I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following licenses:

This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.

You are free:

• to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
• to remix – to adapt the work

Under the following conditions:

• attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
• share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0CC BY-SA 3.0 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 truetrue

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled GNU Free Documentation License.http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.htmlGFDLGNU Free Documentation Licensetruetrue

You may select the license of your choice.

The person who posted this photo of MY DOG neither took the photo nor knows anything about Pulik or my dog, who was male—not female-and eight—not two—years old at the time of this shot.

A coat of this length and mass takes years, as anyone knowing Pulik would know. And, many Pulik owners were impressed with Max’s coat, so it’s unfair to prospective owners to raise their expectations.

And, the shot was taken by an American in the US.

I have plenty to substantiate my allegations, so please correct the misinformation by someone who has no right to ID as Puli1989, nor to claim anything re a photo and dog that are not theirs. Several shots of my dogs taken by friends ended up on the internet and on videos. I’ll never let that happen again, given that someone could provide totally inaccurate info re a copied photo.