Jump to content

Michael Witzel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Michael E. J. Witzel)

Michael Witzel
Born (1943-07-18) July 18, 1943 (age 81)
Schwiebus, Germany (modern Świebodzin, Poland)
NationalityAmerican, German
Occupation(s)Philologist, linguist, Indologist
Academic work
InstitutionsHarvard University
Websitemichaelwitzel.org

Michael Witzel (born July 18, 1943) is a German-American philologist, comparative mythologist and Indologist. Witzel is the Wales Professor of Sanskrit at Harvard University and the editor of the Harvard Oriental Series (volumes 50–100). He has significantly researched a number of Indian sacred texts, particularly the Vedas.

Biography

[edit]

Michael Witzel was born July 18, 1943, in Schwiebus, Germany (modern Świebodzin, Poland). He studied indology in Germany from 1965 to 1971 under Paul Thieme, H.-P. Schmidt, K. Hoffmann, and J. Narten, as well as in Nepal (1972 to 1973) under Mīmāmsaka Jununath Pandit.[1] From 1972 to 1978, he led the Nepal-German Manuscript Preservation Project and the Nepal Research Centre in Kathmandu.[citation needed]

He has taught at Tübingen (1972), Leiden (1978–1986), and at Harvard (1986~2022), and has been the Wales Research professor (2022-): he had visiting appointments at Kyoto (twice), Paris (twice), and Tokyo (twice). He has been teaching Sanskrit since 1972.[citation needed]

Witzel is editor-in-chief of the Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies[2] and the Harvard Oriental Series.[3] Witzel has been president of the Association for the Study of Language in Prehistory since 1999,[4] as well as of the International Association for Comparative Mythology since 2006.[5]

He was elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2003 and was elected honorary member of the German Oriental Society in 2009.[6] In 2013 he was appointed Cabot fellow of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences at Harvard University, receiving recognition for his book on comparative mythology.[7]

Philological research

[edit]

The main topics of scholarly research are the dialects of Vedic Sanskrit,[8] old Indian history,[9][10] the development of Vedic religion,[11] and the linguistic prehistory of the Indian subcontinent.[12]

Early works and translations

[edit]

Witzel's early philological work deals with the oldest texts of India, the Vedas, their manuscripts and their traditional recitation; it included some editions and translations of unknown texts (1972).[13] such as the Katha Aranyaka.[14] He has begun, together with T. Goto et al. a new translation of the Rigveda into German (Books I-II, 2007, Books III-V 2012), Books VI-VII (2022).[15]

Vedic texts, Indian history, and the emergence of the Kuru kingdom

[edit]
See also: Kuru Kingdom

After 1987, he has increasingly focused on the localization of Vedic texts (1987) and the evidence contained in them for early Indian history, notably that of the Rgveda and the following period, represented by the Black Yajurveda Samhitas and the Brahmanas. This work has been done in close collaboration with Harvard archaeologists such as R. Meadow, with whom he has also co-taught. Witzel aims at indicating the emergence of the Kuru Kingdom in the Delhi area (1989, 1995, 1997, 2003), its seminal culture and its political dominance, as well as studying the origin of late Vedic polities[16] and the first Indian empire in eastern North India (1995, 1997, 2003, 2010).

He studied at length the various Vedic recensions (śākhā)[17] and their importance for the geographical spread of Vedic culture across North India and beyond.[18] This resulted in book-length investigations of Vedic dialects (1989), the development of the Vedic canon (1997),[19] and of Old India as such (2003, reprint 2010).

Pre-Vedic substrate languages of Northern India

[edit]

The linguistic aspect of earliest Indian history has been explored in a number of papers (1993,[20] 1999,[21][22] 2000, 2001, 2006,[23] 2009)[24] dealing with the pre-Vedic substrate languages of Northern India.[25] These result in a substantial amount of loan words from a prefixing language ("Para-Munda") similar to but not identical with Austroasiatic (Munda, Khasi, etc.) as well as from other unidentified languages. In addition, a considerable number of Vedic and Old Iranian words are traced back to a Central Asian substrate language (1999, 2003, 2004, 2006).[26] This research is constantly updated, in collaboration with F. Southworth and D. Stampe, by the SARVA project[27] including its South Asian substrate dictionary.[28]

Comparative mythology

[edit]

In recent years, he has explored the links between old Indian, Eurasian and other mythologies (1990,[29] 2001–2010)[30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] resulting in a new scheme of historical comparative mythology[38] that covers most of Eurasia and the Americas ("Laurasia", cf. the related Harvard, Kyoto, Beijing, Edinburgh, Ravenstein (Netherlands), Tokyo, Strasbourg, St.Petersburg, Tübingen, Yerevan conferences of IACM).[39] This approach has been pursued in a number of papers.[40][41][42][43][44][45][46] A book published in late 2012, The Origins of the World's Mythologies,[47] deals with the newly proposed method of historical comparative mythology at length;[48] (for scholarly criticism see[49] and for periodic updates see[50]) It has been called a magnum opus, which should be taken seriously by social anthropologists,[51] and was praised by professor of Sanskrit Frederick Smith, who wrote that

Witzel's thesis changes the outlook on all other diffusionist models [...] His interdisciplinary approach not only demonstrates that it has a promising future, but that it has arrived and that finally one can actually speak of a science of mythology.[49]

Bruce Lincoln concluded that Witzel in this publication theorizes "in terms of deep prehistory, waves of migration, patterns of diffusion, and contrasts between the styles of thought/narration he associates with two huge aggregates of the world's population [which] strikes me as ill-founded, ill-conceived, unconvincing, and deeply disturbing in its implications."[52]

Criticism of "Indigenous Aryans"

[edit]
See also: Indigenous Aryans

Witzel published [53] articles criticizing what he calls "spurious interpretations" of Vedic texts[54] and decipherments of Indus inscriptions such as that of N.S. Rajaram.[55][56][57][58]

Indus script

[edit]

Witzel has questioned the linguistic nature of the so-called Indus script (Farmer, Sproat, Witzel 2004).[59] Farmer, Sproat, and Witzel presented a number of arguments in support of their thesis that the Indus script is non-linguistic, principal among them being the extreme brevity of the inscriptions, the existence of too many rare signs increasing over the 700-year period of the Mature Harappan civilization, and the lack of random-looking sign repetition typical for representations of actual spoken language (whether syllable-based or letter-based), as seen, for example, in Egyptian cartouches.

Earlier, he had suggested that a substrate related to, but not identical with, the Austro-Asiatic Munda languages, which he, therefore, calls para-Munda, might have been the language of (part of) the Indus population.[60][61]

Asko Parpola, reviewing the Farmer, Sproat, and Witzel thesis in 2005, states that their arguments "can be easily controverted".[62] He cites the presence of a large number of rare signs in Chinese and emphasizes that there is "little reason for sign repetition in short seal texts written in an early logo-syllabic script". Revisiting the question in a 2007 lecture,[63] Parpola takes on each of the 10 main arguments of Farmer et al., presenting counterarguments. He states that "even short noun phrases and incomplete sentences qualify as full writing if the script uses the rebus principle to phonetize some of its signs". All these points are rejected in a lengthy paper by Richard Sproat, "Corpora and Statistical Analysis of Non-Linguistic Symbol Systems" (2012).[64]

Shorter papers

[edit]

Shorter papers provide analyses of important religious (2004) and literary concepts of the period,[65] and its Central Asian antecedents[66] as well as such as the oldest frame story (1986, 1987), prosimetric texts (1997), the Mahabharata (2005), the concept of rebirth (1984), the 'line of progeny' (2000), splitting one's head in discussion (1987), the holy cow (1991),[67] the Milky Way (1984),[68] the asterism of the Seven Rsis (1995,[69] 1999), the sage Yajnavalkya (2003), supposed female Rishis in the Veda (2009,)[70] the persistence of some Vedic beliefs,[71][72] in modern Hinduism (1989[73] 2002, with cultural historian Steve Farmer and John B. Henderson), as well as some modern Indocentric tendencies (2001-).[74][75]

Other work (1976-) deals with the traditions of medieval and modern India and Nepal, [76][16] [77][78] including its linguistic history,[20] Brahmins,[79][80] rituals, and kingship (1987) and present day culture,[81] as well as with Old Iran and the Avesta (1972-), including its homeland in Eastern Iran and Afghanistan (2000).[82]

Conferences

[edit]

Witzel has organized a number of international conferences at Harvard such as the first of the intermittent International Vedic Workshops (1989,1999,2004; 2011 at Bucharest, 2014 at Kozhikode, Kerala), the first of several annual International Conferences on Dowry and Bride-Burning in India (1995 sqq.), the yearly Round Tables on the Ethnogenesis of South and Central Asia (1999 sqq)[83][84] and, since 2005, conferences on comparative mythology (Kyoto, Beijing, Edinburgh, Ravenstein (Netherlands), Tokyo, Harvard, Tokyo).[85][86][87][88] [89][90] as well as at Strasbourg, St.Petersburg, Tübingen and Yerevan.

At the Beijing conference he founded the International Association for Comparative Mythology.[5]

California textbook controversy over Hindu history

[edit]
Main article: California textbook controversy over Hindu history

In 2005, Witzel engaged other academics and activist groups to oppose changes to California state school history textbooks proposed by US-based Hindu groups,[note 1] mainly "the Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh (RSS)-linked organisations"[92][93] The Vedic Foundation and Hindu Education Foundation (HEF).[94]

Witzel and his allies argued that the changes were not of a scholarly but of a religious-political nature,[92][note 2] reflecting a limited view on Hinduism which excludes non-Vaishna traditions.[note 3] Parents supportive of the changes said they wanted a "fair representation of their culture,"[95] explaining that "the current textbooks make their children ashamed."[95]

Witzel was appointed to an expert panel set up to review the changes,[95][93][58] which was opposed by the HEF and the VF, claiming "that Witzel knew little about Hinduism and ancient Indian history,"[92] and accusing him of "leftist leanings" and being biased against Hinduism, allegations he rejects.[95][97][98] While the expert panel rejected most of the changes,[96][58] the CBE nevertheless accepted most of them,[96][58] under pressure of Hindu-organisations.[96][91] After further protest by scholars of South Asia, the CBE eventually rejected most of the changes proposed by the HEF and VF.[99][100][91]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Proposed changes included:[91]
    * presenting the Indus Valley Civilisation as an Aryan or Vedic society, denying the Indo-Aryan migrations;
    * downplaying "caste and gender-hierarchies in ancient India";
    * ignoring the rich diversity of Hindu-traditions and deities, presenting Hinduism as essentially monotheistic, "emphasiz[ing] a Vedic form of Hinduism."
  2. ^ * Meenakshi Ganjoo: "[Witzel] requested the Board of Education to reject the "Hindutva recommended" changes. Witzel wrote to the CBE President, "The proposed revisions are not of a scholarly but of a religious-political nature and are primarily promoted by Hindutva supporters and non-specialist academics writing about issues far outside their area of expertise." About 50 international scholars specializing in Indian history and culture, including Indian historian Romila Thapar and D. N. Jha, endorsed the letter."[94]
  3. ^ Limited view:
    * Witzel: "The proposed edits come out of a very sectarian approach to history [...] They view all of Hinduism through one narrow lens [...] It's people on the very fringe who want to dispute these points."[95]
    * Witzel: "California has been hijacked by a saffron agenda, worse by a sectarian saffron agenda. In this case, a strident Vaishnava one that excludes Shaiva, Devi, Tantric, Lingayat and other forms of Hindu worship and Darshana... The new CA [California] history textbooks will reflect that."[92]
    In a letter to the Board of Education, Vinay Lal, a history professor at the University of California at Los Angeles, wrote: "As far as I am aware, the Hindu Education Foundation and Vedic Foundation and their supporters do not number among their ranks any academic specialists in Indian history or religion other than Professor Bajpai himself. It is a remarkable fact that, in a state which has perhaps the leading public research university system in the United States, these two foundations could not find a single professor of Indian history or religion within the UC system (with its ten campuses) to support their views. Indeed, it would be no exaggeration to say that they would be hard pressed to find a single scholar at any research university in the United States who would support their views.[96]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Michael Witzel's curriculum vitae, accessed September 13, 2007.
  2. ^ Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies homepage, accessed September 13, 2007.
  3. ^ About the Harvard Oriental Series, accessed September 13, 2007.
  4. ^ Personal web page, accessed July 30, 2015
  5. ^ a b "compmyth.org". compmyth.org. Retrieved May 16, 2012.
  6. ^ "dmg-web.de". dmg-web.de. Retrieved May 16, 2012.
  7. ^ "Professor Michael Witzel named 2013 Cabot Fellow • the Lakshmi Mittal and Family South Asia Institute". October 23, 2013. Archived from the original on October 10, 2017. Retrieved May 16, 2014.
  8. ^ Michael Witzel, On the Localisation of Vedic Texts and Schools (Materials on Vedic sakhas, 7), India and the Ancient World. History, Trade and Culture before A.D. 650. P.H.L. Eggermont Jubilee Volume, ed. by G. Pollet, Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta 25, Leuven 1987, pp. 173-213, pdf, accessed September 13, 2007.
  9. ^ Witzel, Michael (1995). "Early Sanskritization: Origins and Development of the Kuru State" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on May 10, 2006.
  10. ^ Michael Witzel, The Development of the Vedic Canon and Its Schools: The Social and Political Milieu (Materials on Vedic Sakhas, 8, in Inside the Texts, Beyond the Texts. New Approaches to the Study of the Vedas, ed. M. Witzel, Harvard Oriental Series, Opera Minora, vol. 2, Cambridge 1997, pp. 257-345, pdf, accessed September 13, 2007.
  11. ^ Michael Witzel, How To Enter the Vedic Mind? Strategies in Translating a Brahmana Text, Translating, Translations, Translators From India to the West, Harvard Oriental Series, Opera Minora, vol. 1, Cambridge: Harvard Oriental Series, 1996, pdf, accessed September 13, 2007; Steve Farmer, John B. Henderson, and Michael Witzel, Neurobiology, Layered Texts, and Correlative Cosmologies: A Cross-Cultural Framework for Premodern History, Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities 72 (2000): 48-90, pdf, accessed September 13, 2007.
  12. ^ Witzel, Michael (October 1999). "Early Sources for South Asian Substrate Languages" (PDF). Mother Tongue. 1–70 (Special Issue). people.fas.harvard.edu. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 26, 2001. Retrieved September 13, 2007.
  13. ^ Michael Witzel's list of publications, accessed September 13, 2007.
  14. ^ Katha Âranyaka. Critical edition with a translation into German and an introduction. Cambridge: Harvard Oriental Series 65. 2004 [pp. lxxix, XXVI, 220, with color facsimiles of the Kashmir bhûrja MS]
  15. ^ Rig-Veda. Das Heilige Wissen. Erster und zweiter Liederkreis. Aus dem vedischen Sanskrit übersetzt und herausgegeben von Michael Witzel und Toshifumi Goto Unter Mitarbeit von Eijiro Doyama und Mislav Jezic. Frankfurt: Verlag der Weltreligionen 2007, pp. 1-889; first complete translation of the Rgveda into a western language since Geldner's of 1929/1951). amazon.de
  16. ^ a b Moving Targets? Texts, language, archaeology, and history in the Late Vedic and early Buddhist periods. Indo-Iranian Journal 52, 2009, 287-310
  17. ^ Michael Witzel, Caraka, English summary of "Materialen zu den vedischen Schulen: I. Uber die Caraka-Schule," Studien zur Indologie und Iranistik 7 (1981): 109-132, and 8/9 (1982): 171-240, pdf, accessed September 13, 2007; Michael Witzel, The Development of the Vedic Canon and Its Schools: The Social and Political Milieu (Materials on Vedic Sakhas, 8), in Inside the Texts, Beyond the Texts. New Approaches to the Study of the Vedas, ed. M. Witzel, Harvard Oriental Studies, Opera Minora, vol. 2, Cambridge 1997, pp. 257-345, pdf, accessed September 13, 2007.
  18. ^ Michael Witzel, On the Localisation of Vedic Texts and Schools (Materials on Vedic Sakhas, 7), in India and the Ancient World. History, Trade and Culture before A.D. 650. P.H.L. Eggermont Jubilee Volume, ed. by G. Pollet, Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta 25, Leuven 1987, pp. 173-213, pdf, accessed September 13, 2007.
  19. ^ Michael Witzel, The Development of the Vedic Canon and Its Schools: The Social and Political Milieu (Materials on Vedic Sakhas, 8), in Inside the Texts, Beyond the Texts. New Approaches to the Study of the Vedas, ed. M. Witzel, Harvard Oriental Studies, Opera Minora, vol. 2, Cambridge 1997, pp. 257-345, pdf, accessed September 13, 2007.
  20. ^ a b Michael Witzel, Nepalese Hydronomy: Towards a History of Settlement in the Himalayas, in Proceedings of the Franco-German Conference at Arc-et-Senans, June 1990, Paris 1993, pp. 217-266, pdf, accessed September 21, 2007
  21. ^ Michael Witzel, Aryan and Non-Aryan Names in Vedic India. Data for the Linguistic Situation, c. 1900-500 B.C., in J. Bronkhorst and M. Deshpande, eds., Aryans and Non-Non-Aryans, Evidence, Interpretation, and Ideology, Cambridge (Harvard Oriental Series, Opera Minora 3), 1999, pp. 337-404, pdf, accessed September 21, 2007
  22. ^ Michael Witzel, Early Sources for South Asian Substrate Languages, Mother Tongue, special issue (October 1999): 1-70, pdf, accessed September 13, 2007.
  23. ^ South Asian agricultural vocabulary. In: T. Osada (ed.). Proceedings of the Pre-Symposium of RHIN and 7th ESCA Harvard-Kyoto Round Table. Published by the Research Institute for Humanity and Nature (RHIN), Kyoto, Japan 2006: 96-120
  24. ^ The linguistic history of some Indian domestic plants Journal of Biosciences Dec. 2009, 829-833 ias.ac.in uas.ac.in
  25. ^ "ejvs.laurasianacademy.com". ejvs.laurasianacademy.com. Retrieved May 16, 2012.
  26. ^ Linguistic Evidence for Cultural Exchange in Prehistoric Western Central Asia. Philadelphia: Sino-Platonic Papers 129, Dec. 2003
  27. ^ "aa.tufs.ac.jp". aa.tufs.ac.jp. January 13, 2009. Retrieved May 16, 2012.
  28. ^ "aa.tufs.ac.jp". aa.tufs.ac.jp. November 29, 2004. Retrieved May 16, 2012.
  29. ^ Michael Witzel, Kumano.kara Woruga.made ("From Kumano to the Volga"), Zinbun 36, Kyoto 1990, pp. 4-5, in Japanese, accessed September 21, 2007.
  30. ^ Comparison and Reconstruction : Language and Mythology. Mother Tongue VI 2001, 45-62 [1]
  31. ^ Vala and Iwato. The Myth of the Hidden Sun in India, Japan and beyond. EJVS 12-1, (March 1, 2005), 1-69 [2] Archived March 7, 2013, at the Wayback Machine [3]
  32. ^ Out of Africa: the Journey of the Oldest Tales of Humankind. In: Generalized Science of Humanity Series, Vol. I. Tokyo: Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa 2006: 21-65 [4]
  33. ^ Slaying the dragon across Eurasia. In: Bengtson, John D. (ed.) In Hot Pursuit of Language in Prehistory. Essays in the four fields of anthropology. In honor of Harold Crane Fleming. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin's Publishing Company 2008: 263-286
  34. ^ Chuo Ajia Shinwa to Nihon Shinwa [Central Asian Mythology and Japanese Mythology; in Japanese], Annual Report of the Institute for Japanese Culture and Classics, Kokugakuin University. Heisei 21, (Sept. 2009), 85-96
  35. ^ Releasing the Sun at Midwinter and Slaying the Dragon at Midsummer: A Laurasian Myth Complex. In: Cosmos. The Journal of the Traditional Cosmology Society, 23, 2007 [2009], 203-244
  36. ^ 3. Pan-Gaean Flood Myths: Gondwana myths – and beyond. In: New Perspectives on Myth. Proceedings of the Second Annual Conference of the International Association for Comparative Mythology, Ravenstein (The Netherlands) August 19–21, 2008, ed. W. J.M. van Binsbergen and Eric Venbrux. PIP-TraCS No. 5, Haarlem 2010: 225-242
  37. ^ . Shamanism in Northern and Southern Asia: Their distinctive methods of change of consciousness. Social Sciences Information/Information sur les sciences sociales 50 (1) March 2011 (Paris): 2011: 39-61, cf.: [5]
  38. ^ "fas.harvard.edu" (PDF). Retrieved May 16, 2012.
  39. ^ "Harvard Round Tables on the Ethnogenesis of (South and Central) Asia". People.fas.harvard.edu. Retrieved May 16, 2012.
  40. ^ Vala and Iwato. The Myth of the Hidden Sun in India, Japan and beyond EJVS 12-1, (March 1, 2005), 1-69
  41. ^ Creation myths. In: T. Osada (ed.), Proceedings of the Pre-Symposium of RHIN and 7th ESCA Harvard-Kyoto Round Table. Published by the Research Institute for Humanity and Nature (RHIN), Kyoto, Japan 2006: 284-318
  42. ^ Out of Africa: the Journey of the Oldest Tales of Humankind. In: Generalized Science of Humanity Series, Vol. I. Tokyo: Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa 2006: 21-65
  43. ^ Myths and Consequences. Review of Stefan Arvidsson, Indo-European Mythology as Ideology and Science. (Chicago University Press 2006). Science, vol. 317, September 28, 2007, 1868-1869 (Manuscript Number: 1141619). sciencemag.org
  44. ^ Michael Witzel (September 28, 2007). "sciencemag.org". Science. 317: 1868–1869. doi:10.1126/science.1141619. S2CID 161307465.
  45. ^ "iacm.bravehost.com". iacm.bravehost.com. Archived from the original on February 13, 2012. Retrieved May 16, 2012.
  46. ^ "people.fas.harvard.edu". people.fas.harvard.edu. Retrieved May 16, 2012.
  47. ^ The Origins of the World's Mythologies. Oxford University Press
  48. ^ "oup.com". oup.com. Archived from the original on April 16, 2012. Retrieved May 16, 2012.
  49. ^ a b Smith, Frederick M. (2013). "The Paleolithic Turn: Michael Witzel's Theory of Laurasian Mythology". Religious Studies Review. 39 (3): 133–142. doi:10.1111/rsr.12047.
  50. ^ "The Laurasian Academy". Archived from the original on January 23, 2021. Retrieved January 31, 2021.
  51. ^ Allen, N.J. (2014). "Comparing mythologies on a global scale: review article of E.J. Michael Witzel, The origins of the world's mythologies" (PDF). Journal of the Anthropological Society of Oxford. 6 (1): 99–103.
  52. ^ Lincoln, Bruce (2015). "Review of The Origins of the World's Mythologies". Asian Ethnology. 74 (2): 443–449. doi:10.18874/ae.74.2.11. ISSN 1882-6865. JSTOR 43799250.
  53. ^ Michael Witzel publications list Harvard University website
  54. ^ people.fas.harvard.edu, Autochthonous Aryans
  55. ^ flonnet.com Archived December 19, 2005, at the Wayback Machine, pdf flonnet.com Archived January 4, 2006, at the Wayback Machine
  56. ^ Rama's Realm: Indocentric Rewritings of Early South Asian Archaeology and History. In: Archaeological Fantasies. How Pseudoarchaeology Misrepresents the Past and Misleads the Public, ed. by G. G. Fagan.London/New York: Routledge 2006:203-232 -- Discussion by Colin Renfrew
  57. ^ Indocentrism: Autochthonous visions of ancient India. In: The Indo-Aryan controversy : evidence and inference in Indian history / edited by Edwin F. Bryant and Laurie L. Patton. London & New York : Routledge, 2005: 341-404
  58. ^ a b c d Visveswaran et al. 2009.
  59. ^ safarmer.com (PDF), sciencemag.org
  60. ^ page 9 of the pdf ccat.sas.upenn.edu
  61. ^ Autochthonous Aryans? The Evidence from Old Indian and Iranian Texts. EJVS, May 2001
  62. ^ [(Parpola, 2005, p. 37)]
  63. ^ Asko Parpola (2008). "Is the Indus script indeed not a writing system?" Archived March 27, 2009, at the Wayback Machine In: Airāvati (pp. 111-131). Chennai: Varalaaru.com
  64. ^ "Corpora and Statistical Analysis of Non-Linguistic Symbol Systems" (PDF). linguisticsociety.org. [dead link]
  65. ^ S. W. Jamison and M. Witzel, Vedic Hinduism, written in 1992/95, pdf, accessed September 13, 2007; according to his list of publications a shorter version appeared in The Study of Hinduism, ed. A. Sharma (University of South Carolina Press, 2003), pp. 65-113.
  66. ^ The Rgvedic Religious System and its Central Asian and Hindukush Antecedents In: A. Griffiths & J.E.M. Houben (eds.). The Vedas: Texts, Language and Ritual. Groningen: Forsten 2004: 581-636 forsten.nl
  67. ^ Jha, Dwijendra Narayan (2004). The Myth of the Holy Cow. Verso. ISBN 9781859844243.
  68. ^ Michael Witzel, Sur le chemin du ciel, Bulletin des Etudes indiennes 2 (1984): 213-279, pdf, accessed September 13, 2007.
  69. ^ Michael Witzel, Looking for the Heavenly Casket Archived August 13, 2007, at the Wayback Machine, Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies 1-2 (1999), accessed September 13, 2007.
  70. ^ Female Rishis and Philosophers in the Veda? Journal of South Asia Women Studies, Vol. 11 no. 1, 2009 asiatica.org Archived July 25, 2011, at the Wayback Machine
  71. ^ Michael Witzel, On Magical Thought in the Veda, inaugural lecture, Leiden, Universitaire Pers, 1979, pdf, accessed September 13, 2007.
  72. ^ Steve Farmer, John B. Henderson, and Michael Witzel, Neurobiology, Layered Texts, and Correlative Cosmologies: A Cross-Cultural Framework for Premodern History, Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities 72 (2000): 48-90, pdf, accessed September 13, 2007.
  73. ^ web.clas.ufl.edu Archived March 5, 2005, at the Wayback Machine (page not available as of September 13, 2007)
  74. ^ Michael Witzel, Autochthonous Aryans? The Evidence from Old Indian and Iranian Texts, Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies 7-3 (2001): 1-115, pdf, accessed September 13, 2007.
  75. ^ Michael Witzel, "Westward Ho! The Incredible Wanderlust of the Rigvedic Tribes Exposed by S. Talageri. A Review of: Shrikant G. Talageri, The Rgveda. A historical analysis," Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies 7-2 (2001), in three parts, part 1 Archived July 23, 2007, at the Wayback Machine, part 2 Archived July 23, 2007, at the Wayback Machine, and part 3 Archived July 23, 2007, at the Wayback Machine all accessed September 13, 2007; Aryomke (not English), accessed September 13, 2007.
  76. ^ Das Alte Indien [History of Old India]. München: C.H. Beck [C.H. Beck Wissen in der Beck'schen Reihe] 2003, revised reprint 2010
  77. ^ Brahmanical Reactions to Foreign Influences and to Social and Religious Change. In: Olivelle, P. (ed.) Between the Empires. Society in India between 300 BCE and 400 CE. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2006: 457-499
  78. ^ Michael Witzel, On the History and the Present State of Vedic Tradition in Nepal, Vasudha vol. XV, no. 12, Kathmandu 1976, pp. 17-24, 35-39, pdf, accessed September 21, 2007.
  79. ^ Witzel, Michael (April 1, 1996). "asiatica.org". asiatica.org. Archived from the original on July 25, 2011. Retrieved May 16, 2012.
  80. ^ Kashmri Brahmins. In: The Valley of Kashmir. The making and unmaking of a composite culture? Edited by Aparna Rao, with a foreword and introductory essay by T.N.Madan. New Delhi: Manohar 2008: 37-93
  81. ^ "people.fas.harvard.edu". people.fas.harvard.edu. Retrieved May 16, 2012.
  82. ^ Michael Witzel, The Home of the Aryans, Anusantatyi: Festschrift fuer Johanna Narten zum 70. Geburtstag, ed. A. Hinze and E. Tichy (Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft, Beihefte NF 19) Dettelbach: J. H. Roell 2000, 283-338, pdf, accessed September 21, 2007.
  83. ^ "people.fas.harvard.edu". people.fas.harvard.edu. Retrieved May 16, 2012.
  84. ^ "people.fas.harvard.edu". people.fas.harvard.edu. Retrieved May 16, 2012.
  85. ^ "International Conference on Comparative Mythology (Beijing 2006)" (PDF). Retrieved May 16, 2012.
  86. ^ "people.fas.harvard.edu" (PDF). Retrieved May 16, 2012.
  87. ^ iacm.bravehost.com Archived February 13, 2012, at the Wayback Machine Index page Second Annual Conference International Association for Comparative Mythology (Ravenstein, Netherlands, August 19–21, 2008)
  88. ^ "kokugakuin.ac.jp". kokugakuin.ac.jp. Retrieved May 16, 2012.
  89. ^ "Radcliffe Exploratory Seminar on Comparative Mythology". fas.harvard.edu. Archived from the original on August 6, 2011.
  90. ^ "Fourth Annual International Conference on Comparative Mythology". fas.harvard.edu. International Association for Comparative Mythology. Archived from the original on August 6, 2011.
  91. ^ a b c Visveswaran et al. 2009, p. 6.
  92. ^ a b c d Taneja 2006.
  93. ^ a b Bose 2008.
  94. ^ a b Ganjoo 2006.
  95. ^ a b c d e Ranganathan 2006.
  96. ^ a b c d Rajagopal 2006.
  97. ^ Normand 2006.
  98. ^ Kurien 2006.
  99. ^ Kurien 2006, p. 736.
  100. ^ Bose 2008, p. 27.

Sources

[edit]
[edit]
Wikiquote has quotations related to Michael Witzel.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michael_Witzel&oldid=1248308707"