File talk:Vacuumsimple.png

Inadequate popularisation

The terms are used improbably and/or incorrectly almost all the way, the illustrations at the end are confusing. I think this image shouldn’t be linked from False vacuum, it’s borderline, if not outright, pseudoscientific. 136.169.232.53 (talk) 13:44, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion also goes on in here: Talk:False_vacuum#On_File:Vacuumsimple.png MaoGo (talk) 08:41, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]