Draft:Luiz Sayão

Draft article not currently submitted for review.

This is a draft Articles for creation (AfC) submission. It is not currently pending review. While there are no deadlines, abandoned drafts may be deleted after six months. To edit the draft click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.

To be accepted, a draft should:

Show the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article by using multiple sources that meet four criteria. The sources should be (1) reliable (2) secondary (3) independent of the subject (4) talk about the subject in some depth. For some topics, there are alternative criteria.
Be written from a neutral point of view
Respect copyright and do not plagiarize. Do not copy-paste.

It is strongly discouraged to write about yourself, your business or employer. If you do so, you must declare it.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Last edited by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) 4 months ago. (Update)

Submit the draft for review!

Speaking in tongues and other miraculous signs and wonders dissolved from about 54 A.D. to 95 A.D. and have not been genuine since, have not had power since (~63-73A.D.). Other gifts of Paul and Peter, still are part of the Spirit’s indwelling. We live Pentecostals and Charismatics and do that loving, partly by correcting. Otherwise, they will keep hurting their eternal reward(s). We Christians live by faith and not sight, 2Cor5:7. Ps and Cs live by sight and practice their false Christianity with arms raise straight up to praise, and wrists upturned - to “receive” - they would say. This violates John 6:63 (flesh doesn’t help at all) and Heb 8:14 OldTst obsolete. Arms pointed up and wrists upturned wouldn’t violate so much, if Ps and Cs had not infiltrated weak-leadership meetings and Have TAUGHT THAT ARM HIGH/WRISTS UPTURNED IS THE RIGHT WAY, THE BETTER WAY, THE ONLY GOD-PLEASING WAY. This teaching, infiltrating is abhorrent! John 2;21-25 apostles knew that Jesus was beginning to teach that Christ’s Word, (Ro 10:17) not his miraculous signs and wonders was the now (about 54A.D. or 95 A.D.) to the future (96 A.D. all the way to the 2nd Coming) … TRUST of all Christians everywhere. Woman at well, Jn 4 —- her testimony and Christ’s Word/words, not miracles…. JOHN CHOSE THE WORD ‘word/testimony’ - ON PURPOSE! The official plus son also John 4, … “word.” John 6 —- the people were crazed with the thought of miraculous and wonderful…, … so much so, that their craziness was in the form of seeking to make Christ King BY FORCE! This is what miracles can do and do do: cause disobedience! Onward, the Lazarus narrative: “I am glad I was not there that you may believe.” His closest followers and all who would and will ever believe would rather live Jesus’s miracles than love Him. His Providence is what God wants us to love Him for and trust Him for, … trust what He says. He loathes us when we seek, grovel after, trust in signs and wonders. Jn 12:37 is self-explanatory; in chap 15, John points out that the Jewish craziness for miracles was actually hatred toward God! Finally, John 20:22-21:2 teach that Thomas was slighted by Jesus, given the ‘cold-shoulder’ - for his living BY SIGHT. 21:2 - Thomas being second in the list is/was proven to have repented. His respect by Jesus and the apostles, had risen DUE TO HIS REPENTANCE. NATHANAEL (Bar-tholomew was surname) TOO, B/C he wanted to be deceitful and manipulative, particularly in sales techniques, but he continued to be without all that guile, even if his fleshly self was tempted toward. Well then, 1 Cor 12:1 teaches that ‘tongues’ at Corinth was Pagan-Gentile born and not part of apostolic succession. The apostles did not endorse tongues and miraculous signs/healings… after about 63 A.D. on to the end of time as humans now know it. P and C tongues is modeled after Corinth lack-of-power-tongues. And I believe that I have been filled with the Spirit the whole time I’ve been writing you this. I listen to and for the voice of the Spirit, gracious and truthful as it is, each waking moment of my life. Well, I worshipfully try to anyway, for evangelism, spouse love, child-rearing and all else. So I lead by His lead; follow by Him as well. John 16. Christ’s Holy Spirit discloses/declares to me/us all the moments of the day (see that John 16 part where it has “disclosed/declares” three times in a row. Bye, Au revoir, Visontlatashra… Chris Peck, husband of Sharon; father of Grayson (21yr man now)