Gender and religion
This article needs additional citations for verification. (October 2019) |
Gender, defined as the range of characteristics pertaining to, and differentiating between, masculinity and femininity, and religion, a system of beliefs and practices followed by a community, share a multifaceted relationship that influences both individual and collective identities. The manner in which individuals express and experience their religious convictions is profoundly shaped by gender. Experts from diverse disciplines such as theology, sociology, anthropology, and gender studies have delved into the effects of gender on religious politics and societal standards. At times, the interplay between gender and religion can confine gender roles, but in other instances, it can empower and uphold them. Such insights shed light on the ways religious doctrines and rituals can simultaneously uphold specific gender expectations and offer avenues for gender expression.
Investigating the relationship between gender and religion entails evaluating sacred texts as well as religious institutions' practices.[1] This investigation is part of a greater interest in the phenomenon of religion and is strongly tied to the larger study of gender and sexuality.[2] Scholars can better comprehend the complex dynamics of gender within religious contexts by researching how societies and cultures develop gender roles and identities, as well as how gender connects with other societal and cultural categories.[3]
Sex differences in religion can be classified as either "internal" or "external". Internal religious issues are studied from the perspective of a given religion, and might include religious beliefs and practices about the roles and rights of men and women in government, education and worship; beliefs about the sex or gender of deities and religious figures; and beliefs about the origin and meaning of human gender. External religious issues can be broadly defined as an examination of a given religion from an outsider's perspective, including possible clashes between religious leaders and laity;[4] and the influence of, and differences between, religious perspectives on social issues.
Gender of deities
[edit]The earliest documented religions, and some contemporary animist religions, involve the deification of characteristics of the natural world. These spirits are typically, but not always, gendered. It has been proposed, since the 19th century, that polytheism arose out of animism, as religious epic provided personalities to autochthonous animist spirits in various parts of the world, notably in the development of ancient near eastern and Indo-European literature. Polytheistic gods are also typically gendered. The earliest evidence of monotheism is the worship of the goddess Eurynome, Aten in Egypt, the teaching of Moses in the Torah and Zoroastrianism in Persia. Aten, Yahweh and Ahura Mazda are all masculine deities, embodied only in metaphor, so masculine rather than reproductively male.[citation needed]
Hinduism
Kali, the Hindu goddess of both the life cycle and destructive war, breaks the gender role of women representing love, sex, fertility, and beauty. This Hindu deity reflects the modern view of feminism through their depiction of female strength.[5]
Christianity
In Christianity, one entity of the Trinity, the Son, is believed to have become incarnate as a human male. Christians have traditionally believed that God the Father has masculine gender rather than male sex because the Father has never been incarnated. By contrast, there is less historical consensus on the gender of the Holy Spirit.
In Christianity the gender of God is referenced several times throughout the KJV Bible. One point of reference for GOD being male is found in the Gospel of John when Jesus Christ says to Mary Magdalene, "Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father: but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God."[6]
Islam
In Islam, God is not gendered literally or metaphorically.[7] God is referred to with the masculine pronoun in Arabic [Huwa or 'He'], as there is no neuter in the Arabic language. Ascribing natural gender to God is considered heretical because God is described as incomparable to creation. The Quran says: There is nothing like Him, and He ˹alone˺ is the All-Hearing, All-Seeing.[8]
In contrast to Christian theology, Jesus is viewed as a prophet rather than a human male incarnation of God,[9] and the primary sources of Islam [the Quran and Sunnah] do not refer to God as the 'Father'.
Creation myths about human gender
[edit]In many stories, man and woman are created at the same time, with equal standing. One example is the creation story in Genesis 1: "And God created the man in his image. In the image of God he created him. Male and female he created them."[10] Some commentators interpret the parallelism to be deliberately stressing that mankind is, in some sense, a "unity in diversity" from a divine perspective (compare e pluribus unum),[11] and that women as well as men are included in God's image. The first man, Adam, has been viewed as a spiritual being or an ideal who can be distinguished as both male and female; an androgynous being with no sex.[12] Pierre Chaunu argues that Genesis' gender-inclusive conception of humanity contrasts sharply with the views of gender found in older literature from surrounding cultures, and suggests a higher status of women in western society due to Judæo-Christian influence, and based on this verse.[13] Some scholars, such as Philo, argue that the "sexes" were developed through an accidental division of the "true self" which existed prior to being assigned with gender.[12]
In other accounts, man is created first, followed by woman. This is the case in the creation account of Genesis 2, where the first woman (Eve) is created from the rib of the first man (Adam), as a companion and helper.[14] This story about Adam and Eve shows that God created two genders, a woman from a man. God also told the woman that she can only desire the man and that he shall rule over her.[15] This is the earliest idea in catholic religion that says women should only be attracted and loyal to men, therefore supporting the claim that there is only a woman for a man. These two gender creation stories imagine the ideal of the unitary self. However, the unitary self is either androgynous or physically male; both of which are masculine in configuration.[12]
In Plato's Symposium, Aristophanes provides an account to explain gender and romantic attraction.[16] There were originally three sexes: the all-male, the all-female, and the "androgynous", who was half man, half woman. As punishment for attacking the gods, each was split in half. The halves of the androgynous being became heterosexual men and women, while the halves of the all-male and all-female became gays and lesbians, respectively.[17]
Gendered clothing in religion
[edit]Among many religions, there are traditional clothing standards unique to each culture. One aspect every religion has in common is modesty among women. There can be many reasons why women specifically are taught to cover up or dress according to a standard, but most reasons are sourced through official religious publications.
God said, in the book of Deuteronomy, “A woman shall not wear a man's garment, nor shall a man put on a woman's cloak, for whoever does these things is an abomination to the Lord your God."[18] The book intends to set a specific idea of what a man and women should, and should not wear based on their gender, or they will disappoint the Lord. In religion, this is a way to clearly show a gender divide through the idea of individuals should only wear their gender specific clothing in order to meet the religions standards. Gods response to the idea of his creations cross dressing, influences the negative opinion towards transgendered individuals.[19]
Leadership roles
[edit]Some religions restrict leadership to males.[20] The ordination of women has been a controversial issue in some religions where either the rite of ordination, or the role that an ordained person fulfills, has traditionally been restricted to men because of cultural or theological prohibitions.[21][22][23]
The journey to religious leadership presents distinct challenges for women across various faith traditions. Historically, many religious institutions have been dominated by male leadership, and this has influenced the roles and opportunities available to women. For instance, women are not permitted to become priests in the Catholic Church, and in Orthodox Judaism, the role of a rabbi is traditionally reserved for men. While Islam does permit women to serve as religious leaders, they are typically not allowed to lead mixed-gender prayers. In Hinduism, some sects or regions allow women to become priests, though this remains a rarity.[citation needed]
While many significant religious organizations in the U.S. ordain women and permit them to hold leadership positions, few women have served at the highest levels. For instance, the Episcopal Church had a woman, Katharine Jefferts Schori, serving as presiding bishop from 2006 to 2015. However, many of the largest denominations in the U.S., such as the Roman Catholic Church and the Southern Baptist Convention, do not ordain women or allow them to hold top church leadership roles. Efforts have been made in recent decades to challenge these norms. For example, while roughly six-in-ten American Catholics (59%) in a 2015 Pew Research Center survey expressed support for ordaining women in their church, the official stance remains unchanged.[24]
This underrepresentation underscores the broader societal challenges women face in asserting their leadership in traditionally male-dominated spheres. As the discourse around gender equality continues to evolve, it's crucial to understand and address the systemic barriers that women encounter in religious leadership.[citation needed]
Beginning in the 19th century, some Christian denominations have ordained women.[25] Among those who do not, many believe it is forbidden by 1 Timothy 2. Some of those denominations ordain women to the diaconate, believing this is encouraged by 1 Timothy 3–4.[26]
Some Islamic communities (mainly outside the Middle East) have recently appointed women as imams, normally with ministries restricted to leading women in prayer and other charitable ministries.[27]
Indian religions
[edit]Both masculine and feminine deities feature prominently in Hinduism. The identity of the Vedic writers is not known, but the first hymn of the Rigveda is addressed to the masculine deity Agni, and the pantheon of the Vedas is dominated by masculine gods. The most prominent Avatars of Vishnu are men.[citation needed]
Mostly, the traditional religious leaders of Jainism are men. The 19th tirthankara (traditional leader) Māllīnātha in this half cycle was female.[citation needed]
Siddhartha Gautama (the Buddha) was a man, but the female Buddha Vajrayogini also plays a role in Buddhism. In some East Asian Buddhist communities, a number of women are ordained as monks as well.[28][29]
Abrahamic religions
[edit]In Abrahamic religions, Abraham himself, Moses, David and Elijah are among the most significant leaders documented according to the traditions of the Hebrew Bible. John the Baptist, Jesus and his apostles, and Saul of Tarsus again give the New Testament an impression of the founders and key figures of Christianity being male dominated. They were followed by a millennium of theologians known as the Church Fathers. Islam was founded by Muhammad, and his successor Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman ibn Affan and Ali, for Sunnis and Ali ibn Abi Talib and The Twelve Imams for those of Shia faith, were also men. On the other hand, The Virgin Mary, the mother of Jesus of Nazareth, is not associated with leadership or teaching, but is nonetheless a key figure in Catholicism. Fatimah, daughter of Muhammad, is regarded by Muslims as an exemplar for men and women.[citation needed]
The Baháʼí Faith, a fast growing religion, teaches that men and women are equal. Prominent women celebrated in Baháʼí history include Bahíyyih Khánum, who acted head of the faith for several periods during the ministries of `Abdu'l-Bahá and Shoghi Effendi, and Táhirih, who is also held by Baháʼís as a penultimate leader. Women serve in higher percentages of leadership in appointed and elected national and international institutions of the religion than in the general population.[30] However, only men are allowed to be members of the religion's highest governing body, the Universal House of Justice.[31]
Nakayama Miki was the founder of Tenrikyo, which may be the largest religion to have a woman founder.[32] Ellen G. White was instrumental to the founding of the Seventh-day Adventist Church and is officially considered a prophet by Seventh-day Adventists.[33]
Segregation
[edit]Many religions have traditionally practiced sex segregation.
In traditional Jewish synagogues, the women's section is separated from the men's section by a wall or curtain called a mechitza.[34] Men are not permitted to pray in the presence of women, to prevent distraction.[34] The mechitza shown in the picture on the right is one in a synagogue affiliated with the 'left wing' (more modern side) of Modern Orthodox Judaism, which requires the mechitza to be of the height shown in the picture. More traditional or 'right wing' Modern Orthodox Judaism, and all forms of Haredi Judaism, require the mechitza to be of a type which absolutely prevents the men from seeing the women.
Enclosed religious orders are usually segregated by gender.
Sex segregation in Islam includes guidelines on interaction between men and women. Men and women also worship in different areas in most mosques. Both men and women cover their awra when in the presence of members of the opposite sex (who are not close relations).
Roles in marriage
[edit]Nearly all religions recognize marriage, and many religions also promote views on appropriate gender roles within marriage.
Christianity
[edit]Within Christianity, the two notable views on gender roles in a marriage are complementarianism and egalitarianism. The complementarian view of marriage is widely accepted in Christianity, where the husband is viewed as the leader and the wife is viewed as the follower. Essentially, the man is given more of a headship role and the woman is viewed as a supporting partner. In Genesis 3, Adam named his wife Eve ("life") because she "was the mother of all living" (Genesis 3:20).
In mainstream Christian tradition, the relationship between a husband and wife is believed to mirror the relationship between Christ and the Church. This can be seen in Ephesians 5:25:
Husbands love their wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her.
Christian traditionalists believe that men are meant to be living martyrs for their wives, "giving himself up for her" daily and through acts of unselfish love. The women, on the other hand, are meant to be their helpers.
While complementarianism has been the norm for years, some Christians have moved toward egalitarian views. As the nature of gender roles within societies changes, religious views on gender roles in marriage change as well.
In complementarianism, the relationship between man and woman is compared to the one between Christ and the Church. In the way Christ loved and cared for the Church, a man is expected to do the same for his wife.[35] Brown says that this is what makes a marriage a holy union, rather than a simple contract between the two.
According to Paul, husbands and wives had rights that they could expect from each other.[35] After the death of their husband, women are expected to not marry again because, on the day of resurrection, no one will 'claim' her as their wife.[35]
Marriage, according to Augustine, is a second resort to not being able to remain celibate and a virgin. The role of virginity is one that heavily impacts marriage in general according to Augustine. Virginity and celibacy are extremely important ideals that Christians must carry, but they can marry if they cannot do so. Within a marriage, women were predicted to be more likely to be unfaithful. This left the task of being sure that the wife remained faithful to the husband.[36] Augustine states that although men have dominance over women, they must implement it with compassion and love.[36]
In relation to Augustine's views on marriage and virginity, some women preferred the celibate lifestyle in order to gain freedom from male control.[37] Dennis R. Macdonald estimated that groups of widows and unmarried virgins had an impact on the patriarchal society. Researchers believe that, from a sex and gender view, remaining a virgin was a form of rebellion against male domination.[37] The most direct way for men to dominate women was through marriage, and in remaining celibate, these women did not have that domination over them.[37]
Islam
[edit]In Islam, a woman's primary responsibility is usually interpreted as fulfilling her role as a wife and mother, whereas women still have the right and are free to work.[38] A man's role is to work and be able to protect and financially support his wife and family.[39]
In regards to guidelines in marriage, a man is allowed to marry a Muslim, Jewish, Sabaean, or Christian woman whereas a woman is only allowed to marry a Muslim man. Both genders cannot marry nonbelievers or polytheists.[40]
The matter of divorce is discussed in verse 2:228 of the Qu'ran. The Qu'ran instructs women to wait at least three menstrual periods, called Iddah, before committing to a second marriage. The purpose of the Iddah is to ensure that a woman's pregnancy will be linked to the correct biological father. In the case of a Talāq, which is a divorce initiated by the man, the man is supposed to announce the words "I divorce you" aloud three times, each separated by a three-month waiting period. Certain practices of the Talāq divorce allows the "I divorce you" utterance to be completed in one sitting; however, the concept of "Triple Divorce" in one sitting is considered wrong in some branches of Islam such as with the Shia Muslims. During the three-month waiting period, only the man has the right to initiate a marital reunion if both sides desire to reconcile. This yields a gender equality perspective in the sense that women have power over men in regards to finance parallel to how men have power over women in regards to obedience, both of which are only valid to a reasonable extent. While a Ṭalāq can be completed easily, a divorce that is initiated by the woman, called a Khula, is harder to obtain due to a woman's requirement to repay her dowry and give up child custody. More specifically, a woman is to give up custody of her child if the child is over the age of seven. If a woman gains custody of her child who is under the age of seven, she must still forfeit custody upon the child's seventh birthday. Although the Islamic religion requires the woman to repay her dowry, she is also entitled to receive financial support from her former husband if needed. This cycle of financial matters protects the woman's property from being taken advantage of during or after marriage.[41]
Gender and religious expressions
[edit]The manner in which individuals express and experience their religious convictions is profoundly shaped by gender. Experts from diverse disciplines such as theology, sociology, anthropology, and gender studies have delved into the effects of gender on religious politics and societal standards. At times, the interplay between gender and religion can confine gender roles, but in other instances, it can empower and uphold them. Such insights shed light on the ways religious doctrines and rituals can simultaneously uphold specific gender expectations and offer avenues for gender expression. Furthermore, gender plays a notable role in patterns of religious conversion. According to the Pew Research Center, an estimated 83.4% of women worldwide identify with a faith group, compared to 79.9% of men. While specific conversion trends, such as women's inclination towards Christianity or men's propensity for conversion in Islam, can vary, it's essential to approach these patterns with an understanding that individual choices are influenced by a myriad of personal, cultural, and societal factors.[citation needed]
Cultural effects on religious practice
[edit]Religious worship may vary by individual due to differing cultural experiences of gender.
Greco-Roman Paganism
[edit]Both men and women who practiced paganism in ancient civilizations such as Rome and Greece worshiped male and female deities, but goddesses played a much larger role in women's lives. Roman and Greek goddesses' domains often aligned with culturally specific gender expectations at the time which served to perpetrate them in many cases. One such expectation of women was to marry at a relatively young age. The quadrennial Bear Festival, known as Arkteia, was held on the outskirts of Athens in honor of Artemis and involved girls ages seven to fourteen. The girls would compete in public athletic events as Greek men sat as onlookers, observing potential wives.[42]
Demeter, the goddess of fertility, was a prominent deity due to women's ability to relate to her. The myth surrounding Demeter involves her losing her daughter, Persephone, against her will to Hades and the grief she experiences after the event.[42] Mother-daughter relationships were very important to ancient Greeks. The severance of this relationship by fathers and husbands created much strain in young women who were forced to leave their mothers, submit to their husbands, and yield to the patriarchal society.[43] Demeter was honored through female-exclusive ceremonies in various rituals due to her general disdain for the behaviors of men. Aphrodite, too, was honored by similar means.[42] To women during this time period, the thought of Aphrodite's attitude toward males was comforting as she refused to answer to any mortal man, exhibiting the control that mortal women desired to have in their own lives.[44]
Religious teachings on gender-related issues
[edit]Abortion
[edit]Women choosing to or not choosing to have an abortion is one of many gender related issues among different religions. In many religions, abortion is considered immoral.
The Catholic Church recognizes conception as the beginning of a human life, thus abortion is prohibited under all circumstances. However, according to the Second Vatican Council, women who have had an abortion but are willing to commit to the right of life are ensured forgiveness.[45]
The Catholic Church has thoroughly fought the legalization of abortion and has expressed their thoughts on the issue. They take a pure pro-life stance with the help of protests, presentations, and proposals. They still cannot take a pluralistic stance between the values of life and liberty.[46] Though through media and political delivery, theological problems in the area of one's conscience confuses the rights to religious freedom.[47] Issues of consciousness is only something an individual can possess and yet the Church feels lesser than about the people who choose abortion [47]
Regular church attendance has been shown to correlate with a higher attitude against abortion. This means that most church-goers are pro-life and believe that life begins at conception.[48]
The pastoral message also has to be observed as each member of a church can interpret a message differently. The context of the church has to be considered as well, such as being in an urban or rural environment. The religious messages and how they are exposed in different cultural contexts can determine the effect it has on its listeners. Particularly women, who are more inclined to be religious, are more passionate about the idea of not getting an abortion.[49]
In Hinduism, it is a woman's human duty to produce offspring, thus having an abortion is a violation of that duty. The Vedas, which are age-old sacred Sanskrit texts, suggests that abortion is more sinful than killing a priest or one's own parents.[50] The practice of a woman having an abortion is deemed as unacceptable in the Hindu community, both socially and morally.[51]
On the other hand, some religions recognize that abortion is acceptable only in some circumstances. Mormons believe the act of having an abortion is troublesome and destructive; however, health risks and complications, rape, and closely mating with relatives are the only situations in which abortion is not considered a sin.[52]
Homosexuality
[edit]Homosexuality is expressly forbidden in many religions, but typically in casuistic rather than apodictic laws. As such, the rationale for such proscriptions is not clearly evident, though avoidance of procreation and contribution to society via establishing families are sometimes offered as pragmatic considerations.
In general, homosexuality is perceived as sinful in conservative movements, while fully accepted in liberal movements. For example, the Southern Baptist Christian denomination and Islamic community consider homosexuality a sin, whereas the American Baptist denomination perceives homosexuality on an inclusive scale.[53]
Transgender identities
[edit]Paganism and Neo-paganism
[edit]Many Pagan religions place an emphasis on female divine energy which is manifested as The Goddess. The consensus is unclear on what is considered female and male. During PantheaCon in 2011, a group of Dianic Wiccans performing an all-female ritual turned away trans-women from joining due to their concept of women as capable of experiencing menstruation and childbirth.[54]
Other pagans, however, have embraced a multitude of gender identities by worshiping transgender, intersex, and queer gods from antiquity, such as Greek god, Hermaphroditus.[55]
Religious support for gender equality
[edit]Some religions, religious scholars and religious persons have argued that "gender inequality" exists either generally or in certain instances, and have supported a variety of remedies.
Discrimination based on gender and religion is frequently the result of laws and practices that are justified by religious beliefs.[56] Certain religions, for example, forbid women from acting as clergy. The priesthood is reserved for men in the Catholic Church2. While men and women pray separately in Islam, women frequently have restricted room in mosques.[57] Such traditions demonstrate the complicated interplay of prejudice at the intersection of gender and religion.[citation needed]
Sikhs believe in equality of men and women. Gender equality in Sikhism is exemplified by the following quote from Sikh holy scriptures: “From woman, man is born; within woman, man is conceived; to a woman he is engaged and married. Woman becomes his friend; through woman, the future generations come. When his woman dies, he seeks another woman; to woman he is bound. So why call her bad from whom kings are born. From woman, woman is born; without woman, there would be no one at all." – Translated into English from Gurmukhi, Siri Guru Nanak Sahib in Raag Aasaa, Siri Guru Granth Sahib pp 473
Pierre Chaunu has argued that the influence of Christianity promotes equality for women.[13]
Priyamvada Gopal, of Churchill College, Cambridge, argues that increased gender equality is indeed a product of Judeo-Christian doctrine, but not exclusive to it. She expresses concern that gender equality is used by western countries as a rationale for "neocolonialism".[58] Jamaine Abidogun argues that Judeo-Christian influence has indeed shaped gender roles in Nigeria (a strongly Christianised country); however, she does not consider feminism to be a product of Judeo-Christian doctrine, but rather a preferable form of "neocolonialism".[59][clarification needed]
Gender patterns in religious observance
[edit]In studies pertaining to gender patterns in religions, it has been widely accepted that females are more likely to be religious than males. In 1997, statistics gathered by Beit-Hallahmi and Argyle theorized this phenomenon into three primary causes. The first explanation is that women feel emotions at greater heights than men do, thus women tend to turn to religion more in times of high emotions such as gratitude or guilt. The second explanation is that female socialization is more likely to align with values that are commonly found in religion such as conflict mediation, tenderness, and humility. In contrast, male socialization is more likely to emphasize rebellion, thus making the guideline aspects of religion less appealing. The third explanation, which is also the most recent theory, is that females are more likely to be able to identify with religion as a natural consequence of societal structures. For example, since a majority of religions emphasize women as caretakers of the home, the societal expectation of women to take greater responsibility than men for the upbringing of a child makes religion an appealing commitment. Another example is that traditionally, men tend to work outside the home whereas women tend to work inside the home, which corresponds to studies that have shown that people are more likely to be religious when working inside of their homes.[60]
The Pew Research Center studied the effects of gender on religiosity throughout the world, finding that women are generally more religious than men, yet the gender gap is greater for Christians than Muslims.[61]
Specific religions
[edit]More information on the role of gender in specific religions can be found on the following pages:
- Baháʼí Faith – Baháʼí Faith and gender equality
- Buddhism – Women in Buddhism
- Christianity – Women in Christianity
- Hinduism – Women in Hinduism
- Islam – Women in Islam
- Judaism – Gender and Judaism, Women in Judaism
- Sikhism – Women in Sikhism
See also
[edit]- Thealogy aka Feminine divine
- Religion and sexuality
- Sex segregation
- Transgender people and religion
- Anti-gender movement
References
[edit]- ^ Simons, Walter (2022). "Amanda L. Scott: The Basque Seroras: Local Religion, Gender, and Power in Northern Iberia, 1550–1800. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press, 2020; pp. Xvi + 230". Journal of Religious History. 46 (3): 603–605. doi:10.1111/1467-9809.12887. S2CID 250251290.
- ^ Schnabel, Landon; Abdelhadi, Eman; Ally Zaslavsky, Katherine; Ho, Jacqueline S.; Torres-Beltran, Angie (2022). "Gender, Sexuality, and Religion: A Critical Integrative Review and Agenda for Future Research". Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 61 (2): 271–292. doi:10.1111/jssr.12781.
- ^ Höpflinger, Anna-Katharina; Lavanchy, Anne; Dahinden, Janine (2012). "Introduction: Linking Gender and Religion". Women's Studies. 41 (6): 615–638. doi:10.1080/00497878.2012.691401. S2CID 59135746.
- ^ Juschka, Darlene. "Gender." In ed. J. Hinnels. The Routledge Companion to the Study of Religion. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 2010:245-258.
- ^ Singh, Sanjay (6 January 2022). "The Nurturant-Warrior Archetype: a Meeting Ground Between the Metaphors of Sita and Kali in Vedic Hinduism". Human Arenas. 6 (4): 911–925. doi:10.1007/s42087-021-00258-3. S2CID 245709492.
- ^ "OFFICIAL KING JAMES BIBLE ONLINE". www.kingjamesbibleonline.org. Retrieved 2023-05-04.
- ^ "Islam, Irigaray, and the retrieval of Gender". www.masud.co.uk. Retrieved 2020-11-08.
- ^ "Surah Ash-Shuraa - 42:11". quran.com. Retrieved 2020-11-08.
- ^ Hasan, Mehdi (24 December 2009). "Jesus in Islam". The Guardian.
- ^ Genesis 1:27
- ^ See Geneva College discussion of a biblical foundation for a broader concept of multiculturalism based on this verse" "Rather, human diversification receives its first mention in Genesis 1:27, where the text announces the creation of the one human race: 'So God created the human race in his own image ... male and female he made them.' The text's singular term, 'human race' (`Adam in Hebrew), is specified as diverse in gender, male and female. Diversification immediately receives further stimulus in the Cultural Mandate of Genesis 1:28: "Be fruitful, increase in number, fill the earth and subdue it." This divine command calls explicitly for the scattering of the race—a theme that shall recur in the Genesis narratives—and thus calls implicitly for cultural diversification." Byron Curtis, "A Blueprint for Excellence Through Diversity at Geneva College Archived 2014-11-01 at the Wayback Machine", (Geneva College, 1999).
- ^ a b c Boyarin, Daniel (1998). "Gender". In Taylor, Mark C. (ed.). Critical Terms for Religious Studies. pp. 117–135. doi:10.7208/CHICAGO/9780226791739.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-226-79157-9.
- ^ a b "Pierre Chaunu also contends that the very recognition of women as full-fledged human beings depends on moral and ethical categories that derive ultimately from the Bible. He points out, for example, in his book Foi et histoire (Faith and History, 1980), that it is only in those cultures where the biblical text and Christianity have had some long term influence, that the status of women has gradually improved from that of property and progenitor to that of a full human being, equal to man. In cultures where the biblical text has not had any significant impact, women are regarded as property whose main purpose is to produce children. In such cultures, women are married as soon as they are able to procreate, they have little or no access to formal education, and they are allowed little self-determination. The main reason behind this social transformation is fundamentally linked to a statement found in Genesis 1:27: 'God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.' This text affirms the intrinsic dignity of both men and women regardless of their gender or social status. This is in stark contrast to ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia where the value of human beings was primarily determined on the basis of their social standing." Pierre Gilbert, How the Bible Shapes Our World
- ^ Genesis 2:18
- ^ "oremus Bible Browser : Genesis 3:16". bible.oremus.org. Retrieved 2023-10-08.
- ^ Richard L. Hunter, Plato's Symposium, (Oxford University Press, 2004), p. 60.
- ^ The Symposium of Plato, 189c2-193d5
- ^ "Bible Gateway passage: Deuteronomy 22 - English Standard Version". Bible Gateway. Retrieved 2023-10-09.
- ^ "Reconstructing Meaning in Deuteronomy 25:5: Gender, Society, and Transvestitism in Israel and the Ancient near East". Journal of Biblical Literature. Retrieved 2023-10-09.
- ^ "Women strive for larger roles in male-dominated religions". AP NEWS. January 14, 2019.
- ^ Blau, Eleanor (23 August 1974). "Women Priests: Episcopal Ordination Controversy". The New York Times.
- ^ "Women as Roman Catholic priests? Opinions are divided -- and fiery". Los Angeles Times. September 23, 2015.
- ^ Torjesen, Karen. "The Early Controversies Over Female Leadership". Christian History. Christianity Today.
- ^ Sandstrom, Aleksandra. "Women relatively rare in top positions of religious leadership". Pew Research Center. Retrieved 2023-10-23.
- ^ "When churches started to ordain women". www.religioustolerance.org.
- ^ Aldridge, Alan. Discourse on women in the clerical profession : the diaconate and language-games in the Church of England. OCLC 936727857.[page needed]
- ^ Calderini, Simonetta (10 July 2011). "Contextualizing Arguments about Female Ritual Leadership (Women Im?ms) in Classical Islamic Sources". Comparative Islamic Studies. 5 (1): 5–32. doi:10.1558/cis.v5i1.5.
- ^ English, Elizabeth (2002). Vajrayogini : her visualizations, rituals & forms : a study of the cult of Vajrayogini in India. Wisdom Publications. ISBN 978-0-86171-657-9. OCLC 857079446.[page needed]
- ^ Starkey, Caroline (2019). Women in British Buddhism. doi:10.4324/9781315110455. ISBN 978-1-315-11045-5. S2CID 182064223.[page needed]
- ^ "The Greatness Which Might Be Theirs: The Status of Women in the Baha'i Community". Bahá’í International Community. 8 March 2012. Retrieved 2 October 2022.
- ^ Smith, Peter (2000). "Universal House of Justice". A concise encyclopedia of the Baháʼí Faith. Oxford: Oneworld Publications. pp. 346–350. ISBN 978-1-85168-184-6.
- ^ Huang, Yueh-po (1 February 2016). "Colonial Encounter and Inculturation". Nova Religio. 19 (3): 78–103. doi:10.1525/nr.2016.19.3.78.
- ^ Waite, Dennis (August 1993). A Psychoanalytic and Archetypal Examination of Two Seminal Dreams and Visions of Ellen G. White (Thesis).
- ^ a b Aurora Mendelsohn (4 June 2012). "The Paradox of the Mechitza". Jewish Daily Forward. Retrieved 2023-07-30.
- ^ a b c Hunter, David G., ed. (2018-05-01). Marriage and Sexuality in Early Christianity. Minneapolis: Fortress Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctt1w6t9qk. ISBN 978-1-5064-4600-4.
- ^ a b Greenslade, S. L. (March 1959). "A. A. Moon: The De Natura Boni of St. Augustine. (Patristic Studies, vol. lxxxviii.) Pp. xvii + 281. Washington: Catholic University of America Press, 1955. Paper, $3. - M. A. Lesousky: The De Dono Perseverantiae of St. Augustine. (Patristic Studies, vol. xci.) Pp. xxii + 310. Washington: Catholic University of America Press, 1956. Paper, $3. - L. G. Müller: The De Haeresibus of St. Augustine. (Patristic Studies, vol. xc.) Pp. xix + 229. Washington, Catholic University of America Press, 1956. Paper, $2.50". The Classical Review. 9 (1): 82. doi:10.1017/s0009840x00169227. ISSN 0009-840X.
- ^ a b c MacDonald, Margaret Y. (1996-10-03). Early Christian Women and Pagan Opinion: The Power of the Hysterical Woman (1 ed.). Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511520549. ISBN 978-0-521-56728-2.
- ^ Ahmed, L., 1992, Women and Gender in Islam: Historical Roots of a Modern Debate, New Haven, Yale University Press.[page needed]
- ^ Hessini, L., 1994, Wearing the Hijab in Contemporary Morocco: Choice and Identity, in Göçek, F. M. & Balaghi, S., Reconstructing Gender in the Middle East: Tradition, Identity & Power, New York, Columbia University Press.[page needed]
- ^ "Center for Muslim-Jewish Engagement". Archived from the original on 2015-02-02.
- ^ Jaafar-Mohammad, Imani; Lehmann, Charlie (2011). "Women's Rights in Islam Regarding Marriage and Divorce". Journal of Law and Practice. 4 (1).
- ^ a b c Kraemer, Ross Shepard. Her Share of the Blessings : Women's Religions among Pagans, Jews, and Christians in the Greco-Roman World. Oxford University Press, 1992.[page needed]
- ^ Arthur, Marylin; D., H. (1977). "Politics and Pomegranates: An Interpretation of the Homeric Hymn to Demeter". Arethusa. 10 (1): 7–47. JSTOR 26307824.
- ^ Griffiths, Frederick T. (2013). "Home before lunch: The emancipated woman in Theocritus". In Foley, Helene P. (ed.). Reflections of Women in Antiquity. Routledge. pp. 247–273. ISBN 978-1-136-09818-5.
- ^ "Evangelium Vitae (25 March 1995) – John Paul II". Archived from the original on 2015-02-12.
- ^ Dillon, Michele (1995). "Religion and Culture in Tension: The Abortion Discourses of the U. S. Catholic Bishops and the Southern Baptist Convention". Religion and American Culture: A Journal of Interpretation. 5 (2): 159–180. ISSN 1052-1151. JSTOR 1123855.
- ^ a b Ott, Kate M. (2014). "From Politics to Theology: Responding to Roman Catholic Ecclesial Control of Reproductive Ethics". Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion. 30 (1): 138–147. doi:10.2979/jfemistudreli.30.1.138. ISSN 8755-4178. JSTOR 10.2979/jfemistudreli.30.1.138.
- ^ Barkan, Steven E. (2014). "Gender and Abortion Attitudes: Religiosity as a Suppressor Variable". The Public Opinion Quarterly. 78 (4): 940–950. ISSN 0033-362X. JSTOR 24545976.
- ^ Jelen, Ted G.; Wilcox, Clyde (2003). "Causes and Consequences of Public Attitudes toward Abortion: A Review and Research Agenda". Political Research Quarterly. 56 (4): 489–500. doi:10.2307/3219809. ISSN 1065-9129. JSTOR 3219809.
- ^ "BBC – Religions – Hinduism: Abortion".
- ^ Coward, Harold G.; Lipner, Julius; Young, Katherine K. (1989). Hindu Ethics: Purity, Abortion, and Euthanasia. SUNY Press. ISBN 978-0-88706-763-1.[page needed]
- ^ "Mormons Decry Abortion". The Washington Post. 13 October 1990. p. B07. ProQuest 307363513.
- ^ "Christian views of homosexuality – ReligionFacts".
- ^ Kraemer, Christine Hoff (August 2012). "Gender and Sexuality in Contemporary Paganism: Gender and Sexuality in Contemporary Paganism". Religion Compass. 6 (8): 390–401. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8171.2012.00367.x.
- ^ Vanda Zajko (2009). "'Listening With' Ovid: Intersexuality, Queer Theory, and the Myth of Hermaphroditus and Salmacis". Helios. 36 (2): 175–202. Bibcode:2009Helio..36..175V. doi:10.1353/hel.0.0023. S2CID 144301681.
- ^ Simons, Walter (2022). "Amanda L. Scott: The Basque Seroras: Local Religion, Gender, and Power in Northern Iberia, 1550–1800. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press, 2020; pp. Xvi + 230". Journal of Religious History. 46 (3): 603–605. doi:10.1111/1467-9809.12887. S2CID 250251290.
- ^ Höpflinger, Anna-Katharina; Lavanchy, Anne; Dahinden, Janine (2012). "Introduction: Linking Gender and Religion". Women's Studies. 41 (6): 615–638. doi:10.1080/00497878.2012.691401. S2CID 59135746.
- ^ "The insistence that equality is a western concept to be defended against the incursions of others relies on a continued deafness to resistant voices from outside Judaeo-Christian contexts. This, ironically, makes the self-proclaimed liberals who insist on this useful collaborators for authoritarian chauvinists from outside the west. For they are all in curious agreement that women's equality is a western concept and call for it, accordingly, to be either enforced (that's why we sent in the troops) or rejected (by keeping women secluded)." Priyamvada Gopal, "West has no monopoly on battle for gender equality Archived June 12, 2010, at the Wayback Machine", Kuwait Times September 30, 2007.
- ^ Abidogun, Jamaine (September 2007). "Western Education's Impact on Northern Igbo Gender Roles in Nsukka, Nigeria". Africa Today. 54 (1): 28–51. doi:10.2979/AFT.2007.54.1.28. JSTOR 27666873. S2CID 144584409. ProQuest 221148251.
These perceptions demonstrate a pattern of gender roles shaped by Western Judeo-Christian doctrine within the formal education curriculum, minimal inclusion of local history or cultural content, and loss of indigenous knowledge and practices. Gender-role change is one aspect of a general Westernizing effect of formal models of Western education on indigenous cultures.
- ^ de Vaus, David; McAllister, Ian (August 1987). "Gender Differences in Religion: A Test of the Structural Location Theory". American Sociological Review. 52 (4): 472. doi:10.2307/2095292. JSTOR 2095292.
- ^ "The Gender Gap in Religion Around the World". Pew Research Center's Religion & Public Life Project. 2016-03-22. Retrieved 2020-09-17.
External links
[edit]- Is Christianity an Inherently Feminine Religion? Brett and Kate McKay
- Women in the Bible by the Atheist Foundation of Australia Inc.