Module talk:Political party
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Political party module. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This module does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Module:Political party is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible module. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit.
|
Edit request 7 September 2024
[edit]This edit request to Module:Political party/S has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Description of suggested change:
["Samajwadi Party"] = {abbrev = "SP", color = "#E3265B", shortname = "Samajwadi",}
["Communist Party of India (Marxist)"] = {abbrev = "CPI(M)", color = "#F0001C", shortname = "Marxist",}
["Communist Party of India"] = {abbrev = "CPI", color = "#B71C1C", shortname = "Communist",}
I suggest to change this colors they make problem in identifying. Interchange CPI and CPI(M) color.
49.47.141.165 (talk) 05:56, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Integration with Wikidata
[edit]Hi,
I am interested in the use of Wikidata data in Wikipedia, especially for infoboxes. The core idea, of course, is to avoid duplication of work and there are many instances where this could be beneficial.
Has this been discussed previously? Are there initiatives in this sense? Julius Schwarz (talk) 18:53, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Are you talking about this in regard specifically to this module, or are you just asking for general opinions? Primefac (talk) 19:54, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- This discussion started in User talk:Julius Schwarz#Linking party colours to Wikidata, after they started replacing the use of Template:Party color with links to Wikidata (example 1, example 2). Brainiac242 (talk) 20:15, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- From a "how easy is this to figure out for a relatively new editor", I am not really a fan of those example changes. My own personal bugbear with WD has always been how bloody obscure and unintuitive everything is; if I saw those edits in the wild I would have no idea what the WD calls were doing or even how I would check what values they access. Primefac (talk) 10:07, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- I guess this can be a broader discussion, but my question is specifically for this module, since this is in relation to what I mostly edit. I have worked to keep both Wikipedia and Wikidata up to date, and it seems like a lot of duplication, so I am interested in pushing for more integration -- maybe starting with pilot initiatives -- and the first question is whether this has been attempted or discussed before. Julius Schwarz (talk) 07:28, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- It has been discussed before, mostly in relation to biographical infoboxes, where the consensus is that WD is to be used very sparingly if at all because of the long-standing issues WD has with verifiability and sourcing as it relates to BLP-related matters. I haven't seen any of those types of discussions pop up lately so I honestly couldn't tell you the general feeling about WD, but my general advice would be that if you see duplication between the projects, get consensus before going around and mass-changing them; there are still a lot of folks who will either find the edits unnecessary or (for some individuals) outright problematic. Primefac (talk) 10:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the feedback @Primefac and fair points. I have already reverted changes after a discussion made me realise I had been too hasty. I also tested some integration and it does come with a few challenges, from the point of view of the layout already. Julius Schwarz (talk) 11:45, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- It has been discussed before, mostly in relation to biographical infoboxes, where the consensus is that WD is to be used very sparingly if at all because of the long-standing issues WD has with verifiability and sourcing as it relates to BLP-related matters. I haven't seen any of those types of discussions pop up lately so I honestly couldn't tell you the general feeling about WD, but my general advice would be that if you see duplication between the projects, get consensus before going around and mass-changing them; there are still a lot of folks who will either find the edits unnecessary or (for some individuals) outright problematic. Primefac (talk) 10:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- This discussion started in User talk:Julius Schwarz#Linking party colours to Wikidata, after they started replacing the use of Template:Party color with links to Wikidata (example 1, example 2). Brainiac242 (talk) 20:15, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Edit request 13 September 2024 (La France Insoumise)
[edit]This edit request to Module:Political party/L has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Description of suggested change:
La France Insoumise's red is currently too similar to the reds of PS and PCF for my liking, I'd like to propose a return to its more official purple , the party's article describes the red as "customary", but in almost all media I personally see, purple is more commonly used, plus, as I said, the colour has poor contrast with the country's other left-wing and left-leaning parties' colours. What are people's thoughts on this?
Diff:
− | ["La France Insoumise"] = {abbrev = "LFI", color = | + | ["La France Insoumise"] = {abbrev = "LFI", color = "#56277E", shortname = "",}, |
– GlowstoneUnknown (Talk) 06:12, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- I notified Wikipedia talk:WikiProject France, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics/Political parties, and Talk:La France Insoumise of this request on 27 September. If there is no reply by 4 October, I think we can safely assume this is uncontrovertial. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 16:09, 1 October 2024 (UTC) - Done Sceptre (talk) 23:20, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
Edit request 13 September 2024
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Description of suggested change: Make the colour for the Old Windsor Residents' Association #019642
Diff:
− | + | ["Old Windsor Residents Association"] = {abbrev = "OWRA", color = "#019642", shortname = "",}, |
Infinite Hydra (talk) 18:26, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Edit request 13 September 2024
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Description of suggested change:
Could you please update the colour listed for the West Dunbartonshire Community Party in line with the party colour listed on its page, taken from its logo.
Diff:
− | ["West Dunbartonshire Community Party"] = {abbrev = "", color = | + | ["West Dunbartonshire Community Party"] = {abbrev = "", color = "#862C8A", shortname = "West Dunbartonshire Community",}, |
WanderingPlaywright (talk) 19:04, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Dark mode compatibility
[edit]Any chance this can be updated to make it friendlier to dark mode? This could be as simple as using class="mw-no-invert"
to avoid colors becoming washed out/reversed, but curious what others would think would be a good solution here. —Locke Cole • t • c 17:02, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Edit request 16 September 2024
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Description of suggested change: Make the colour for the West Windsor Residents Association #3863C1
Diff:
− | + | ["West Windsor Residents Association"] = {abbrev = "WWRA", color = "#3863C1", shortname = "",}, |
Infinite Hydra (talk) 16:35, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. I see that they use that color for links on their website, but it's not in their official logo. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:53, 27 September 2024 (UTC)- Never mind about the colour then, I get what you're saying. Would you still be able to add the party's abbreviation? Infinite Hydra (talk) 15:57, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Infinite Hydra I had to modify the module to allow it to take "default" as the color value, but this is now Done. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 16:25, 1 October 2024 (UTC)- Thank you Infinite Hydra (talk) 16:52, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Infinite Hydra I had to modify the module to allow it to take "default" as the color value, but this is now Done. --Ahecht (TALK
- Never mind about the colour then, I get what you're saying. Would you still be able to add the party's abbreviation? Infinite Hydra (talk) 15:57, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Colorado Center Party
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Description of suggested change:
The Colorado Center Party has values for its short name and color in the module, but neither show up on articles such as 2024 Colorado House of Representatives election#District 34. I have not a clue as to why it isn't working. If someone could make the Colorado Center Party appear in election boxes with the shortname "center" and a purple hue, that'd be great! FoamingInDenver (talk) 20:47, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- This isn't an edit request, it's a request to figure out what's wrong with the template. For what it's worth the party is listed in /C, so it's likely an issue with either implementation or the template call on the article in question. I'll try to take a look but other eyes would be appreciated. Primefac (talk) 15:07, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- Huh... it was the module... someone added an extra bit of code that caused it to point to the wrong place (which incidentally didn't exist).
- Fixed the problem and it looks like it should be working as intended. Primefac (talk) 15:13, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the help! FoamingInDenver (talk) 17:00, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 16 October 2024
[edit]This edit request to Module:Political party/G has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I suggest the color change of Gerindra party (Indonesia) to color #B79164. Because it's similar to Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDIP) MesinKetik (talk) 08:58, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Change UDF color
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Description of suggested change: ["United Democratic Alliance"] = {abbrev = "UDF", color = "#FFD700", shortname = "UDF",} Diff:
− | + | ["United Democratic Alliance"] = {abbrev = "UDF", color = "#FFD700", shortname = "UDF",} |
हिन्दू खतरे में हैं (talk) 10:19, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Primace हिन्दू खतरे में हैं (talk) 10:19, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- @हिन्दू खतरे में हैं Did you mean UDA or UDF? There are currently five political parties named "United Democratic Alliance" supported in the template (they're the ones listed at United Democratic Alliance) and a handful that are abbreviated UDF. Based on your username, I'm assuming you're referring to United Democratic Alliance (Nagaland), but you'll need to specify. In addition, you'll also need to provide a source that the party uses that color. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 16:27, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- @हिन्दू खतरे में हैं Did you mean UDA or UDF? There are currently five political parties named "United Democratic Alliance" supported in the template (they're the ones listed at United Democratic Alliance) and a handful that are abbreviated UDF. Based on your username, I'm assuming you're referring to United Democratic Alliance (Nagaland), but you'll need to specify. In addition, you'll also need to provide a source that the party uses that color. --Ahecht (TALK
- Not done for now: User is sock-blocked, so they can't respond. If anyone knows which one it is with a source, feel free to reopen. SWinxy (talk) 18:11, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Edit request 11 November 2024
[edit]This edit request to Module:Political party/D has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Description of suggested change: Please add the following Northern Ireland Assembly designations:
Designated Unionist - #448BEE
Designated Nationalist - #1B9750
Designated Other - #808080
Thank you. PointUnderstander (talk) 00:06, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Do you have a reliable source we can cite for the change? - Adolphus79 (talk) 20:03, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Primefac (talk) 12:39, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Edit request 23 November 2024
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Description of suggested change: Should the Bucktails not be added? They ran dozens of candidates for Congress from New York and won several elections. See here. I have no idea what the colors would be or if there should be a separate entry for their rivals, the Clintonians, though I suspect those were basically just the mainline Democratic-Republicans.
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:46, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
Edit Request 23 November 2024
[edit]This edit request to Module:Political party/N has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
This is to inform that Nationalist Congress Party has changed the color from Pacific Blue to Pink (#FFC0CB). So change the party color as soon as possible. For reference pls see the page [1]. Thank You. Brandon Perker (talk) 12:11, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Already done Primefac (talk) 12:40, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
References
Edit Request 26 November 2023
[edit]This edit request to Module:Political party/P has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add Progressive Democratic Front (Andhra Pradesh) with #DB5353 456legendtalk 06:20, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Done Primefac (talk) 12:43, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Primefac, can you please add the abbreviation in the module for this party: PDF 456legendtalk 10:43, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- Sure. Primefac (talk) 22:00, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Primefac, can you please add the abbreviation in the module for this party: PDF 456legendtalk 10:43, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Edit request, JLKM party color
[edit]JLKM use #7FFF00 color (not #E3F899) in their party flag. Ritwik Mahatat@lk 20:46, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Ahecht Ritwik Mahatat@lk 06:27, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- @RITWIK MAHATA https://jlkmparty.org/ uses #007236 and #0d5a30 . I don't see #7FFF00 anywhere. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:04, 27 November 2024 (UTC)- See their party flag. Ritwik Mahatat@lk 15:13, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Primefac Ritwik Mahatat@lk 13:12, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Ahecht
- Here Ritwik Mahatat@lk 19:31, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- @RITWIK MAHATA That's not the flag they're currently using on their website. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 05:58, 30 November 2024 (UTC)- See partywise result section of Election Commission of India. Ritwik Mahatat@lk 07:00, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- @RITWIK MAHATA That's not the flag they're currently using on their website. --Ahecht (TALK
- See their party flag. Ritwik Mahatat@lk 15:13, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- @RITWIK MAHATA https://jlkmparty.org/ uses #007236 and #0d5a30 . I don't see #7FFF00 anywhere. --Ahecht (TALK
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 27 November 2024
[edit]This edit request to Module:Political party/A has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Aontú (Ireland) Colour should be reverted to 47532F. Along with all other edits to the colours of Irish political parties. Dyflinn (talk) 22:27, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Already done Primefac (talk) 12:44, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 29 November 2024
[edit]It is requested that an edit be made to the extended-confirmed-protected module at Module:Political party/T. (edit · history · last · links · transclusion count · protection log) This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".
The edit may be made by any extended confirmed user. Remember to change the |
37.76.20.78 (talk) 19:41, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Tisza Party #ED4551 > #112866
For languages not using latin
[edit]Hi, I am trying to do Module:Political party/ submodules in cyrillic. How to do that? Enkhsaihan2005 (talk) 08:25, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- How to code Module:Political party that it requires cyrillic submodules Enkhsaihan2005 (talk) 08:28, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- This module is split into submodules based on the letters of the alphabet, if only because having one module with all of the parties would just be too massive. I suspect you could do something similar for Cyrillic, i.e. have one submodule for each letter that a party starts with. Everything else should follow the same rules from there. Primefac (talk) 12:41, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- The problem is in cyrillic it doesn't work Enkhsaihan2005 (talk) 20:20, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- What isn't working? Primefac (talk) 12:50, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- I have to put every political party into Module:Political party/1 because it wants only latin letters (for example I created Module:Political party/В etc and it isn't working) Enkhsaihan2005 (talk) 14:37, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Interesting. I am surprised
getFirstLetter(party)
only works for Latin, but if that is the case then I do not know how to get around that issue. I have cross-posted to a few other places, hopefully someone that knows will be able to help. Primefac (talk) 14:54, 8 December 2024 (UTC)- Change line 18 to:
if mw.ustring.match(index, '%A') then
string.match()
works on bytes, not unicode characters.- —Trappist the monk (talk) 15:11, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Actually, all of the string functions should be replaced, like this. If that is not done, the module will fail to fetch color data. Snævar (talk) 18:17, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, sort of.
return string.upper(index)
– certainly; I missed that onetext = text:match('(%S.-)%s*$')
– this just trims leading/trailing ascii whitespace ("\t\r\n\f\v
")if out_type == 'color' and string.find(return_value, '#') then
–#
is an ascii characterreturn_value = string.gsub(return_value, '#', '#')
–#
is an ascii character
- For those latter three, no need for the slower mw.ustring functions.
- —Trappist the monk (talk) 19:08, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, sort of.
- Actually, all of the string functions should be replaced, like this. If that is not done, the module will fail to fetch color data. Snævar (talk) 18:17, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Change line 18 to:
- Interesting. I am surprised
- I have to put every political party into Module:Political party/1 because it wants only latin letters (for example I created Module:Political party/В etc and it isn't working) Enkhsaihan2005 (talk) 14:37, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- What isn't working? Primefac (talk) 12:50, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- The problem is in cyrillic it doesn't work Enkhsaihan2005 (talk) 20:20, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- This module is split into submodules based on the letters of the alphabet, if only because having one module with all of the parties would just be too massive. I suspect you could do something similar for Cyrillic, i.e. have one submodule for each letter that a party starts with. Everything else should follow the same rules from there. Primefac (talk) 12:41, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Edit request (JLKM party color)
[edit]JLKM use #7FFF00 color (not #E3F899) in their party flag. For party color see partywise result section. Ritwik Mahatat@lk 20:50, 4 December 2024 (UTC)