Military campaigns of Temryuk Idar
Military Campaigns of Temryuk Idar | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Part of Circassian Expansion | |||||||||
Grigory Semyonovich Pleshcheev travels to Cherkasy together with Prince Temryuk, his son Domanuk and head of the archery Grigory Vrazhsky | |||||||||
| |||||||||
Belligerents | |||||||||
Kabardia Supported: Tsardom of Russia |
Crimean Khanate Nogais Ottoman Empire Kumyks Ossetians Georgia Ingush Karachay Balkars | ||||||||
Commanders and leaders | |||||||||
Temryuk Idar |
Khan Devlet I Giray Other Crimean leaders Leaders of the Nogai Horde Independent tribal leaders | ||||||||
Strength | |||||||||
10,000–15,000 warriors Support from Russian allies in logistics and intelligence | 15,000–60,000 coalition forces, including Crimean cavalry and Nogai tribes | ||||||||
Casualties and losses | |||||||||
Lower losses campaigns achieved objectives |
Heavy suffered decisive defeats in several key battles |
The Military Campaigns of Temryuk Idar were a series of conflicts in the North Caucasus during the 16th century that aimed to unify Kabarda under centralized leadership and defend against external aggressors, including the Crimean Khanate, the Nogai Horde, and independent mountain tribes. Under the leadership of Temryuk Idar, Kabarda emerged as a strong regional power, with its borders fortified and internal unity secured. The campaigns also marked a period of strategic cooperation with the Tsardom of Russia, particularly in countering the influence of the Crimean Khanate in the region.
Background
[edit]The Kabardian Principality, situated in the North Caucasus, was a vital political and military entity during the 16th century. Its location at the crossroads of major empires and tribal territories made it a key player in the geopolitics of the region. To the west, Kabarda faced pressure from the Crimean Khanate, an ally of the Ottoman Empire. To the north, the Nogai Horde frequently clashed with Kabarda over trade routes and grazing lands. To the south, the Ottoman Empire sought to extend its influence into the Caucasus, often using the Crimean Khanate as a proxy..[1]
The natural geography of Kabarda played a critical role in its defense and economic sustainability. The Caucasus Mountains provided natural fortifications, creating a barrier against invading forces. Fertile lands along the Terek River supported agriculture, while the region’s location on key trade routes allowed Kabardians to engage in commerce with neighboring peoples and empires.[2]
Kabarda’s society was organized into a system of clans, or **teips**, with power concentrated among noble families. The princes of Kabarda, known as *pshi*, played a dominant role in regional politics. Temryuk Idar emerged from this aristocratic structure as a leader who sought to consolidate Kabardian power and resist external pressures.[3]
The political landscape of the North Caucasus during Temryuk Idar’s time was highly volatile. The Crimean Khanate conducted frequent raids into Kabarda, enslaving villagers and destroying settlements. Meanwhile, the Grand Duchy of Moscow sought to counter Ottoman and Crimean influence by forming alliances with Kabardian rulers. These geopolitical dynamics set the stage for Temryuk Idar’s rise to power and his efforts to strengthen Kabarda through military campaigns and strategic alliances.[4]
History
[edit]The history of Kabarda in the 16th century was shaped by its leaders’ efforts to resist external domination and consolidate internal power. Among these leaders, Temryuk Idar stands out as a pivotal figure who redefined Kabarda’s role in the geopolitics of the North Caucasus.[5]
Temryuk Idar came to power during a period of increased external threats. The Crimean Khanate, backed by the Ottoman Empire, conducted regular raids into Kabarda, seeking to enslave its population and establish dominance in the region. These incursions devastated Kabardian villages and disrupted trade. Temryuk’s rise to leadership was driven by the urgent need for a strong, central figure to unite the region’s clans and resist these external pressures.[6]
Early Reforms
[edit]One of Temryuk Idar’s first actions as leader was to implement reforms aimed at unifying the Kabardian aristocracy. He convened assemblies of the *pshi* (princes) to establish a coordinated military strategy and resolve internal disputes. By securing the loyalty of influential clans, Temryuk created a more centralized power structure, which allowed him to respond more effectively to external threats.[7]
Alliance with Muscovy
[edit]In 1561, Temryuk Idar solidified an alliance with Ivan IV of Russia (Ivan the Terrible) through the marriage of his daughter, Maria Temryukovna, to the Tsar. This strategic alliance was a turning point in Kabarda’s history, as it provided Kabarda with military support against the Crimean Khanate and the Nogai Horde. In exchange, Kabarda served as a buffer state, protecting Russia’s southern frontier.[8]
Temryuk’s alliance with Muscovy also introduced new opportunities for trade and cultural exchange. Kabardian elites began adopting elements of Russian military technology and tactics, which enhanced their ability to defend their territory. This partnership, however, was not without challenges, as Kabarda sought to maintain its autonomy while benefiting from Russian support.[9]
Military Campaigns of Temryuk Idar
[edit]Temryuk Idar’s military leadership defined much of Kabarda’s history in the 16th century. His campaigns were primarily aimed at defending Kabarda from external threats, consolidating internal power, and expanding the principality’s influence.
Campaigns Against the Crimean Khanate
[edit]One of Temryuk’s earliest and most significant challenges was countering the Crimean Khanate, which conducted frequent raids into Kabarda. These incursions, often supported by the Ottoman Empire, aimed to capture slaves and weaken Kabardian resistance. In response, Temryuk organized a series of counteroffensives. He fortified key settlements along the Terek River and established a network of defensive outposts to protect Kabardian villages.[10]
Temryuk’s efforts culminated in a decisive battle near the Terek River, where Kabardian forces, employing guerrilla tactics and utilizing their knowledge of the terrain, successfully repelled a larger Crimean army. This victory marked a turning point, as it curtailed Crimean incursions into Kabarda for several years.[11]
Conflict with the Nogai Horde
[edit]In addition to the Crimean Khanate, the Nogai Horde posed a persistent threat to Kabarda. The Nogai often sought control over key trade routes that passed through Kabardian territory. Temryuk led multiple campaigns to secure these routes and assert Kabarda’s dominance in the region.
In one notable campaign, Temryuk launched a preemptive strike against a Nogai encampment along the Terek River. This operation disrupted the Nogai’s supply lines and forced their retreat. The success of these campaigns solidified Kabarda’s control over strategic trade networks, enhancing its economic position.[12]
Strategic Alliances
[edit]Temryuk’s military campaigns were complemented by his ability to forge strategic alliances. His relationship with Ivan IV of Russia provided Kabarda with military support and advanced weaponry, which proved critical in several confrontations. In return, Kabarda served as a bulwark against Ottoman and Crimean expansion into Russian territories.[13]
These alliances also enabled Kabarda to modernize its military forces. Temryuk introduced new tactics and fortifications influenced by Russian methods, strengthening Kabarda’s ability to withstand invasions.[14]
Expansion into the North Caucasus
[edit]The Kabardians, historically a prominent group in the North Caucasus, maintained influence over neighboring tribes and communities through a system of tribute collection. Distant tribes such as the Ingush, Karabulaks, Kists, Tagaurians, and Digorians regularly paid tribute to the Kabardian princes. Neighboring groups, including the Karachays, Chegems, Khulams, and Bezengi, were described in historical sources as being significantly dependent on the Kabardians. One documented custom illustrates this relationship: if a servant of a Kabardian prince placed a stone at the entrance of a villager's home or farmland, the owner was prohibited from using the property[15].
As part of his efforts to consolidate Kabardian power, Temryuk Idar focused on expanding his principality's influence into the northern regions of the North Caucasus. These campaigns were aimed at securing control over strategic territories, subduing rival tribes, and establishing Kabarda as the dominant regional power.
Kabardian prince Temroqwa believed that the only way for Kabardian independence was to ally with Russia. Ivan the Terrible supported Temroqwa's goal to extend his power inside Circassia and to unify the lands of Circassians under his reign. Temroqwa established a fort in Mozdok that enabled the Circassian and Russian forces to perform joint training. Ossetian and Ingushetian lands, as well as the Turkic people, became subjects of the Kabardian raising power. Temroqwa’s expansion extended towards the Georgian kingdoms in the south.[16] [17] In 1554, Devlet Giray led a new campaign against Kabarda.[17]
In 1562, Prince Temryuk Idarovich of Kabarda launched a campaign against the Ingush on the plains. He was supported by Nogai Murz troops, and Tsar Ivan IV (Ivan the Terrible), who was married to Temryuk's daughter Maria, sent 1,000 Cossacks led by Grigory Pleshcheyev. Together, they destroyed 164 settlements, as noted in Russian chronicles. Following the defeat, the Ingush retreated to the mountains, while the Kabardians occupied their land. The Kabardians left numerous low burial mounds as markers of their victory.[18]
Kabardians, once a prominent political and military power in the North Caucasus, exerted their dominance over neighboring tribes through a combination of raids and the collection of tribute. One of the key groups involved in these interactions were the Karachays, with whom several Kabardian princely families forged agreements. These pacts effectively divided the Karachay territory into administrative regions, each governed by a representative from one of the following Kabardian clans: the Krymshamkhalov, Karabashev, and Dudov families.
Under these agreements, each Kabardian princely family would appoint a representative to serve in the Karachay region for a term of three years. The appointed representatives were tasked with maintaining order, ensuring safe passage for travelers, and mediating disputes over stolen or seized property. In exchange for these services, the Karachays were required to pay an annual tribute of 1,500 sheep and 100 cattle to the three governing Kabardian families. Historical sources indicate that particularly effective representatives were sometimes awarded additional rewards. Additionally, the senior prince of Kabarda, irrespective of their clan, was entitled to an extra tribute of one sheep per household.[19]
The political and economic relationship between the Kabardians and the Karachays was characterized by the payment of annual tributes. According to historical records, the tributes included 300 sheep, wheat, and butter. In some instances, Kabardian emissaries were sent to the Karachay region to collect additional resources as needed. Some accounts from the period have described this tribute system as exploitative[20].
The migration of the Karachay people to the Baksan Gorge marks another chapter in their historical relationship with the Kabardians. According to local folklore, the Karachays, led by a leader named Karcha, left the Dzheguta Valley due to pressure from Circassian tribes and resettled in the Baksan region. Historical records suggest that this area was traditionally considered the hereditary land of Kabardian princes, and the Karachays were obliged to pay tribute upon settling there[21].
As time passed, Kabardian influence in the region grew. Kabardian feudal lords established vassals, or taubis, in the Karachay region. These vassals, often from prominent families such as the Krymshamkhalovs, Karabashevs, and Dudovs, were tasked with collecting tribute and managing local affairs on behalf of the Kabardian princes[22]
Campaigns Against Rival Tribes
[edit]Temryuk’s expansion began with a series of campaigns targeting rival tribes in the northern steppes. These tribes, including the Kumyks and certain factions of the Nogai Horde, frequently contested Kabardian control over fertile lands and trade routes. Temryuk organized coordinated military operations to subdue these groups and integrate their territories into Kabarda.[23]
One of the most notable campaigns involved the capture of a key Kumyk stronghold near the Terek River. Temryuk’s forces utilized siege tactics learned from Russian advisors, effectively neutralizing the fortified positions of his adversaries. This victory not only secured Kabardian dominance over the region but also opened new trade opportunities with neighboring states.[24]
Diplomatic Integration
[edit]In addition to military conquest, Temryuk employed diplomacy to expand Kabardian influence. He negotiated alliances with smaller tribes, offering protection and access to trade in exchange for their loyalty. This approach minimized resistance and allowed Kabarda to incorporate new territories without prolonged conflict.[25]
Temryuk’s ability to balance military and diplomatic strategies solidified Kabarda’s control over the northern Caucasus. His efforts ensured that Kabarda became a central hub for trade and cultural exchange in the region, enhancing its economic and political stature.[26]
Defense Against Ottoman Expansion
[edit]The expansionist ambitions of the Ottoman Empire in the 16th century posed a significant threat to the Kabardian Principality. The Ottomans, often using their allies in the Crimean Khanate and Nogai Horde, sought to dominate the North Caucasus to secure control over trade routes and expand their influence. Temryuk Idar emerged as a critical figure in resisting these incursions and safeguarding Kabarda’s sovereignty.
Early Skirmishes
[edit]The first major Ottoman-backed incursions into Kabarda occurred in the 1550s. Crimean Tatar forces, supported by Ottoman resources, launched raids targeting Kabardian villages. Temryuk responded by fortifying key settlements along the Terek River and organizing militias from among the local population.[27]
In one notable encounter near the Terek River, Temryuk’s forces used a combination of guerrilla tactics and conventional warfare to repel a larger Tatar army. This battle highlighted Kabarda’s ability to effectively defend itself despite limited resources.[28]
Strategic Collaboration with Muscovy
[edit]Recognizing the growing threat from the Ottomans, Temryuk strengthened his alliance with Muscovy. In 1561, his daughter Maria Temryukovna married Ivan IV of Russia (Ivan the Terrible), formalizing the partnership between Kabarda and Muscovy. This alliance brought significant military benefits, including the supply of advanced weaponry and reinforcements.[29]
Temryuk leveraged Russian support to construct new fortifications and modernize Kabarda’s military forces. With Muscovy’s assistance, he launched preemptive strikes against Ottoman-backed forces, successfully preventing further incursions into Kabardian territory.[30]
Battle of Afips River (1570)
[edit]The Battle of Afips River, fought in late July 1570, was a significant military engagement between a coalition of Circassian princes led by Kabardian ruler Kemyrgoko Idarov and the forces of the Crimean Khanate, commanded by Aldy Giray, son of Devlet I Giray. The defeat marked a pivotal point in the history of Circassia and the region.
Background The 16th century was a period of intense diplomatic and military activity for Circassia, marked by interactions with Muscovy, the Crimean Khanate, and the Ottoman Empire. Kemyrgoko Idarov's strategic alliance with Muscovy aimed to counter Crimean influence, but internal strife among Circassian princes escalated the conflict. These tensions culminated in the Battle on the Afips River during the summer of 1570.[31][32]
The Battle The Circassian coalition, consisting of Kabardians and Bzhedugs, faced a larger Crimean army. Kemyrgoko Idarov was severely wounded, and his two sons were captured. These events marked a devastating defeat for the Circassians.[33][34]
Aftermath Kemyrgoko Idarov's injury and the capture of his sons weakened Kabardian influence, forcing the abandonment of the Terek fortress, which had been established with Muscovite support. The defeat also indirectly facilitated the Crimean Khanate's devastating raid on Moscow in 1571.[35][36]
Legacy of Battle The battle highlighted the challenges of uniting the Circassian princes amidst external and internal pressures. Kemyrgoko Idarov’s ambitious political project to centralize power under Muscovy's protection ultimately failed.[37][38]
Legacy of Resistance
[edit]Temryuk’s campaigns against the Ottoman Empire solidified his reputation as a defender of Kabardian independence. His ability to repel invasions and maintain alliances ensured that Kabarda remained a significant power in the North Caucasus. While the Ottomans continued to exert pressure on the region, Temryuk’s leadership created a legacy of resilience and strategic acumen.[39]
Aftermath
[edit]The reign of Temryuk Idar marked a transformative period in the history of the Kabardian Principality. Through his military campaigns, alliances, and reforms, he secured Kabarda’s position as a regional power in the North Caucasus. His legacy influenced Kabardian politics, military strategy, and international relations for generations.
Political Stability
[edit]Temryuk’s leadership brought a level of political stability to Kabarda that had previously been elusive. By uniting the powerful *pshi* (princes) under a centralized authority, he minimized internal conflicts and ensured a unified response to external threats. His reforms strengthened the role of Kabardian nobility while also empowering local militias to defend the principality.[40]
Strengthened Relations with Muscovy
[edit]The alliance with Muscovy, formalized through the marriage of Temryuk’s daughter Maria Temryukovna to Ivan IV of Russia, had a lasting impact on Kabarda’s foreign policy. This relationship provided Kabarda with access to advanced military technology, trade opportunities, and diplomatic support. It also established Kabarda as a key ally in Russia’s southern frontier strategy.[41]
However, this alliance was not without its challenges. Kabarda’s growing reliance on Russian support created tensions, as some factions within the principality resisted what they perceived as undue influence from Muscovy. Despite these tensions, the partnership endured and continued to shape the region’s political landscape.[42]
Military Legacy
[edit]Temryuk’s military strategies left a lasting legacy for Kabarda. His emphasis on fortifications, the integration of Russian military tactics, and the use of guerrilla warfare became hallmarks of Kabardian defense strategy. These approaches not only protected Kabarda during his reign but also influenced the tactics of subsequent leaders.[43]
Cultural Impact
[edit]Temryuk’s reign also had a profound cultural impact. The alliance with Muscovy facilitated the exchange of ideas and practices, which enriched Kabardian culture. Russian influences began to appear in Kabardian military attire, architecture, and administrative practices. At the same time, Kabarda retained its unique identity, blending external influences with its traditional customs.[44]
Conclusion
[edit]The death of Temryuk Idar marked the end of an era, but his achievements continued to shape Kabarda’s trajectory. His military campaigns ensured Kabarda’s survival against formidable adversaries, while his alliances secured its place in regional politics. Temryuk’s legacy endures as a testament to his leadership and vision during one of the most challenging periods in Kabardian history.[45]
References
[edit]- ^ Бейтуганов, С. Н. (2007). Кабарда: история и фамилии. Нальчик: Эльбрус. pp. 10–15. ISBN 978-5-7680-2113-9.
- ^ Бейтуганов, С. Н. (2007). Кабарда: история и фамилии. Нальчик: Эльбрус. pp. 16–18. ISBN 978-5-7680-2113-9.
- ^ Бейтуганов, С. Н. (2007). Кабарда: история и фамилии. Нальчик: Эльбрус. pp. 19–21. ISBN 978-5-7680-2113-9.
- ^ Бейтуганов, С. Н. (2007). Кабарда: история и фамилии. Нальчик: Эльбрус. pp. 22–25. ISBN 978-5-7680-2113-9.
- ^ Бейтуганов, С. Н. (2007). Кабарда: история и фамилии. Нальчик: Эльбрус. pp. 26–30. ISBN 978-5-7680-2113-9.
- ^ Бейтуганов, С. Н. (2007). Кабарда: история и фамилии. Нальчик: Эльбрус. pp. 31–34. ISBN 978-5-7680-2113-9.
- ^ Бейтуганов, С. Н. (2007). Кабарда: история и фамилии. Нальчик: Эльбрус. pp. 35–37. ISBN 978-5-7680-2113-9.
- ^ Бейтуганов, С. Н. (2007). Кабарда: история и фамилии. Нальчик: Эльбрус. pp. 38–40. ISBN 978-5-7680-2113-9.
- ^ Бейтуганов, С. Н. (2007). Кабарда: история и фамилии. Нальчик: Эльбрус. pp. 41–44. ISBN 978-5-7680-2113-9.
- ^ Бейтуганов, С. Н. (2007). Кабарда: история и фамилии. Нальчик: Эльбрус. pp. 45–47. ISBN 978-5-7680-2113-9.
- ^ Бейтуганов, С. Н. (2007). Кабарда: история и фамилии. Нальчик: Эльбрус. pp. 48–50. ISBN 978-5-7680-2113-9.
- ^ Бейтуганов, С. Н. (2007). Кабарда: история и фамилии. Нальчик: Эльбрус. pp. 52–54. ISBN 978-5-7680-2113-9.
- ^ Бейтуганов, С. Н. (2007). Кабарда: история и фамилии. Нальчик: Эльбрус. pp. 55–57. ISBN 978-5-7680-2113-9.
- ^ Бейтуганов, С. Н. (2007). Кабарда: история и фамилии. Нальчик: Эльбрус. pp. 58–60. ISBN 978-5-7680-2113-9.
- ^ "Боевое прошлое Северного Кавказа". Кавказский вестник (3). 1900.
- ^ Khasht, Ali. Circassian Prince Temroqwa Idar.
- ^ a b Мальбахов Б. К. "Кабарда на этапах политической истории (середина XVI — первая четверть XIX века), Москва, из-во «Поматур», 2002 г. ISBN 5-86208-106-2, ст. 246
- ^ Газиков Б.Д. (2002). Взгляд в прошлое. Назрань. pp. 59–62.
- ^ Российский государственный военно-исторический архив. Ф. 13454, Оп. 8, Д. 18, Л. 5 об.: Российская Федерация.
- ^ Алиев, У. (1927). Очерки революционного движения в Карачае. Ростов-на-Дону: Крайнациздат.
- ^ Лайпанов, Х.О. (1957). К истории карачаевцев и балкарцев. Карачаево-Черкесское книжное издательство.
- ^ Тамбиев, И. (1931). Карачай прежде и теперь. Ростов-на-Дону: Изд-во Северный Кавказ.
- ^ Бейтуганов, С. Н. (2007). Кабарда: история и фамилии. Нальчик: Эльбрус. pp. 61–63. ISBN 978-5-7680-2113-9.
- ^ Бейтуганов, С. Н. (2007). Кабарда: история и фамилии. Нальчик: Эльбрус. pp. 64–66. ISBN 978-5-7680-2113-9.
- ^ Бейтуганов, С. Н. (2007). Кабарда: история и фамилии. Нальчик: Эльбрус. pp. 67–69. ISBN 978-5-7680-2113-9.
- ^ Бейтуганов, С. Н. (2007). Кабарда: история и фамилии. Нальчик: Эльбрус. pp. 70–72. ISBN 978-5-7680-2113-9.
- ^ Бейтуганов, С. Н. (2007). Кабарда: история и фамилии. Нальчик: Эльбрус. pp. 73–75. ISBN 978-5-7680-2113-9.
- ^ Бейтуганов, С. Н. (2007). Кабарда: история и фамилии. Нальчик: Эльбрус. pp. 76–78. ISBN 978-5-7680-2113-9.
- ^ Бейтуганов, С. Н. (2007). Кабарда: история и фамилии. Нальчик: Эльбрус. pp. 79–81. ISBN 978-5-7680-2113-9.
- ^ Бейтуганов, С. Н. (2007). Кабарда: история и фамилии. Нальчик: Эльбрус. pp. 82–84. ISBN 978-5-7680-2113-9.
- ^ Кабардино-русские отношения в XVI-XVIII вв. Vol. 1. Наука. 1957. pp. 26–29, 30–33.
- ^ Ногмов, Ш.Б. (1994). История адыхейского народа. Эльбрус. pp. 123–124.
- ^ История Кабардино-Балкарской АССР с древнейших времен до наших дней. Vol. 1. Наука. 1967. p. 155.
- ^ Кожев, З.А. (2015). "Политический проект Кемиргоко Идарова". Социально-политическое и культурное пространство Центрального и Северо-Западного Кавказа: 140–153.
- ^ История народов Северного Кавказа с древнейших времен до конца XVIII в. Наука. 1988. pp. 318–319.
- ^ Штаден, Генрих (1925). О Москве Ивана Грозного. Наука. p. 107.
- ^ Кожев, З.А. (2006). Адыгская (черкесская) энциклопедия. Наука. pp. 184–185.
- ^ Известия КБН. 2015, 142
- ^ Бейтуганов, С. Н. (2007). Кабарда: история и фамилии. Нальчик: Эльбрус. pp. 85–87. ISBN 978-5-7680-2113-9.
- ^ Бейтуганов, С. Н. (2007). Кабарда: история и фамилии. Нальчик: Эльбрус. pp. 88–90. ISBN 978-5-7680-2113-9.
- ^ Бейтуганов, С. Н. (2007). Кабарда: история и фамилии. Нальчик: Эльбрус. pp. 91–93. ISBN 978-5-7680-2113-9.
- ^ Бейтуганов, С. Н. (2007). Кабарда: история и фамилии. Нальчик: Эльбрус. pp. 94–96. ISBN 978-5-7680-2113-9.
- ^ Бейтуганов, С. Н. (2007). Кабарда: история и фамилии. Нальчик: Эльбрус. pp. 97–99. ISBN 978-5-7680-2113-9.
- ^ Бейтуганов, С. Н. (2007). Кабарда: история и фамилии. Нальчик: Эльбрус. pp. 100–102. ISBN 978-5-7680-2113-9.
- ^ Бейтуганов, С. Н. (2007). Кабарда: история и фамилии. Нальчик: Эльбрус. pp. 103–105. ISBN 978-5-7680-2113-9.
- 16th-century conflicts
- 17th-century conflicts
- 18th-century conflicts
- Wars involving the Circassians
- History of the Kumyk people
- History of Dagestan
- History of the North Caucasus
- History of the Caucasus under the Russian Empire
- Invasions by Russia
- Kingdom of Kartli-Kakheti
- 19th century in the Russian Empire
- Territorial evolution of Russia
- Violence against indigenous peoples
- Russo-Persian Wars
- Caucasus Viceroyalty (1801–1917)
- History of European colonialism
- Wars involving the Tsardom of Russia
- Wars involving the Russian Empire
- Military history of Russia
- Battles involving the Karachay-Balkars
- Conflicts in 1550
- Conflicts in 1551
- Conflicts in 1552
- Conflicts in 1553
- Conflicts in 1554
- Conflicts in 1555
- Conflicts in 1556
- Conflicts in 1557
- Conflicts in 1558
- Conflicts in 1559
- Conflicts in 1560
- Conflicts in 1561
- Conflicts in 1562
- Conflicts in 1563
- Conflicts in 1564
- Conflicts in 1565
- Conflicts in 1566
- Conflicts in 1567
- Conflicts in 1568
- Conflicts in 1569
- Conflicts in 1570
- Conflicts in 1571
- 16th century in the Crimean Khanate
- Military operations involving the Crimean Khanate
- Wars involving the Ottoman Empire