Immersion (mathematics)

In mathematics, an immersion is a differentiable function between differentiable manifolds whose differential pushforward is everywhere injective.^[1] Explicitly, $f : M \to N$ is an immersion if

D_{p}f:T_{p}M\to T_{f(p)}N\,

is an injective function at every point $p$ of $M$ (where $T p X$ denotes the tangent space of a manifold $X$ at a point $p$ in $X$ and $D p f$ is the derivative (pushforward) of the map $f$ at point $p$ ). Equivalently, $f$ is an immersion if its derivative has constant rank equal to the dimension of $M$ :^[2]

\operatorname {rank} \,D_{p}f=\dim M.

The function $f$ itself need not be injective, only its derivative must be.

Vs. embedding

A related concept is that of an embedding. A smooth embedding is an injective immersion $f : M \to N$ that is also a topological embedding, so that $M$ is diffeomorphic to its image in $N$ . An immersion is precisely a local embedding – that is, for any point $x \in M$ there is a neighbourhood, $U \subseteq M$ , of $x$ such that $f : U \to N$ is an embedding, and conversely a local embedding is an immersion.^[3] For infinite dimensional manifolds, this is sometimes taken to be the definition of an immersion.^[4]

If $M$ is compact, an injective immersion is an embedding, but if $M$ is not compact then injective immersions need not be embeddings; compare to continuous bijections versus homeomorphisms.

Regular homotopy

A regular homotopy between two immersions $f$ and $g$ from a manifold $M$ to a manifold $N$ is defined to be a differentiable function $H : M \times [0,1] \to N$ such that for all $t$ in $[0, 1]$ the function $H t : M \to N$ defined by $H t (x) = H (x, t)$ for all $x \in M$ is an immersion, with $H 0 = f$ , $H 1 = g$ . A regular homotopy is thus a homotopy through immersions.

Classification

Hassler Whitney initiated the systematic study of immersions and regular homotopies in the 1940s, proving that for $2 m < n + 1$ every map $f : M m \to N n$ of an $m$ -dimensional manifold to an $n$ -dimensional manifold is homotopic to an immersion, and in fact to an embedding for $2 m < n$ ; these are the Whitney immersion theorem and Whitney embedding theorem.

Stephen Smale expressed the regular homotopy classes of immersions ⁠ $f:M^{m}\to \mathbb {R} ^{n}$ ⁠ as the homotopy groups of a certain Stiefel manifold. The sphere eversion was a particularly striking consequence.

Morris Hirsch generalized Smale's expression to a homotopy theory description of the regular homotopy classes of immersions of any $m$ -dimensional manifold $M m$ in any $n$ -dimensional manifold $N n$ .

The Hirsch-Smale classification of immersions was generalized by Mikhail Gromov.

Existence

The Möbius strip does not immerse in codimension 0 because its tangent bundle is non-trivial.

The primary obstruction to the existence of an immersion ⁠ $i:M^{m}\to \mathbb {R} ^{n}$ ⁠ is the stable normal bundle of $M$ , as detected by its characteristic classes, notably its Stiefel–Whitney classes. That is, since ⁠ $\mathbb {R} ^{n}$ ⁠ is parallelizable, the pullback of its tangent bundle to $M$ is trivial; since this pullback is the direct sum of the (intrinsically defined) tangent bundle on $M$ , $TM$ , which has dimension $m$ , and of the normal bundle $ν$ of the immersion $i$ , which has dimension $n - m$ , for there to be a codimension $k$ immersion of $M$ , there must be a vector bundle of dimension $k$ , $ξ k$ , standing in for the normal bundle $ν$ , such that ⁠ $TM\oplus \zeta ^{k}$ ⁠ is trivial. Conversely, given such a bundle, an immersion of $M$ with this normal bundle is equivalent to a codimension 0 immersion of the total space of this bundle, which is an open manifold.

The stable normal bundle is the class of normal bundles plus trivial bundles, and thus if the stable normal bundle has cohomological dimension $k$ , it cannot come from an (unstable) normal bundle of dimension less than $k$ . Thus, the cohomology dimension of the stable normal bundle, as detected by its highest non-vanishing characteristic class, is an obstruction to immersions.

Since characteristic classes multiply under direct sum of vector bundles, this obstruction can be stated intrinsically in terms of the space $M$ and its tangent bundle and cohomology algebra. This obstruction was stated (in terms of the tangent bundle, not stable normal bundle) by Whitney.

For example, the Möbius strip has non-trivial tangent bundle, so it cannot immerse in codimension 0 (in ⁠ $\mathbb {R} ^{2}$ ⁠), though it embeds in codimension 1 (in ⁠ $\mathbb {R} ^{3}$ ⁠).

William S. Massey (1960) showed that these characteristic classes (the Stiefel–Whitney classes of the stable normal bundle) vanish above degree $n - α (n)$ , where $α (n)$ is the number of "1" digits when $n$ is written in binary; this bound is sharp, as realized by real projective space. This gave evidence to the immersion conjecture, namely that every $n$ -manifold could be immersed in codimension $n - α (n)$ , i.e., in ⁠ $\mathbb {R} ^{2n-\alpha (n)}.$ ⁠ This conjecture was proven by Ralph Cohen (1985).

Codimension 0

Codimension 0 immersions are equivalently relative dimension 0 submersions, and are better thought of as submersions. A codimension 0 immersion of a closed manifold is precisely a covering map, i.e., a fiber bundle with 0-dimensional (discrete) fiber. By Ehresmann's theorem and Phillips' theorem on submersions, a proper submersion of manifolds is a fiber bundle, hence codimension/relative dimension 0 immersions/submersions behave like submersions.

Further, codimension 0 immersions do not behave like other immersions, which are largely determined by the stable normal bundle: in codimension 0 one has issues of fundamental class and cover spaces. For instance, there is no codimension 0 immersion ⁠ $\mathbb {S} ^{1}\to \mathbb {R} ^{1},$ ⁠ despite the circle being parallelizable, which can be proven because the line has no fundamental class, so one does not get the required map on top cohomology. Alternatively, this is by invariance of domain. Similarly, although ⁠ $\mathbb {S} ^{3}$ ⁠ and the 3-torus ⁠ $\mathbb {T} ^{3}$ ⁠ are both parallelizable, there is no immersion ⁠ $\mathbb {T} ^{3}\to \mathbb {S} ^{3}$ ⁠ – any such cover would have to be ramified at some points, since the sphere is simply connected.

Another way of understanding this is that a codimension $k$ immersion of a manifold corresponds to a codimension 0 immersion of a $k$ -dimensional vector bundle, which is an open manifold if the codimension is greater than 0, but to a closed manifold in codimension 0 (if the original manifold is closed).

Multiple points

A $k$ -tuple point (double, triple, etc.) of an immersion $f : M \to N$ is an unordered set ${x 1, ..., x k}$ of distinct points $x i \in M$ with the same image $f (x i) \in N$ . If $M$ is an $m$ -dimensional manifold and $N$ is an n-dimensional manifold then for an immersion $f : M \to N$ in general position the set of $k$ -tuple points is an $(n - k (n - m))$ -dimensional manifold. Every embedding is an immersion without multiple points (where $k > 1$ ). Note, however, that the converse is false: there are injective immersions that are not embeddings.

The nature of the multiple points classifies immersions; for example, immersions of a circle in the plane are classified up to regular homotopy by the number of double points.

At a key point in surgery theory it is necessary to decide if an immersion ⁠ $f:\mathbb {S} ^{m}\to N^{2m}$ ⁠ of an $m$ -sphere in a $2 m$ -dimensional manifold is regular homotopic to an embedding, in which case it can be killed by surgery. Wall associated to $f$ an invariant $μ (f)$ in a quotient of the fundamental group ring ⁠ $\mathbb {Z} [\pi _{1}(N)]$ ⁠ which counts the double points of $f$ in the universal cover of $N$ . For $m > 2$ , $f$ is regular homotopic to an embedding if and only if $μ (f) = 0$ by the Whitney trick.

One can study embeddings as "immersions without multiple points", since immersions are easier to classify. Thus, one can start from immersions and try to eliminate multiple points, seeing if one can do this without introducing other singularities – studying "multiple disjunctions". This was first done by André Haefliger, and this approach is fruitful in codimension 3 or more – from the point of view of surgery theory, this is "high (co)dimension", unlike codimension 2 which is the knotting dimension, as in knot theory. It is studied categorically via the "calculus of functors" by Thomas Goodwillie Archived 2009-11-28 at the Wayback Machine, John Klein, and Michael S. Weiss.

Examples and properties

A mathematical rose with $k$ petals is an immersion of the circle in the plane with a single $k$ -tuple point; $k$ can be any odd number, but if even must be a multiple of 4, so the figure 8, with $k = 2$ , is not a rose.
The Klein bottle, and all other non-orientable closed surfaces, can be immersed in 3-space but not embedded.
By the Whitney–Graustein theorem, the regular homotopy classes of immersions of the circle in the plane are classified by the winding number, which is also the number of double points counted algebraically (i.e. with signs).
The sphere can be turned inside out: the standard embedding ⁠ $f_{0}:\mathbb {S} ^{2}\to \mathbb {R} ^{3}$ ⁠ is related to $f_{1}=-f_{0}:\mathbb {S} ^{2}\to \mathbb {R} ^{3}$ by a regular homotopy of immersions ⁠ $f_{t}:\mathbb {S} ^{2}\to \mathbb {R} ^{3}.$ ⁠
Boy's surface is an immersion of the real projective plane in 3-space; thus also a 2-to-1 immersion of the sphere.
The Morin surface is an immersion of the sphere; both it and Boy's surface arise as midway models in sphere eversion.

Boy's surface
The Morin surface

Immersed plane curves

Immersed plane curves have a well-defined turning number, which can be defined as the total curvature divided by 2 $π$ . This is invariant under regular homotopy, by the Whitney–Graustein theorem – topologically, it is the degree of the Gauss map, or equivalently the winding number of the unit tangent (which does not vanish) about the origin. Further, this is a complete set of invariants – any two plane curves with the same turning number are regular homotopic.

Every immersed plane curve lifts to an embedded space curve via separating the intersection points, which is not true in higher dimensions. With added data (which strand is on top), immersed plane curves yield knot diagrams, which are of central interest in knot theory. While immersed plane curves, up to regular homotopy, are determined by their turning number, knots have a very rich and complex structure.

Immersed surfaces in 3-space

The study of immersed surfaces in 3-space is closely connected with the study of knotted (embedded) surfaces in 4-space, by analogy with the theory of knot diagrams (immersed plane curves (2-space) as projections of knotted curves in 3-space): given a knotted surface in 4-space, one can project it to an immersed surface in 3-space, and conversely, given an immersed surface in 3-space, one may ask if it lifts to 4-space – is it the projection of a knotted surface in 4-space? This allows one to relate questions about these objects.

A basic result, in contrast to the case of plane curves, is that not every immersed surface lifts to a knotted surface.^[5] In some cases the obstruction is 2-torsion, such as in Koschorke's example,^[6] which is an immersed surface (formed from 3 Möbius bands, with a triple point) that does not lift to a knotted surface, but it has a double cover that does lift. A detailed analysis is given in Carter & Saito (1998a), while a more recent survey is given in Carter, Kamada & Saito (2004).

Generalizations

A far-reaching generalization of immersion theory is the homotopy principle: one may consider the immersion condition (the rank of the derivative is always $k$ ) as a partial differential relation (PDR), as it can be stated in terms of the partial derivatives of the function. Then Smale–Hirsch immersion theory is the result that this reduces to homotopy theory, and the homotopy principle gives general conditions and reasons for PDRs to reduce to homotopy theory.

Notes

^ This definition is given by Bishop & Crittenden 1964, p. 185, Darling 1994, p. 53, do Carmo 1994, p. 11, Frankel 1997, p. 169, Gallot, Hulin & Lafontaine 2004, p. 12, Kobayashi & Nomizu 1963, p. 9, Kosinski 2007, p. 27, Szekeres 2004, p. 429.
^ This definition is given by Crampin & Pirani 1994, p. 243, Spivak 1999, p. 46.
^ This kind of definition, based on local diffeomorphisms, is given by Bishop & Goldberg 1968, p. 40, Lang 1999, p. 26.
^ This kind of infinite-dimensional definition is given by Lang 1999, p. 26.
^ Carter & Saito 1998; Carter, Kamada & Saito 2004, Remark 1.23, p. 17
^ Koschorke 1979

References

Adachi, Masahisa (1993), Embeddings and immersions, translated by Kiki Hudson, ISBN 978-0-8218-4612-4
Arnold, V. I.; Varchenko, A. N.; Gusein-Zade, S. M. (1985), Singularities of Differentiable Maps: Volume 1, Birkhäuser, ISBN 0-8176-3187-9
Bishop, Richard Lawrence; Crittenden, Richard J. (1964), Geometry of manifolds, New York: Academic Press, ISBN 978-0-8218-2923-3
Bishop, R. L.; Goldberg, S. I. (1968), Tensor Analysis on Manifolds (First Dover 1980 ed.), The Macmillan Company, ISBN 0-486-64039-6
Bruce, J. W.; Giblin, P. J. (1984), Curves and Singularities, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-42999-4
Carter, J. Scott; Saito, Masahico (1998a), "Surfaces in 3-space that do not lift to embeddings in 4-space", Knot theory (Warsaw, 1995), Banach Center Publ., vol. 42, Polish Acad. Sci., Warsaw, pp. 29–47, CiteSeerX 10.1.1.44.1505, MR 1634445.
Carter, J. Scott; Saito, Masahico (1998), Knotted Surfaces and Their Diagrams, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 55, p. 258, ISBN 978-0-8218-0593-0
Carter, Scott; Kamada, Seiichi; Saito, Masahico (2004), Surfaces in 4-space, Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences, vol. 142, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, doi:10.1007/978-3-662-10162-9, ISBN 3-540-21040-7, MR 2060067.
Cohen, Ralph L. (1985), "The immersion conjecture for differentiable manifolds", Annals of Mathematics, Second Series, 122 (2): 237–328, doi:10.2307/1971304, JSTOR 1971304, MR 0808220.
Crampin, Michael; Pirani, Felix Arnold Edward (1994), Applicable differential geometry, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-23190-9
Darling, Richard William Ramsay (1994), Differential forms and connections, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, Bibcode:1994dfc..book.....D, ISBN 978-0-521-46800-8.
do Carmo, Manfredo Perdigao (1994), Riemannian Geometry, ISBN 978-0-8176-3490-2
Frankel, Theodore (1997), The Geometry of Physics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-38753-1
Gallot, Sylvestre; Hulin, Dominique; Lafontaine, Jacques (2004), Riemannian Geometry (3rd ed.), Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-3-540-20493-0
Gromov, M. (1986), Partial differential relations, Springer, ISBN 3-540-12177-3
Hirsch, Morris W. (1959), "Immersions of manifolds", Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 93 (2): 242–276, doi:10.2307/1993453, JSTOR 1993453, MR 0119214.
Kobayashi, Shoshichi; Nomizu, Katsumi (1963), Foundations of Differential Geometry, Volume 1, New York: Wiley-Interscience
Koschorke, Ulrich (1979), "Multiple points of immersions, and the Kahn-Priddy theorem", Mathematische Zeitschrift, 169 (3): 223–236, doi:10.1007/BF01214837, MR 0554526, S2CID 121273182.
Kosinski, Antoni Albert (2007) [1993], Differential manifolds, Mineola, New York: Dover Publications, ISBN 978-0-486-46244-8
Lang, Serge (1999), Fundamentals of Differential Geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, New York: Springer, ISBN 978-0-387-98593-0
Massey, W. S. (1960), "On the Stiefel-Whitney classes of a manifold", American Journal of Mathematics, 82 (1): 92–102, doi:10.2307/2372878, JSTOR 2372878, MR 0111053.
Smale, Stephen (1958), "A classification of immersions of the two-sphere", Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 90 (2): 281–290, doi:10.2307/1993205, JSTOR 1993205, MR 0104227.
Smale, Stephen (1959), "The classification of immersions of spheres in Euclidean spaces", Annals of Mathematics, Second Series, 69 (2): 327–344, doi:10.2307/1970186, JSTOR 1970186, MR 0105117.
Spivak, Michael (1999) [1970], A Comprehensive introduction to differential geometry (Volume 1), Publish or Perish, ISBN 0-914098-70-5
Spring, David (2005), "The golden age of immersion theory in topology: 1959–1973: A mathematical survey from a historical perspective", Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, New Series, 42 (2): 163–180, CiteSeerX 10.1.1.363.913, doi:10.1090/S0273-0979-05-01048-7, MR 2133309, S2CID 9237068.
Szekeres, Peter (2004), A course in modern mathematical physics: groups, Hilbert space and differential geometry, Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-82960-1
Wall, C. T. C. (1999), Surgery on compact manifolds (PDF), Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 69 (Second ed.), Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, doi:10.1090/surv/069, ISBN 0-8218-0942-3, MR 1687388.

External links

Immersion at the Manifold Atlas
Immersion of a manifold at the Encyclopedia of Mathematics

[1] This definition is given by Bishop & Crittenden 1964, p. 185, Darling 1994, p. 53, do Carmo 1994, p. 11, Frankel 1997, p. 169, Gallot, Hulin & Lafontaine 2004, p. 12, Kobayashi & Nomizu 1963, p. 9, Kosinski 2007, p. 27, Szekeres 2004, p. 429.

[2] This definition is given by Crampin & Pirani 1994, p. 243, Spivak 1999, p. 46.

[3] This kind of definition, based on local diffeomorphisms, is given by Bishop & Goldberg 1968, p. 40, Lang 1999, p. 26.

[4] This kind of infinite-dimensional definition is given by Lang 1999, p. 26.

[5] Carter & Saito 1998; Carter, Kamada & Saito 2004, Remark 1.23, p. 17

[6] Koschorke 1979

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]