File:Desecrated Monument to the Heroes of Kruty.jpeg

Source of the photograph: [1]

Description: Photo of the desecrated Monument to the Heroes of Kruty on 22.05.07 The image is used to illustrate the activities of anti-Ukrainian movements.

Photo: The copyright holder of the poster itself has not released it. Fair use is therefore claimed for the photo. The copyright holder's name is available on request.

This work is copyrighted (or assumed to be copyrighted) and unlicensed. It does not fall into one of the blanket acceptable non-free content categories listed at Wikipedia:Non-free content § Images or Wikipedia:Non-free content § Audio clips, and it is not covered by a more specific non-free content license listed at Category:Wikipedia non-free file copyright templates. However, it is believed that the use of this work: To illustrate the subject in question Where no free equivalent is available or could be created that would adequately give the same information On the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law. Any other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, may be copyright infringement. See Wikipedia:Non-free content and Wikipedia:Copyrights. Fair use //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Desecrated_Monument_to_the_Heroes_of_Kruty.jpeg true

To the uploader: Please add a detailed non-free use rationale for each article the image is used in, which must also declare compliance with the other parts of the non-free content criteria, as well as the source of the work and copyright information. For example non-free use rationales, see Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Template:Non-free use rationale may be helpful for stating the rationale. This tag is not a sufficient claim of fair use. To patrollers and administrators: If this image has an appropriate rationale please append |image has rationale=yes as a parameter to the license template.

Fair use rationale:

1. the content of the photo is only being used for informational purposes;
2. the displayed picture shows acts of vandalism; and was photographed in that context;
3. the relative size is much smaller than the original;
4. the intent in the creation of the picture was not commercial distribution, and there is no reason to believe that future commercial exploitation might occur, or be impacted by this photograph's availability if it does;
5. the image's inclusion in the article adds significantly to the article because, it shows acts of vandalism and is link to the topic under discussion, this image cannot be otherwise replicated, and no suitable replacement has been located. The photograph of the event has been reproduced and commented on by media sources and blogs, which adds to the unique nature of this particular image as an illustration of the place discussed in our article.