Universal instantiation

Universal instantiation
Type	Rule of inference
Field	Predicate logic
Symbolic statement

In predicate logic, universal instantiation^[1]^[2]^[3] (UI; also called universal specification or universal elimination,^{[citation needed]} and sometimes confused with dictum de omni)^{[citation needed]} is a valid rule of inference from a truth about each member of a class of individuals to the truth about a particular individual of that class. It is generally given as a quantification rule for the universal quantifier but it can also be encoded in an axiom schema. It is one of the basic principles used in quantification theory.

Example: "All dogs are mammals. Fido is a dog. Therefore Fido is a mammal."

Formally, the rule as an axiom schema is given as

\forall x\,A\Rightarrow A\{x\mapsto t\},

for every formula A and every term t, where $A\{x\mapsto t\}$ is the result of substituting t for each free occurrence of x in A. $\,A\{x\mapsto t\}$ is an instance of $\forall x\,A.$

And as a rule of inference it is

from

\vdash \forall xA

infer

\vdash A\{x\mapsto t\}.

Irving Copi noted that universal instantiation "...follows from variants of rules for 'natural deduction', which were devised independently by Gerhard Gentzen and Stanisław Jaśkowski in 1934."^[4]

Quine

According to Willard Van Orman Quine, universal instantiation and existential generalization are two aspects of a single principle, for instead of saying that "∀x x = x" implies "Socrates = Socrates", we could as well say that the denial "Socrates ≠ Socrates" implies "∃x x ≠ x". The principle embodied in these two operations is the link between quantifications and the singular statements that are related to them as instances. Yet it is a principle only by courtesy. It holds only in the case where a term names and, furthermore, occurs referentially.^[5]

References

^ Irving M. Copi; Carl Cohen; Kenneth McMahon (Nov 2010). Introduction to Logic. Pearson Education. ISBN 978-0205820375.^{[page needed]}
^ Hurley, Patrick. A Concise Introduction to Logic. Wadsworth Pub Co, 2008.
^ Moore and Parker^{[full citation needed]}
^ Copi, Irving M. (1979). Symbolic Logic, 5th edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
^ Willard Van Orman Quine; Roger F. Gibson (2008). "V.24. Reference and Modality". Quintessence. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. OCLC 728954096. Here: p. 366.

[1] Irving M. Copi; Carl Cohen; Kenneth McMahon (Nov 2010). Introduction to Logic. Pearson Education. ISBN 978-0205820375.^{[page needed]}

[2] Hurley, Patrick. A Concise Introduction to Logic. Wadsworth Pub Co, 2008.

[3] Moore and Parker^{[full citation needed]}

[4] Copi, Irving M. (1979). Symbolic Logic, 5th edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

[5] Willard Van Orman Quine; Roger F. Gibson (2008). "V.24. Reference and Modality". Quintessence. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. OCLC 728954096. Here: p. 366.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

Quine

See also

References