Jump to content

Gajpati Ujjainia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Draft:Gajpati Ujjainia)

Gajpati Ujjainia
Raja of Bhojpur
Born1484
Bhojpur, present-day Bhojpur district, India
Died1577
Bhojpur, present-day Bhojpur district, India
DynastyUjjainiya

Raja Gajpati Ujjainia (Hindi: राजा गजपति उज्जैनिया), also known as Raja Gajpati Sahi was a ruler of Bhojpur belonging to the Ujjainiya dynasty. [1][2]

He accepted the suzerainty of Sher Shah Suri and thus also served as a commander in the army of Sher Shah Suri, the ruler of the Sur Empire. Two of his most important military campaigns he fought was the Battle of Surajgarha and Battle of Chausa. As a reward, he was given the territory of Rohtas to his dominion. He was the first Ujjainiya chief to have a continued battle with Mughals.[1][2]

Early life

[edit]

Gajpati was the son of the Ujjainiya ruler, Raja Badal Singh and the nephew of Raja Dalpat Sahi.[2][3] Following a war of succession, Gajpati, his mother and his brother, Bairi Sal were banished and Shivram Singh became the ruler of Bhojpur. In 1532, his mother requested Sher Shah Suri to help her sons get back the throne of Bhojpur. With the support of Sher Shah Suri, Gajpati defeated and killed Shivram Singh and ascended the throne of Bhojpur in 1534.[4][1]

Battle of Surajgarha

[edit]

The Ujjainiyas under the leadership of Raja Gajpati helped Sher Shah Suri in the battle of Surajgarha against the Bengal sultanate who at the time were a major regional power. Raja Gajpati handpicked 2000 of his best men and was able to help Sher Shah Suri in achieving victory. General Ibrahim Khan was killed by Raja Gajpati and all the camp equipment, elephants and artillery pieces of the Bengal army fell into the hands of Ujjainiyas. In return for their help, the Ujjainiyas were entitled to any of the spoils of war that they looted from the defeated army. Sher Shah also assigned Rohtas and Buxar to him as a reward and gifted a sword to his brother, Bairi Sal.[4][5]

Aftermath

[edit]

Following the battle, Gajpati was embroiled in another familial feud with Birbhan of Arail who requested Emperor Humayun in gaining the throne of Bhojpur in 1538.[4] Humayun provided him with some retainers and they succeeded in driving Gajpati out of his stronghold. Birbhan also supported Humayun in his clashes with Sher Shah Suri as a result of this. Gajpati in turn, after being dispossessed from his dominion, joined Sher Shah Suri and possibly took a leading role in the Battle of Chausa. He then managed to recapture his dominion and made Jagdishpur his capital and constructed a fortress there. After the defeat of Humayun, Gajpati extended his boundaries till Jaunpur, becoming the most powerful ruler of the North-western Bihar. However, he remained under the suzerainty of Sur Empire.[4]

Later in his life, he eventually did alliance with the Mughals in their offensive against Afghans in Bihar but oftentimes kept raising the standard of rebellion.[1]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d Ahmad, Imtiaz (2008). "State Formation and Consolidation under the Ujjainiya Rajputs in Medieval Bihar: Testimony of Oral Traditions as Recorded in the Tawarikh-i-Ujjainiya". In Singh, Surinder; Gaur, I. D. (eds.). Popular Literature And Pre-Modern Societies In South Asia. Pearson Education India. pp. 80–81. ISBN 978-81-317-1358-7. Retrieved 2 January 2012.
  2. ^ a b c Ansari, Tahir Hussain (2014). "A Political Biography of an Ujjainia Chief of Bhojpur: Raja Gajpati". Karatoya. 7: 40–48.
  3. ^ Garg, Sanjay (2018). Studies in Indo-Muslim History by S.H. Hodivala Volume II: A Critical Commentary on Elliot and Dowson's History of India as Told by Its Own Historians (Vols. V-VIII) & Yule and Burnell's Hobson-Jobson. Routledge. p. 827. ISBN 9780429757778.
  4. ^ a b c d Tahir Hussain Ansari (20 June 2019). Mughal Administration and the Zamindars of Bihar. Routledge. pp. 61–62. ISBN 978-1-00-065152-2.
  5. ^ Muhammad Iftekhar Alam (1991). "The Role of Ujjainia Chiefs of Bhojpur in the Battle of Surajgarha (1530 A.D.): Summary". Proceedings of the Indian History Congress. 52: 122–127. JSTOR 44142625.