Talk:Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) thing(s).

United States: Hispanic and Latino / Mexican-Americans Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Hispanic and Latino Americans portal This article is supported by the Hispanic and Latino Americans task force.
	This article is supported by the Mexican-American task force.

Pages issues

@Bearcat: the propsed merger of content was discussed here, Talk:Congressional_Hispanic_Caucus#Proposed_merger. It was not accepted. In the last year, a number of edits have been made to clean up this work. I'm not really clear why it doesn't get approved. Thanks. --evrik ^(talk) 19:28, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't my responsibility to have known that there was a previous merger proposal in any place other than here, or even to have gone gallivanting around to see if there might be. It's your job to make sure that the distinction is clarified here, not anybody else's job to read your mind to know that there was some discussion elsewhere. My job begins and ends with looking at this page, and noticing that all you did was to resubmit this for another kick at the can without making any changes after the last time it was rejected, and it's not my responsibility to have known anything about any other discussions that didn't take place on this page. And furthermore, that merger discussion features just one other participant besides you preemptively opposing it yourself as part of the process of even initiating it, so that in no way qualifies as any sort of "consensus" that I should take seriously either. "I opposed it myself right in the nomination, and got one other person to agree with me, so BOOYA!" is not how consensus works around here. Bearcat (talk) 19:58, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bearcat, it was open for three weeks. I have reposted the request. --evrik ^(talk) 00:41, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]