Jump to content

File:Papers and patents are using narrower portions of existing knowledge.png

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This is a file from the Wikimedia Commons
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Original file (1,632 × 1,105 pixels, file size: 306 KB, MIME type: image/png)

Summary

Description
English: "This figure shows changes in the level of diversity of existing scientific and

technological knowledge use in papers (A, B, and C) and patents (D, E, and F) based on following measures: diversity of work cited (A and D), mean number of self-citations (B and E), and mean age of cited work (C and F). The inset plots of A and D show changes in the share of citations to the top 1% most highly cited papers (A1 and D1) and in the semantic diversity of the top 1% most cited over time (A2 and D2). Values of both measures are computed within field and year, and are subsequently averaged across fields for plotting. Semantic diversity is based on paper and patent titles; values correspond to the ratio of the standard deviation to the mean pairwise cosine similarity (i.e., the coefficient of variation) among the titles of the 1% most cited papers and patents by field and year. To enable semantic comparisons, titles were vectorized using pretrained word embeddings. For papers, lines are shown for each WoS research area; for patents, lines are shown for each NBER technology category. In subsequent regression analyses using these measures, we find that using less diverse work, more of one’s own work, and older work is associated with less disruptive papers and patents

(see Methods, Extended Data Table 2)"
Date
Source https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.11184
Author Authors of the study: Michael Park, Erin Leahey, Russell Funk

Licensing

w:en:Creative Commons
attribution
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
You are free:
  • to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
  • to remix – to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
  • attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

Captions

From the study "The decline of disruptive science and technology"

Items portrayed in this file

depicts

23 July 2022

image/png

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current22:45, 22 February 2023Thumbnail for version as of 22:45, 22 February 20231,632 × 1,105 (306 KB)Prototyperspectiverotated (previous file can get deleted)
22:39, 22 February 2023Thumbnail for version as of 22:39, 22 February 20231,105 × 1,632 (347 KB)PrototyperspectiveUploaded a work by Authors of the study: Michael Park, Erin Leahey, Russell Funk from https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.11184 with UploadWizard

Metadata