Talk:Rosalind Creasy

A fact from Rosalind Creasy appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 December 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Rosalind Creasy wrote a landmark book on edible landscaping?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2022/December. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rosalind Creasy.

Wikipedia

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

United States: Massachusetts Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts (assessed as Low-importance).

Women in Red: 2022

This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project in 2022. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 22:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Rosalind Creasy wrote a landmark book on edible landscaping? Source: "Creasy’s landmark “The Complete Book of Edible Landscaping” (Sierra Club Books, 1982) presented fruits and vegetables as artful landscape design, not just human fodder." LA Times
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Dukes Meadows

Created by Thriley (talk) and DaffodilOcean (talk). Nominated by Thriley (talk) at 03:22, 26 November 2022 (UTC).[reply]

This looks fine. Article is new & long enuf, QPQ done, hook is interesting. No discernable copyvio; AGF on offline sources. Some of the references are very redundant (see "Selected publications") but I think that's outside the scope of a DYK review. Cheers, Kingoflettuce (talk) 09:39, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]