File talk:Wiki-gokkun.png
Is this picture of a woman eating an entire cup of semen necessary to understand the process of gokkun or seminophagia? I think most readers will understand when they read the words "the ingestion of semen for erotic gratification and/or nutritional value."SolidShroom (talk) 20:23, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- YES. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.193.1.2 (talk) 01:39, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
- While the image is not necessary to understand the process, it does illustrate the subject of the article Gokkun. And since it is not a copyrighted image, necessity is not a necessary condition for keeping the image. –BLACK FALCON (TALK) 22:23, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
- NECESSITY IS NOT NECESSARY. Strange, weren't some other articles (i.e. Tourette's Guy) deleted on that presumption? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.141.8.20 (talk) 18:05, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
- My comment was about criteria for keeping or deleting images that are not copyrighted, not articles. -- Black Falcon (talk) 21:03, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
- I think we should use this image on articles such as Milk, Soy milk, or Coconut milk. It shows the way in which people are supposed to drink these things. Remember that when used in the context of those pages, the white fluid in this image can represent those liquids, respectively. 178.32.95.58 (talk) 07:06, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Nope it's cum, it's always been cum and nothing but cum. The image stands. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.174.141.224 (talk) 04:46, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- I think we should use this image on articles such as Milk, Soy milk, or Coconut milk. It shows the way in which people are supposed to drink these things. Remember that when used in the context of those pages, the white fluid in this image can represent those liquids, respectively. 178.32.95.58 (talk) 07:06, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- My comment was about criteria for keeping or deleting images that are not copyrighted, not articles. -- Black Falcon (talk) 21:03, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
