Bulwark-class ship of the line
.jpg) Royal Alfred in 1867
| |
| Class overview | |
|---|---|
| Operators |  Royal Navy |
| Preceded by | Duncan class |
| Built | 1859–1870 |
| In commission | 1863–1889 |
| Planned | 12 |
| Completed | 7 |
| Cancelled | 5 (including 2 "suspended" on the stocks and never finished) |
| General characteristics [1] | |
| Type | Steam two-decker 91-gun line-of-battle ship |
| Displacement | 5,950 long tons (6,045 t) |
| Tons burthen | 3715 tons BM |
| Length |
|
| Beam | 58 ft (18 m) |
| Draught | 25 ft 6 in (7.77 m) |
| Propulsion |
|
| Sail plan |
|
| Speed | 12.5–13.4 knots (23.2–24.8 km/h) under power |
| Complement | 860 |
| Armament |
|
The Bulwark class were the final class of wooden line-of-battle ships laid down for the Royal Navy. They were laid down after HMS Warrior. In March 1861 their construction was suspended, and seven were later converted to iron-clads. HMS Bulwark and HMS Robust were kept on the stocks almost complete, in case of need, until they were scrapped in 1873 and 1872.
Origins
[edit]The consensus of British naval opinion after the Crimean War favoured the large steam-powered two-decker line-of-battle ship with 101 or 91 guns. The designs for two-decker evolved. "The 101-gun type were redesigned with an extra 400 tons and engines of 800 nhp, to produce the Duncan class. The 91s were given similar engines, while their smaller increase in size was largely taken up with an additional 15 feet (4.6 m) overall for a finer length-to-beam ratio and improved lines in HMS Defiance."[2] In the 1859 programme the two types were merged to produce a 91-gun ship with the dimensions of the 101-gun type. Two ships built on this plan - the Bulwark and Robust, the latter having been commenced as a 101-gun ship - were preserved on the stocks until 1872, the remaining seven being converted into ironclads.[3] These last two-deckers were 252 feet (77 m) overall, that they all displayed all the classic symptoms of weak construction, such as leaky seams, demonstrated that wood was no longer suitable for the construction of the largest classes of warships.[4]
Britain's first sea-going iron-clad, HMS Warrior was laid down in May 1859, and a further three had been laid down by the end of 1859. Nevertheless, the Royal Navy continued to convert old sailing line-of-battle ships to steam, and to order and lay down new Bulwark-class two-deckers. The objective was to achieve parity with the combined navies of France and Russia.[5] Initially there was great uncertainty about the value of iron-clads.[6] So it was prudent to continue building unarmoured steam line-of-battle ships, which would in any case be "the common currency of sea-power for some years to come."[7]
In March 1861, work on the Bulwark class was suspended. They were retained on the stocks while the smaller HMS Defiance was launched on 27 March 1861. The larger ships were better suited for conversion into iron-clads and were held in reserve for that purpose.[7] Similarly, the sailing line-of-battle ships HMS Albion and HMS Bombay completed their conversion to steam line-of-battle ships on 21 May and 25 June 1861 respectively.
Design
[edit]The Bulwark class ships were a modification of the 101-gun Duncan-class design. They had the same dimensions, but had a new timbering plan dated 29 July 1858, which suited the smaller armament. The reduction in armament was intended to improve the efficiency of the guns.[8]
Key Dates
[edit]The following table shows key dates for the Bulwark class.[9]
| Ship | Builder | Ordered | Laid Down | Suspended | Converted to Ironclad | Launched | Completed | Broken Up |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HMS Bulwark | Chatham | 9 April 1856 | 8 Mar 1859 | 7 Mar 1861 | Mar 1873 | |||
| HMS Robust | Devonport | 1 April 1857 | 31 Oct 1859 | 22 Mar 1861 | Aug 1872 | |||
| HMS Repulse | Woolwich | 1 April 1857 | 19 Apr 1859 | 1866 | 25 Apr 1868 | 31 Jan 1870 | 1889 | |
| HMS Zealous | Pembroke | 1 April 1857 | 21 Oct 1859 | 1864 | 7 Mar 1864 | 4 Oct 1866 | 1886 | |
| HMS Royal Alfred | Portsmouth | 8 April 1859 | 1 Dec 1859 | 22 Jun 1861 | 15 Oct 1864 | 23 Mar 1867 | 1885 | |
| HMS Royal Oak | Chatham | 8 April 1859 | 1 May 1860 | 3 Jun 1861 | 10 Sep 1862 | Apr 1863 | 1885 | |
| HMS Triumph
completed as Prince Consort |
Pembroke | 8 April 1859 | 13 Aug 1860 | 6 Jun 1861 | 26 Jun 1862 | Apr 1864 | 1882 | |
| HMS Caledonia | Woolwich | 5 March 1860 | 10 Oct 1860 | 6 Jun 1861 | 24 Oct 1862 | Apr 1865 | 1886 | |
| HMS Ocean | Devonport | 5 March 1860 | 23 Aug 1860 | 3 Jun 1861 | 19 Mar 1863 | Jul 1866 | 1886 | |
| HMS Kent | Portsmouth | 5 March 1860 | 10 Oct 1860 | Laid down but never launched. Cancelled 12 December 1863. | ||||
| HMS Blake | Pembroke | 5 March 1860 | Ordered but never laid down. Cancelled 12 December 1863. | |||||
| HMS Pitt | Chatham | 5 March 1860 | Ordered but never laid down. Cancelled 12 December 1863. | |||||
Conversion to iron-clads
[edit]Bulwark and Robust were suspended on the stocks in March 1861 in an advanced state of construction. The Controller "had plans prepared for the Bulwark to be converted into a twin turret breastwork monitor but they were never used. As Edward Reed pointed out this was a wise policy as they would have been inferior to, and yet more costly than, iron-hulled ships built from scratch."[10][11] "In war time the rapidity with which these ships might be converted into iron-clads would probably outweigh these considerations".[10] Bulwark and Robust were eventually broken up in March 1873 and August 1872 respectively.[8]
The remaining seven ships of the Bulwark class were in a less complete state and were converted into 'ironclad frigates'.
Of these HMS Triumph (later renamed HMS Prince Consort), HMS Ocean, and HMS Caledonia were converted to 'broadside ironclads' with 1000 nhp engines. HMS Royal Oak had a similar conversion but with the original 800 nhp engine. The development of these four ships is discussed in the article on the Prince Consort class.
HMS Royal Alfred, HMS Zealous and HMS Repulse were later converted into 'central battery ships'.[12]
Notes
[edit]- ^ Lambert, "Battleships in Transition", p122-6.
- ^ Evidence set before the Derby Committee 1858, WWL/8.
- ^ Parkes "British Battleships".
- ^ Lambert, "Battleships in Transition", p 54-5.
- ^ Lambert, "Battleships in Transition", p 75-76.
- ^ Submission to Board of 27 July 1858, quoted in Lambert, "Warrior", p16. See also Parkes, "British Battleships", p30.
- ^ a b Lambert, "Battleships in Transition", p 76.
- ^ a b Lambert, "Battleships in Transition", p 126.
- ^ Lambert, "Battleships in Transition", p126. Conway "All the World's Fighting Ships 1860-1905".
- ^ a b Reed, "Our Ironclad Ships p 303."
- ^ Lambert, "Battleships in Transition", p 82.
- ^ Conways, p 10-13.
References
[edit]
- Ballard, Admiral G.A. The Black Battlefleet, published Nautical Publications Co. and Society for Nautical Research, 1980. ISBN 0-245-53030-4
- Baxter, James Phinney The Introduction of the Ironclad Warship, published Harvard University, 1933.
- Friedman, Norman (2018). British Battleships of the Victorian Era. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 978-1-68247-329-0.
- Lambert, Andrew Warrior, Restoring the World's First Ironclad, published Conway Maritime Press, 1987. ISBN 0-85177-411-3
- Lambert, Andrew Battleships in Transition, the Creation of the Steam Battlefleet 1815–1860, published Conway Maritime Press, 1984. ISBN 0-85177-315-X
- Parkes, Oscar (1990) [1957]. British Battleships. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 1-55750-075-4.
- Reed, Edward J Our Ironclad Ships, their Qualities, Performance and Cost, published John Murray, 1869.
- Roberts, John (1979). "Great Britain (including Empire Forces)". In Chesneau, Roger & Kolesnik, Eugene M. (eds.). Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1860–1905. New York: Mayflower Books. pp. 1–113. ISBN 0-8317-0302-4.