Comparison of civic technology platforms
Appearance
(Redirected from Comparison Chart of Civic Technology Platforms)
Civic technology is technology that enables engagement and participation, or enhances the relationship between the people and government, by enhancing citizen communications and public decision, improving government delivery of services and infrastructure. This comparison of civic technology platforms compares platforms that are designed to improve citizen participation in governance, distinguished from technology that directly deals with government infrastructure.
Platform types
[edit]Graham Smith of the University of Southampton, in his 2005 book Beyond the Ballot, used the following categorization of democratic innovations:[1]
- Electoral innovations – "aim to increase electoral turnout"
- Consultation innovations – "aim to inform decision-makers of citizens' views"
- Deliberative innovations – "aim to bring citizens together to deliberate on policy issues, the outcomes of which may influence decision-makers"
- Co-governance innovations – "aim to give citizens significant influence during the process of decision-making"
- Direct democracy innovations – "aim to give citizens final decision-making power on key issues"
- E-democracy innovations – "use information technology to engage citizens in the decision-making process"
Comparison chart
[edit]Platform Name | Founder | Dates Active | Corporate Structure | Geography | Parent Company | Party Affiliation | Technology Used | Open Source | Platform Type | Software License | Primary Funders |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CitizenLab | Wietse Van Ransbeeck, Aline Muylaert, Koen Gremmelprez[2] | September 2015[3] - Present | For profit[citation needed] | Brussels, Belgium[4] | Proprietary software | No | E-democracy innovation, Consultation innovation | ||||
Pol.is | Colin Megill, Christopher Small and Michael Bjorkegren | -Present | 501(c)3 | Seattle, WA | Yes | Deliberative Democracy | AGPL v3 | ||||
Countable (app) | Bart Myers, Peter Arzintar[5] | July 2014 – Present[5] | For profit | San Francisco, California, United States | Non-partisan | ||||||
Loomio | Ben Knight[citation needed] | Nov 1, 2012[citation needed] - Present | For profit[citation needed] | Wellington, New Zealand[citation needed] | Ruby, Javascript[6] | Yes | Deliberative Innovation | AGPL v3[7] | Crowdfunding[8] | ||
DemocracyOS | Pia Mancini, Santiago Siri[citation needed] | 2012[citation needed] - Present | Non profit[citation needed] | Palo Alto, California, United States[citation needed] | Democracy Earth Foundation | Net Party[9] | JavaScript[10] | Yes | Direct Democracy Innovation | GPL v3[11] | Y Combinator, Teespring[citation needed] |
VotingWorks | Ben Adida | 2018-Present | 501(c)3 | San Francisco, CA | n/a | Yes | Open-source voting system | ||||
GovTrack | Joshua Tauberer[12] | 2003[13] - Present | Washington, District of Columbia, United States[citation needed] | Civic Impulse, LLC[14] | Django[15] | Yes | Crowdfunding | ||||
NGP Van | Mark T. Sullivan, Nathaniel Pearlman | 1997–present[citation needed] | For profit[citation needed] | Washington, DC, United States[citation needed] | Democratic and Progressive Campaigns[citation needed] | Proprietary software | No | E-democracy innovation | |||
OpenGov | Joe Lonsdale, Mike Rosengarten, Nate Levine, Zac Bookman[citation needed] | 2012–present | For profit[citation needed] | Redwood City, California, United States | JavaScript, Ruby, Java, Python[citation needed] | Yes | Emerson Collective[citation needed] | ||||
Hustle | Perry Rosenstein, Roddy Lindsay, Tyler Brock[citation needed] | Dec 2014[citation needed] | For profit[citation needed] | San Francisco, California, United States[citation needed] | Proprietary software | No | Electoral Innovation | Social Capital (venture capital) | |||
Resistbot | Jason Putorti, Eric Ries | 2017–present | 501c4 | Saint Petersburg, Florida, United States[16] | Resistbot Action Fund | Non-partisan | Python, Amazon Web Services, RapidPro, Kubernetes, PostgreSQL | Yes[17] | Electoral innovations, Consultation innovations, Co-governance innovations, E-democracy innovations | CC0 | |
LiquidFeedback | Andreas Nitsche, Jan Behrens, Axel Kistner and Bjoern Swierczek[18] | November 2009[19] | Berlin, Germany[20] | Public Software Group, Interaktive Demokratie, FlexiGuided GmbH[19] | Lua (programming language), PL/pgSQL | Yes | Deliberative Innovation | MIT License | |||
TurboVote | Kathryn Peters, Seth Flaxman[citation needed] | 2010–present [citation needed] | For profit[citation needed] | Democracy Works[21] | Proprietary software | No | Electoral Innovation | ||||
We The People | Obama administration | September 2011 – Present | Government Agency | Washington, DC, United States | Democratic Party | JavaScript, PHP, CSS[22] | Yes | Co-governance Innovation | GNU General Public License[22] | United States Government | |
Voatz | Nimit S. Sawhney[citation needed] | 2014–present[citation needed] | For profit[citation needed] | Boston, Massachusetts, United States[23] | Go[24] | No | Electoral Innovation | Medici Ventures[citation needed] | |||
Helios Voting | Ben Adida | 2008–present[25] | Non profit | Python, JavaScript, HTML[26] | Yes | Direct Democracy Innovation | Apache License[26] | ||||
U Report | UNICEF Innovation[27] | May 2011 – Present[28] | Non profit | New York, United States | UNICEF | Python, HTML, CSS[29] | Yes | Consultation Innovation | GNU Affero General Public License[29] | ||
Maji Voice | Water Services Regulatory Board (WASREB) | 2012–present[30] | Government Agency | Nairobi, Kenya | Water Services Regulatory Board (WASREB) | Open Source[30] | Yes | Consultation Innovation | GNU General Public License[31] | World Bank Water and Sanitation Program[30] | |
Democracy 2.1 | Karel Janeček | 2013–present | Prague Municipal District, Czech Republic | Proprietary software | No | Direct Democracy Innovation | |||||
Secure Vote | Max Kaye, Nathan Spataro[32] | 2016–present[32] | New South Wales, Australia[32] | Python, HTML, Shell,[33] Blockchain[32] | No | Direct Democracy Innovation | MIT License | ||||
Brigade | James Windon, Jason Putorti, John Thrall, Matt Mahan, Miche Capone[citation needed] | Jun 11, 2014[34] - May 1, 2019[35] | For profit | San Francisco, California, United States[36] | Brigade Media | Proprietary software | No | Electoral Innovation, Deliberative Innovation | Marc Benioff, Ron Conway, Sean Parker[37] |
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Smith, Graham (2005). "Beyond the ballot: 57 democratic innovations from around the world". westminsterresearch.wmin.ac.uk. POWER Inquiry. Retrieved 2018-04-18.
- ^ "CitizenLab". www.forbes.com. Retrieved 2018-05-14.
- ^ "CitizenLab". www.facebook.com. Retrieved 2018-05-12.
- ^ "About us - CitizenLab". citizenlab.co. Retrieved 2018-05-14.
- ^ a b "Countable Wants To Make Politics A 'Continual Conversation'". TechCrunch. 16 July 2014. Retrieved 2019-12-31.
- ^ "loomio/loomio". GitHub. Retrieved 2018-04-02.
- ^ "loomio/loomio". GitHub. Retrieved 2018-04-02.
- ^ "Out in the Open: Occupy Wall Street Reincarnated as Open Source Software". WIRED. Retrieved 2018-04-02.
- ^ "A Conversation With DemocracyOS, The YC Non-Profit That Built A Latin American Political Party – TechCrunch". techcrunch.com. 17 April 2015. Retrieved 2018-04-02.
- ^ "DemocracyOS/democracyos". GitHub. Retrieved 2018-04-02.
- ^ "DemocracyOS/democracyos". GitHub. Retrieved 2018-04-02.
- ^ "Web site a pork hunting ground / It joins others aiding analysis of bills for 'earmark' signs". SFGate. Retrieved 2018-04-02.
- ^ "Joshua Tauberer's Homepage". razor.occams.info. Retrieved 2018-04-02.
- ^ "govtrack/civic-impulse-llc". GitHub. Retrieved 2018-04-02.
- ^ "govtrack/govtrack.us-web". GitHub. Retrieved 2018-04-02.
- ^ "Resistbot". resist.bot. Retrieved 2019-12-31.
- ^ Form definitions powering Resistbot's electronic deliveries to elected officials in the United States.: resistbot/contact-officials, Resistbot, 2019-12-30, retrieved 2019-12-31
- ^ "Etopia News L.A. talks with Andreas Nitsche | Interaktive Demokratie". www.interaktive-demokratie.org. Retrieved 2018-04-22.
- ^ a b "Information Kit (PDF)" (PDF).
- ^ "LiquidFeedback - The democracy software". liquidfeedback.org. Retrieved 2018-04-22.
- ^ "Democracy Works: Democracy Fund". www.democracyfund.org. Retrieved 2018-04-11.
- ^ a b "WhiteHouse/petitions". GitHub. Retrieved 2018-04-23.
- ^ "Voatz". angel.co. Retrieved 2018-04-19.
- ^ "blacktreebird/voatz". GitHub. Retrieved 2018-04-19.
- ^ Adida, Marneffe, Pereira, Quisquater, Ben, Olivier, Olivier, Jean-Jacques. "Electing a University President using Open-Audit Voting: Analysis of real-world use of Helios" (PDF).
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ a b "benadida/helios-server". GitHub. Retrieved 2018-04-23.
- ^ "U-Report: Ilhasoft's application for Unicef - Ilhasoft". Ilhasoft. 2016-01-12. Retrieved 2018-04-23.
- ^ "U-report application revolutionizes social mobilization, empowering Ugandan youth". UNICEF. Retrieved 2018-04-23.
- ^ a b "rapidpro/ureport". GitHub. Retrieved 2018-04-23.
- ^ a b c "WB Maji Voice Policy Note" (PDF).
- ^ "CustomerFeedbackSystem/code". GitHub. 15 August 2015. Retrieved 2018-04-23.
- ^ a b c d "SecureVote". Techboard. 2017-04-26. Retrieved 2018-04-19.
- ^ "muminoff/securevote". GitHub. 18 May 2016. Retrieved 2018-04-19.
- ^ "Sean Parker's Brigade Media Acquires Causes In Its Quest To Revitalize American Democracy". TechCrunch. 11 June 2014. Retrieved 2019-12-31.
- ^ "Sean Parker's Brigade/Causes acquired by govtech app Countable". TechCrunch. May 2019. Retrieved 2019-12-31.
- ^ "Follow Brigade on Index.co". Index.co. Retrieved 2018-04-02.
- ^ "Brigade Media Raises $9.3M From Sean Parker To Shake Up American Democracy". TechCrunch. 14 April 2014. Retrieved 2019-12-31.