Jump to content

Bacterial wilt

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Erwinia tracheiphila)

Bacterial wilt
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Bacteria
Phylum: Pseudomonadota
Class: Gammaproteobacteria
Order: Enterobacterales
Family: Erwiniaceae
Genus: Erwinia
Species:
E. tracheiphila
Binomial name
Erwinia tracheiphila
(Smith 1895) Bergey et al. 1923

Bacterial wilt is a complex of diseases that occur in plants such as Cucurbitaceae and Solanaceae (tomato, common bean,[1][2] etc.) and are caused by the pathogens Erwinia tracheiphila, a gram-negative bacterium, or Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. flaccumfaciens, a gram-positive bacterium. Cucumber and melon plants are most susceptible, but squash, pumpkins, and gourds may also become infected.

Bacterial wilts of tomato, Capsicum (pepper), Solanum ovigerum (eggplant), and Irish potato can be caused by (Burkholderiaceae) Ralstonia solanacearum.[3] Other bacteria in the family Burkholderiaceae can cause bacterial wilt of carnation.

Bacteria in the genus Xanthomonas can cause banana bacterial wilt or bacterial wilt in the genus Agrostis.[4]

Disease transmission

[edit]

Erwinia tracheiphila is spread between plants by two species of insect vectors, striped cucumber beetles (Acalymma vittatum) and spotted cucumber beetles (Diabrotica undecimpunctata). The beetles acquire E. tracheiphila by feeding on infected plants, then carry the bacteria in their digestive tracts. The disease may be spread to susceptible plants through feeding wounds, by way of infected mouthparts or frass. The bacteria is capable of overwintering in the gut of its insect vectors.

Symptoms and diagnosis

[edit]

Bacterial wilt is a disease of the vascular tissue. When a plant is infected, E. tracheiphila multiplies within the xylem, eventually causing mechanical blockage of the water transport system. The first sign of infection, which appears about five days after acquisition, is the wilting of individual leaves on a single stem. However, the disease will soon spread down the runner and then infect the whole plant, causing it to shrivel and die. There is a diagnostic test for bacterial wilt that can be done in the field. The presence of the E. tracheiphila causes the sap to become a milky color and acquire a sticky consistency. If the stem is cut near the crown and the ends are slowly pulled apart, the sap should form a viscous string.

Treatment and prevention

[edit]

Once a plant is infected, there is no way of stopping the spread of the disease. Some cucurbit cultivars are less susceptible than others, so it is beneficial to plant these cultivars. However, since wilt-resistant plants have not yet been developed, the most effective way to prevent the disease is to keep beetle populations at a minimum. While various methods of beetle control have been tested, the most effective preventative measure is to keep beetle populations as low as possible through careful field monitoring and insecticide sprays. Cultural control can also be effective, thus this means one should apply the direct methods.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Martins, Samuel Julio; Medeiros, Flavio Henrique Vasconcelos; Souza, Ricardo Magela; Vilela, Laize Aparecida Ferreira (2014). "Is curtobacterium wilt biocontrol temperature dependent?". Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy. 36 (4): 409. doi:10.4025/actasciagron.v36i4.18018.
  2. ^ Martins, Samuel Julio; De Medeiros, Flavio Henrique Vasconcelos; De Souza, Ricardo Magela; De Resende, Mário Lúcio Vilela; Ribeiro, Pedro Martins (2013). "Biological control of bacterial wilt of common bean by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria". Biological Control. 66: 65–71. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2013.03.009.
  3. ^ Allen, Caitilyn; Prior, Philippe; Hayward, Alan Christopher, eds. (2005). Bacterial Wilt: The Disease and the Ralston solanacearum Species Complex. St. Paul: APS Press. ISBN 0-89054-329-1; 508 pages. (APS Press bestseller for 2005){{cite book}}: CS1 maint: postscript (link)
  4. ^ Sarkar, Shamayeeta; Chaudhuri, Sujata (2016). "Bacterial wilt and its management". Current Science. 110 (8): 1439–1445. JSTOR 24908099.

General references

[edit]
[edit]