effective charge separation leading to an excess of negative charges transiently resulting inside, due to the ability of oxygen to accept free electron(s).Further, preferential co-solubilization of cations by respiratory activity has been pointed out as another reason for ion-differentials.[44][45]
Physiology of vision
The traditional visual cycle does not have any direct role for oxygen and entails the rods and cones serving as the primary photo-transduction agents. It involves retinal cis-trans conformation change and ejection from rhodopsin, conformation change of transducin and cycling via the retinal pigmented epithelium. In the new charted murburn cascade, photoexcitation of rhodopsin leads to the formation of superoxide, which attacks the GDP bound on alpha transducin, forming GTP, which detaches and gets converted to GDP by the beta module of transducin. The liberated GDP is an allosteric activator of phosphodiesterase-6, which enables the activation of c-GMP cascade. Therefore, in the murburn purview, oxygen is directly involved in visual physiology and rod/cone cells are the ultimate source of electrons. The murburn model also provides a better platform to explain the resolution, depth perception, architecture of eye and its evolution.[46]
Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)
Classical perception deems that isozyme LDH-A converts pyruvate to lactate whereas LDH-B converts lactate to pyruvate, the reaction being freely reversible via the same mechanistic route. Murburn concept corrected this erroneous perception and provided thermodynamic and structural insights to demarcate new a new pathway and mechanism for LDH functioning in liver, using DRS. Muscles have 4 folds the concentration of the same isozyme of LDH-A, which is also found in liver. Therefore, the classical explanation fails to reason why lactate must be transported to liver or mitochondria for effective recycling. Murburn concept reasons out such conundrums and also affords a new approach for understanding Warburg effect and therapy of cancer.[47]
Origin and evolution of life
Earlier perceptions considered proton/ionic gradients as the primary bioenergetic principle. In this purview, it was difficult to conceive how a purported molecular nanomotor like Complex V could evolve for ATP synthesis, at the primordial states of life's origin. Murburn concept offers effective charge separation as a simpler principle for the cell's viability as a simple chemical engine that could do useful work. The murburn view projects TMP as a side-product of cellular metabolic activity, and not as the primary driving force of cellular bioenergetics.[48][49][50]

Criticism

[edit]

The murburn concept has been used to criticize classical perceptions like Peter Mitchell’s and Paul Boyer’s chemiosmotic rotary ATP synthesis mechanism.[51][52][53] These criticisms have been called into question.[54][55] These criticisms have in turn been responded to.[56][57]

Prospects

[edit]

The late Lowell Hager (Member, NAS-USA and Professor of Biochemistry at UIUC) recognized the DRS-mediated murburn selectivity/specificity mechanism in chloroperoxidase.[58] Two books authored by respected European researchers were published in the UK that favorably discussed murburn concept.[59][60][61] Articles based in murburn concept were given cover-page credits in four annual volumes (2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020) of Biomedical Reviews (the official journal of Bulgarian Society for Cell Biology) and the 167th (December 2021) volume of Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology (Elsevier). The advocates of murburn concept have provided precepts and proof of concept for murburn models of diverse life processes (drug metabolism, cellular respiration, thermogenesis, homeostasis, photosynthesis, electrophysiology, photo-transduction in retina, lactate metabolism in liver, role of hemoglobin in erythrocytes, etc.). Their comparative analyses also address the essential theoretical criteria (thermodynamics, kinetics, mechanism, structure-function correlations, evolutionary considerations, Ockham's razor/probability, etc.) and reported experimental findings. These writings also present pan-systemic and holistic appeal of the new theory and call out the untenable nature of several classical perceptions. Thus, murburn concept is poised to expand the classical concepts of biocatalysis, biological electron transfers, metabolism and physiology, leading to the discontinuation of several unrealistic terms/ideas in classical redox enzymology (like - electron transport chain, Z-scheme, Q-cycle, Kok-Joliot cycle, chemiosmosis, proton motive force, rotary ATP synthesis, etc.) that are currently advocated in textbooks. The erstwhile terms were invented to explain redox protein activity when murburn concept was not unraveled and researchers had confined their explorations to active-site and affinity-based logic alone. Incorporating murburn concept in teaching and research is the next step in the sequence of scientific progression.

UPDATES in 2023

[edit]

(i) Post-translational and epigenetic outcomes: Since murburn processes can introduce oxidative and group transfer (halogenation, phosphorylation, hydroxylation, etc.) reactions, the various biomolecules (like proteins, DNA, matrix components, etc.) could be subjected to corresponding modifications, leading to metabolo-proteomic influences.[62]

(ii) Murburn concept explains the structure-function correlation of Na,K-ATPase.[63]

(iii) Murburn concept serves as a unifying umbrella for connecting acute-timescale cellular powering, coherence, homeostasis, electro-physiological/mechanical and sensory/response facets. Thus, it should be considered as a fundamental principle of life, along with cell theory and central dogma.[49][62]

(iv) The “auto-assembled molecular rotary” functionalisms in biology is conclusively disclaimed with murburn-centric criticisms, as both Complex V (earlier!) and bacterial flagella-aided motility are shown to be water-mobilizing systems.[64][65]

(v) The relevance of murburn concept in genetic and acquired respiratory diseases was pointed out.[Kelath Murali Manoj. What Is the Relevance of Murburn Concept in Thalassemia and Respiratory Diseases? Thalass. Rep. 2023, 13(2), 144–151; https://doi.org/10.3390/thalassrep13020013[66]].

(vi) American Institute of Physics portal publishes two-part review of murburn concept explaining multiple metabolic and physiological routines. These developments support murburn concept as a fundamental principle explaining diverse cellular functionalisms.[67][68]

In the left panel, molecular interactions involved in murburn concept are shown. A murzyme may use (generate/modulate/stabilize/utilize) DRS, which may enter into interactive equilibriums with diverse or select molecules and ions in milieu, giving rise to catalytic electron or moiety transfers, including posttranslational modifications (PTMs) of auto or hetero proteins. The central panel shows the overall systemic or macroscopic physiological overview of ECS-initiated murburn in cells leading to their functioning as SCEs. Methane (CH4) is considered as an example of nutrient input. One of its murburn products (CO2) is a voidable gas and the other product (water, H2O) is also the solvent. Owing to colligative effects, the latter is spontaneously mobilized to move out, thereby retaining cellular composition in a dynamic fashion. Physically, these processes also generate heat and turgor. Chemically, the transient DRS enable electrical activity, power otherwise non-spontaneous reactions and enable seamless coherence. The conceptual importance of murburn concept as a founding principle of life is shown in the right panel. While the vitally deterministic central dogma allows for topology/affinity based selectivity, the inevitable stochastic (based in chanced events) murburn processes complement with other parameters needed to support life.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Venkatachalam A, Parashar A, Manoj KM (December 2016). "Functioning of drug-metabolizing microsomal cytochrome P450s: In silico probing of proteins suggests that the distal heme 'active site' pocket plays a relatively 'passive role' in some enzyme-substrate interactions". In Silico Pharmacology. 4 (1): 2. doi:10.1186/s40203-016-0016-7. PMC 4760962. PMID 26894412.
  2. ^ Manoj KM, Gade SK, Venkatachalam A, Gideon DA (2016). "Electron transfer amongst flavo- and hemo-proteins: diffusible species effect the relay processes, not protein–protein binding". RSC Advances. 6 (29): 24121–24129. Bibcode:2016RSCAd...624121M. doi:10.1039/C5RA26122H.
  3. ^ Manoj KM, Parashar A, Gade SK, Venkatachalam A (23 June 2016). "Functioning of Microsomal Cytochrome P450s: Murburn Concept Explains the Metabolism of Xenobiotics in Hepatocytes". Frontiers in Pharmacology. 7: 161. doi:10.3389/fphar.2016.00161. PMC 4918403. PMID 27445805.
  4. ^ a b Periodic Videos (2010-07-15), Fluorine - Periodic Table of Videos, retrieved 2019-03-31
  5. ^ Manoj KM (22 March 2018). "Debunking Chemiosmosis and Proposing Murburn Concept as the Operative Principle for Cellular Respiration". Biomedical Reviews. 28: 31. arXiv:1703.05827. doi:10.14748/bmr.v28.4450.
  6. ^ Murali Manoj K (August 2006). "Chlorinations catalyzed by chloroperoxidase occur via diffusible intermediate(s) and the reaction components play multiple roles in the overall process". Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics. 1764 (8): 1325–1339. doi:10.1016/j.bbapap.2006.05.012. PMID 16870515.
  7. ^ Fersht A (1999). Structure and mechanism in protein science: a guide to enzyme catalysis and protein folding. W.H. Freeman. pp. Enzyme Structure and Mechanism. ISBN 0-7167-3268-8.
  8. ^ Manoj KM (December 2018). "The ubiquitous biochemical logic of murburn concept". Biomedical Reviews. 29: 89. doi:10.14748/bmr.v29.5854. ISSN 1314-1929.
  9. ^ Jacob VD, Manoj KM (2019-09-03). "Are adipocytes and ROS villains, or are they protagonists in the drama of life? The murburn perspective". Adipobiology. 10: 7. doi:10.14748/adipo.v10.6534. ISSN 1313-3705.
  10. ^ Nicholls DG (February 2004). "Mitochondrial membrane potential and aging". Aging Cell. 3 (1): 35–40. doi:10.1111/j.1474-9728.2003.00079.x. PMID 14965354. S2CID 27979429.
  11. ^ a b Manoj KM, Gideon DA (June 2022). "Structural foundations for explaining the physiological roles of murzymes embedded in diverse phospholipid membranes". Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes. 1864 (10): 183981. doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2022.183981. PMID 35690100. S2CID 249533035.
  12. ^ Parashar A, Venkatachalam A, Gideon DA, Manoj KM (December 2014). "Cyanide does more to inhibit heme enzymes, than merely serving as an active-site ligand". Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 455 (3–4): 190–193. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.10.137. PMID 25449264.
  13. ^ Manoj KM, Soman V (February 2020). "Classical and murburn explanations for acute toxicity of cyanide in aerobic respiration: A personal perspective". Toxicology. 432: 152369. doi:10.1016/j.tox.2020.152369. PMID 32007488. S2CID 211013240.
  14. ^ Cytochrome P450: Structure, Mechanism, and Biochemistry (4 ed.). Springer International Publishing. 2015. ISBN 9783319121079.
  15. ^ Dunford BH (1999). Heme peroxidases. John Wiley. ISBN 0-471-24244-6.
  16. ^ Dawson JH (April 1988). "Probing structure-function relations in heme-containing oxygenases and peroxidases". Science. 240 (4851): 433–439. Bibcode:1988Sci...240..433D. doi:10.1126/science.3358128. PMID 3358128.
  17. ^ Manoj KM, Gade SK, Mathew L (October 2010). "Cytochrome P450 reductase: a harbinger of diffusible reduced oxygen species". PLOS ONE. 5 (10): e13272. Bibcode:2010PLoSO...513272M. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013272. PMC 2954143. PMID 20967245.
  18. ^ Manoj KM, Parashar A, Venkatachalam A, Goyal S, Singh PG, Gade SK, et al. (June 2016). "Atypical profiles and modulations of heme-enzymes catalyzed outcomes by low amounts of diverse additives suggest diffusible radicals' obligatory involvement in such redox reactions". Biochimie. 125: 91–111. doi:10.1016/j.biochi.2016.03.003. PMID 26969799.
  19. ^ Reina RG, Leri AC, Myneni SC (February 2004). "Cl K-edge X-ray spectroscopic investigation of enzymatic formation of organochlorines in weathering plant material". Environmental Science & Technology. 38 (3): 783–789. Bibcode:2004EnST...38..783R. doi:10.1021/es0347336. PMID 14968865.
  20. ^ Ortiz-Bermúdez P, Srebotnik E, Hammel KE (August 2003). "Chlorination and cleavage of lignin structures by fungal chloroperoxidases". Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 69 (8): 5015–5018. Bibcode:2003ApEnM..69.5015O. doi:10.1128/AEM.69.8.5015-5018.2003. PMC 169094. PMID 12902304.
  21. ^ Niedan V, Pavasars I, Oberg G (September 2000). "Chloroperoxidase-mediated chlorination of aromatic groups in fulvic acid". Chemosphere. 41 (5): 779–785. Bibcode:2000Chmsp..41..779N. doi:10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00471-3. PMID 10834381.
  22. ^ Carlsen L, Lassen P (July 1992). "Enzymatically mediated formation of chlorinated humic acids". Organic Geochemistry. 18 (4): 477–480. Bibcode:1992OrGeo..18..477C. doi:10.1016/0146-6380(92)90110-J.
  23. ^ Walter B, Ballschmiter K (January 1991). "Biohalogenation as a source of halogenated anisoles in air". Chemosphere. 22 (5–6): 557–567. Bibcode:1991Chmsp..22..557W. doi:10.1016/0045-6535(91)90067-N.
  24. ^ Manoj KM, Hager LP (March 2008). "Chloroperoxidase, a janus enzyme". Biochemistry. 47 (9): 2997–3003. doi:10.1021/bi7022656. PMID 18220360.
  25. ^ Guengerich FP, Yoshimoto FK (July 2018). "Formation and Cleavage of C-C Bonds by Enzymatic Oxidation-Reduction Reactions". Chemical Reviews. 118 (14): 6573–6655. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00031. PMC 6339258. PMID 29932643.
  26. ^ "Abstracts from the 20Th North American Issx Meeting". Drug Metabolism Reviews. 48 Suppl 1 (sup1): 1. July 2016. doi:10.1080/03602532.2016.1191848. PMID 27418298. S2CID 32759835.
  27. ^ Parashar A, Manoj KM (2021-06-17). "Murburn Precepts for Cytochrome P450 Mediated Drug/Xenobiotic Metabolism and Homeostasis". Current Drug Metabolism. 22 (4): 315–326. doi:10.2174/1389200222666210118102230. PMID 33461459. S2CID 231641656.
  28. ^ Manoj KM, Parashar A, David Jacob V, Ramasamy S (October 2019). "Aerobic respiration: proof of concept for the oxygen-centric murburn perspective". Journal of Biomolecular Structure & Dynamics. 37 (17): 4542–4556. arXiv:1806.02310. doi:10.1080/07391102.2018.1552896. PMID 30488771. S2CID 46944819.
  29. ^ Manoj KM, Gideon DA, Jacob VD (2018-12-15). "Murburn scheme for mitochondrial thermogenesis". Biomedical Reviews. 29: 73. doi:10.14748/bmr.v29.5852. ISSN 1314-1929.
  30. ^ Manoj KM, Soman V, David Jacob V, Parashar A, Gideon DA, Kumar M, et al. (November 2019). "Chemiosmotic and murburn explanations for aerobic respiration: Predictive capabilities, structure-function correlations and chemico-physical logic". Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 676: 108128. doi:10.1016/j.abb.2019.108128. PMID 31622585. S2CID 204772669.
  31. ^ Gideon DA, Nirusimhan V, E JC, Sudarsha K, Manoj KM (May 2021). "Mechanism of electron transfers mediated by cytochromes c and b5 in mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum: classical and murburn perspectives". Journal of Biomolecular Structure & Dynamics. 40 (19): 9235–9252. doi:10.1080/07391102.2021.1925154. PMID 33998974. S2CID 234747822.
  32. ^ a b Parashar A, Jacob VD, Gideon DA, Manoj KM (May 2021). "Hemoglobin catalyzes ATP-synthesis in human erythrocytes: a murburn model". Journal of Biomolecular Structure & Dynamics. 40 (19): 8783–8795. doi:10.1080/07391102.2021.1925592. PMID 33998971. S2CID 234746839.
  33. ^ Manoj KM, Bazhin NM (December 2021). "The murburn precepts for aerobic respiration and redox homeostasis". Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology. 167: 104–120. doi:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2021.05.010. PMID 34118265. S2CID 235418090.
  34. ^ Manoj KM, Gideon DA, Jaeken L (March 2022). "Why do cells need oxygen? Insights from mitochondrial composition and function". Cell Biology International. 46 (3): 344–358. doi:10.1002/cbin.11746. PMID 34918410. S2CID 245263092.
  35. ^ Jacob VD, Manoj KM (2019-09-03). "Are adipocytes and ROS villains, or are they protagonists in the drama of life? The murburn perspective". Adipobiology. 10: 7. doi:10.14748/adipo.v10.6534. ISSN 1313-3705. S2CID 243456830.
  36. ^ Chirumbolo S, Bjørklund G (January 2017). "PERM Hypothesis: The Fundamental Machinery Able to Elucidate the Role of Xenobiotics and Hormesis in Cell Survival and Homeostasis". International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 18 (1): 165. doi:10.3390/ijms18010165. PMC 5297798. PMID 28098843.
  37. ^ Parashar A, Gideon DA, Manoj KM (9 May 2018). "Murburn Concept: A Molecular Explanation for Hormetic and Idiosyncratic Dose Responses". Dose-Response. 16 (2): 1559325818774421. doi:10.1177/1559325818774421. PMC 5946624. PMID 29770107.
  38. ^ Gideon DA, Nirusimhan V, Manoj KM (March 2022). "Are plastocyanin and ferredoxin specific electron carriers or generic redox capacitors? Classical and murburn perspectives on two photosynthetic proteins". Journal of Biomolecular Structure & Dynamics. 40 (5): 1995–2009. doi:10.1080/07391102.2020.1835715. PMID 33073701. S2CID 224780973.
  39. ^ Manoj KM, Manekkathodi A (March 2021). "Light's interaction with pigments in chloroplasts: The murburn perspective". Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology. 5: 100015. doi:10.1016/j.jpap.2020.100015.
  40. ^ Manoj KM, Gideon DA, Parashar A (March 2021). "What is the Role of Lipid Membrane-embedded Quinones in Mitochondria and Chloroplasts? Chemiosmotic Q-cycle versus Murburn Reaction Perspective". Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics. 79 (1): 3–10. doi:10.1007/s12013-020-00945-y. PMID 32989571. S2CID 222155532.
  41. ^ Manoj KM, Bazhin NM, Jacob VD, Parashar A, Gideon DA, Manekkathodi A (July 2021). "Structure-function correlations and system dynamics in oxygenic photosynthesis: classical perspectives and murburn precepts". Journal of Biomolecular Structure & Dynamics. 40 (21): 10997–11023. doi:10.1080/07391102.2021.1953606. PMID 34323659. S2CID 236497938.
  42. ^ Manoj KM, Gideon DA, Parashar A, Nirusimhan V, Annadurai P, Jacob VD, Manekkathodi A (July 2021). "Validating the predictions of murburn model for oxygenic photosynthesis: Analyses of ligand-binding to protein complexes and cross-system comparisons". Journal of Biomolecular Structure & Dynamics. 40 (21): 11024–11056. doi:10.1080/07391102.2021.1953607. PMID 34328391. S2CID 236516782.
  43. ^ Manoj KM, Gideon DA, Jaeken L (March 2022). "Interaction of membrane-embedded cytochrome b-complexes with quinols: Classical Q-cycle and murburn model". Cell Biochemistry and Function. 40 (2): 118–126. doi:10.1002/cbf.3682. PMID 35026863. S2CID 245933089.
  44. ^ Manoj KM, Bazhin N, Tamagawa H (January 2022). "The murburn precepts for cellular ionic homeostasis and electrophysiology". Journal of Cellular Physiology. 237 (1): 804–814. doi:10.1002/jcp.30547. PMID 34378795. S2CID 236977991.
  45. ^ Manoj KM, Tamagawa H (January 2022). "Critical analysis of explanations for cellular homeostasis and electrophysiology from murburn perspective". Journal of Cellular Physiology. 237 (1): 421–435. doi:10.1002/jcp.30578. PMID 34515340. S2CID 237491394.
  46. ^ Manoj KM, Tamagawa H, Bazhin N, Jaeken L, Nirusimhan V, Faraci F, Gideon DA (June 2022). "Murburn model of vision: Precepts and proof of concept". Journal of Cellular Physiology. 237 (8): 3338–3355. doi:10.1002/jcp.30786. PMID 35662017. S2CID 249396061.
  47. ^ Manoj KM, Nirusimhan V, Parashar A, Edward J, Gideon DA (March 2022). "Murburn precepts for lactic-acidosis, Cori cycle, and Warburg effect: Interactive dynamics of dehydrogenases, protons, and oxygen". Journal of Cellular Physiology. 237 (3): 1902–1922. doi:10.1002/jcp.30661. PMID 34927737. S2CID 245377752.
  48. ^ Manoj KM (2019-05-01). "Torday's prognosis for aging and mortality: more evolution and better life!". Biomedical Reviews. 30: 23. doi:10.14748/bmr.v30.6384. ISSN 1314-1929. S2CID 241642436.
  49. ^ a b Murali Manoj K, Laurent J (May 2023). "Synthesis of theories on cellular powering, coherence, homeostasis and electro-mechanics". Journal of Cellular Physiology. 238 (5): 931–953. doi:10.1002/jcp.31000. PMID 36976847. S2CID 257773255.
  50. ^ Manoj KM, Bazhin NM, Tamagawa H, Jaeken L, Parashar A (April 2022). "The physiological role of complex V in ATP synthesis: Murzyme functioning is viable whereas rotary conformation change model is untenable". Journal of Biomolecular Structure & Dynamics. 41 (9): 3993–4012. doi:10.1080/07391102.2022.2060307. PMID 35394896. S2CID 248049778.
  51. ^ Manoj KM (2018-12-25). "Aerobic Respiration: Criticism of the Proton-centric Explanation Involving Rotary Adenosine Triphosphate Synthesis, Chemiosmosis Principle, Proton Pumps and Electron Transport Chain". Biochemistry Insights. 11: 1178626418818442. doi:10.1177/1178626418818442. PMC 6311555. PMID 30643418.
  52. ^ Gideon DM, Jacob VD, Manoj KM (2019-05-01). "2020: murburn concept heralds a new era in cellular bioenergetics". Biomedical Reviews. 30: 89. doi:10.14748/bmr.v30.6390. ISSN 1314-1929.
  53. ^ Manoj KM (February 2020). "Refutation of the cation-centric torsional ATP synthesis model and advocating murburn scheme for mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation". Biophysical Chemistry. 257: 106278. doi:10.1016/j.bpc.2019.106278. PMID 31767207. S2CID 208300209.
  54. ^ Nath S (February 2020). "Consolidation of Nath's torsional mechanism of ATP synthesis and two-ion theory of energy coupling in oxidative phosphorylation and photophosphorylation". Biophysical Chemistry. 257: 106279. doi:10.1016/j.bpc.2019.106279. PMID 31757522. S2CID 208235224.
  55. ^ Silva PJ (September 2020). "Chemiosmotic misunderstandings". Biophysical Chemistry. 264: 106424. doi:10.1016/j.bpc.2020.106424. hdl:10284/8815. PMID 32717593. S2CID 220839928.
  56. ^ Manoj KM (January 2020). "Murburn concept: a paradigm shift in cellular metabolism and physiology". Biomolecular Concepts. 11 (1): 7–22. doi:10.1515/bmc-2020-0002. PMID 31961793.
  57. ^ Manoj KM (May 2020). "In defense of the murburn explanation for aerobic respiration". Biomedical Reviews. 31: 135–148. doi:10.14748/bmr.v31.7713. S2CID 234957394.
  58. ^ Hager LP (May 2010). "A lifetime of playing with enzymes". The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 285 (20): 14852–14860. doi:10.1074/jbc.X110.121905. PMC 2865333. PMID 20215109.
  59. ^ Chaldakov GN (2020-05-07). "A sample copy of the textbook Principles of Cell and Tissue Biology". Biomedical Reviews. 31: 165. doi:10.14748/bmr.v31.7716. ISSN 1314-1929. S2CID 234914744.
  60. ^ Chaldakov GN. Principles of Cell Biology.
  61. ^ Jaeken, Laurent (2021). The Coacervate-Coherence Nature of Life: Fundamentals of Cell Physiology Kindle Edition. BioMedES.
  62. ^ a b Manoj, Kelath Murali (2023-01-30). "Murburn posttranslational modifications of proteins: Cellular redox processes and murzyme-mediated metabolo-proteomics". Journal of Cellular Physiology. 239 (3): e30954. doi:10.1002/jcp.30954. ISSN 0021-9541. PMID 36716112. S2CID 256388781.
  63. ^ Manoj, Kelath Murali; Gideon, Daniel A.; Bazhin, Nikolai M.; Tamagawa, Hirohisa; Nirusimhan, Vijay; Kavdia, Mahendra; Jaeken, Laurent (January 2023). "Na,K-ATPase: A murzyme facilitating thermodynamic equilibriums at the membrane-interface". Journal of Cellular Physiology. 238 (1): 109–136. doi:10.1002/jcp.30925. ISSN 0021-9541. PMID 36502470. S2CID 254584996.
  64. ^ Manoj, Kelath Murali; Jacob, Vivian David; Kavdia, Mahendra; Tamagawa, Hirohisa; Jaeken, Laurent; Soman, Vidhu (2023-12-29). "Questioning rotary functionality in the bacterial flagellar system and proposing a murburn model for motility". Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics. 41 (24): 15691–15714. doi:10.1080/07391102.2023.2191146. ISSN 0739-1102. PMID 36970840. S2CID 257765065.
  65. ^ Manoj, Kelath Murali; Gideon, Daniel Andrew; Soman, Vidhu (2023-06-22). Consolidation of the murburn model of flagella-aided motility in bacteria (Report). Open Science Framework. doi:10.31219/osf.io/egdps.
  66. ^ Manoj, Kelath Murali (2023-05-12). "What Is the Relevance of Murburn Concept in Thalassemia and Respiratory Diseases?". Thalassemia Reports. 13 (2): 144–151. doi:10.3390/thalassrep13020013. ISSN 2039-4365.
  67. ^ Manoj, Kelath Murali; Jaeken, Laurent; Bazhin, Nikolai Mikhailovich; Tamagawa, Hirohisa; Kavdia, Mahendra; Manekkathodi, Afsal (2023-12-01). "Murburn concept in cellular function and bioenergetics, Part 1: Understanding murzymes at the molecular level". AIP Advances. 13 (12). Bibcode:2023AIPA...13l0702M. doi:10.1063/5.0171857. ISSN 2158-3226.
  68. ^ Manoj, Kelath Murali; Jaeken, Laurent; Bazhin, Nikolai Mikhailovich; Tamagawa, Hirohisa; Gideon, Daniel Andrew; Kavdia, Mahendra (2023-12-01). "Murburn concept in cellular function and bioenergetics, Part 2: Understanding integrations-translations from molecular to macroscopic levels". AIP Advances. 13 (12). Bibcode:2023AIPA...13l0701M. doi:10.1063/5.0171860. ISSN 2158-3226.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Murburn_concept&oldid=1247845773"