| Case name
|
Citation
|
Summary
|
| Bailey v. Alabama
|
211 U.S. 452 (1911)
|
peonage laws and the Thirteenth Amendment
|
| Weems v. United States
|
217 U.S. 349 (1910)
|
cruel and unusual punishment
|
| Bailey v. Alabama
|
219 U.S. 219 (1911)
|
Advisory opinion overturned peonage laws
|
| Muskrat v. United States
|
219 U.S. 346 (1911)
|
Advisory opinion doctrine
|
| Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.
|
220 U.S. 107 (1911)
|
constitutionality of corporate income tax
|
| United States v. Grimaud
|
220 U.S. 506 (1911)
|
control of forest reserves
|
| Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States
|
221 U.S. 1 (1910)
|
dissolving interstate monopolies
|
| Dowdell v. United States
|
221 U.S. 325 (1911)
|
sometimes considered one of the Insular Cases
|
| Gompers v. Buck's Stove and Range Co.
|
221 U.S. 418 (1911)
|
contempt for violating an injunction against a worker's boycott
|
| Hoke v. United States
|
227 U.S. 308 (1913)
|
upheld the Mann Act, but held that Congress could not regulate prostitution
|
| Bauer & Cie. v. O'Donnell
|
229 U.S. 1 (1913)
|
extensions of patents by use of licenses, rights of copyright holder regarding “use” of copyrighted works
|
| Charlton v. Kelly
|
229 U.S. 447 (1913)
|
procedures to approve extradition of criminal suspect to another country
|
| Stratton's Independence, Ltd. v. Howbert
|
231 U.S. 399 (1913)
|
|
| Weeks v. United States
|
232 U.S. 383 (1914)
|
establishment of the exclusionary rule for illegally obtained evidence
|
| Ocampo v. United States
|
234 U.S. 91 (1914)
|
sometimes considered one of the Insular Cases
|
| Shreveport Rate Case
|
234 U.S. 342 (1914)
|
Commerce clause, regulation of intrastate railroad rates
|
| Coppage v. Kansas
|
236 U.S. 1 (1915)
|
Economic due process and yellow-dog contracts
|
| Burdick v. United States
|
236 U.S. 79 (1915)
|
Legal effect of a pardon
|
| Mutual Film Corporation v. Industrial Commission of Ohio
|
236 U.S. 230 (1915)
|
free speech and the censorship of motion pictures
|
| Guinn v. United States
|
238 U.S. 347 (1915)
|
constitutionality of Oklahoma's "grandfather law" used to disenfranchise African-American voters
|
| Hadacheck v. Sebastian
|
239 U.S. 394 (1915)
|
municipal regulation of land use
|
| Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Board of Equalization
|
239 U.S. 441 (1915)
|
denial of due process procedural protections for legislative and rulemaking acts, as opposed to adjudicatory proceedings
|
| Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad
|
240 U.S. 1 (1916)
|
power to tax income under the Sixteenth Amendment
|
| Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co.
|
240 U.S. 103 (1916)
|
power to tax income under the Sixteenth Amendment
|
| Georgia, Florida, & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.
|
241 U.S. 190 (1916)
|
responsibilities of parties under a bill of lading
|
| United States v. Forty Barrels and Twenty Kegs of Coca-Cola
|
241 U.S. 265 (1916)
|
case brought against Coca-Cola under the Pure Food and Drug Act
|
| United States v. Oppenheimer
|
242 U.S. 85 (1916)
|
doctrine of res judicata applies to criminal cases
|
| American Well Works Co. v. Layne & Bowler Co.
|
241 U.S. 257 (1916)
|
scope of federal question jurisdiction in patent law case
|
| Caminetti v. United States
|
242 U.S. 470 (1917)
|
Mann Act applies to consensual extramarital sex
|
| Bunting v. Oregon
|
243 U.S. 426 (1917)
|
Labor law, ten-hour workday
|
| Adams v. Tanner
|
244 U.S. 590 (1917)
|
Substantive due process, state's prohibition of employment agencies was unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment
|
| Buchanan v. Warley
|
245 U.S. 60 (1917)
|
constitutionality of local ordinance compelling racial segregation of residential housing
|
| Chicago Board of Trade v. United States
|
246 U.S. 231 (1918)
|
Rules of a commodities exchange examined under rule of reason
|
| Hammer v. Dagenhart
|
247 U.S. 251 (1918)
|
Congressional power to regulate child labor under the Commerce Clause
|
| International News Service v. Associated Press
|
248 U.S. 215 (1918)
|
property rights in news; misappropriation doctrine
|
| Schenck v. United States
|
249 U.S. 47 (1919)
|
freedom of speech, “clear and present danger”, “shouting fire in a crowded theater”
|
| Debs v. United States
|
249 U.S. 211 (1919)
|
sedition
|
| Abrams v. United States
|
250 U.S. 616 (1919)
|
validity of criminalizing criticism of the government
|
| Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States
|
251 U.S. 385 (1920)
|
Fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine in a tax evasion case
|
| Eisner v. Macomber
|
252 U.S. 189 (1920)
|
pro rata stock dividend not taxable income
|
| Missouri v. Holland
|
252 U.S. 416 (1920)
|
states’ rights
|
| United States v. Wheeler
|
254 U.S. 281 (1920)
|
Privileges and Immunities Clause and kidnapping
|
| Smith v. Kansas City Title & Trust Co.
|
255 U.S. 180 (1921)
|
federal question jurisdiction in state corporate law matter
|
| Newberry v. United States
|
256 U.S. 232 (1921)
|
Congress lacks the power to regulate primary elections
|
| Dillon v. Gloss
|
256 U.S. 368 (1921)
|
Constitutional amendment process
|
