Cerebellar model articulation controller
The cerebellar model arithmetic computer (CMAC) is a type of neural network based on a model of the mammalian cerebellum. It is also known as the cerebellar model articulation controller. It is a type of associative memory.[2]
The CMAC was first proposed as a function modeler for robotic controllers by James Albus in 1975[1] (hence the name), but has been extensively used in reinforcement learning and also as for automated classification in the machine learning community. The CMAC is an extension of the perceptron model. It computes a function for input dimensions. The input space is divided up into hyper-rectangles, each of which is associated with a memory cell. The contents of the memory cells are the weights, which are adjusted during training. Usually, more than one quantisation of input space is used, so that any point in input space is associated with a number of hyper-rectangles, and therefore with a number of memory cells. The output of a CMAC is the algebraic sum of the weights in all the memory cells activated by the input point.
A change of value of the input point results in a change in the set of activated hyper-rectangles, and therefore a change in the set of memory cells participating in the CMAC output. The CMAC output is therefore stored in a distributed fashion, such that the output corresponding to any point in input space is derived from the value stored in a number of memory cells (hence the name associative memory). This provides generalisation.
Building blocks
[edit]
In the adjacent image, there are two inputs to the CMAC, represented as a 2D space. Two quantising functions have been used to divide this space with two overlapping grids (one shown in heavier lines). A single input is shown near the middle, and this has activated two memory cells, corresponding to the shaded area. If another point occurs close to the one shown, it will share some of the same memory cells, providing generalisation.
The CMAC is trained by presenting pairs of input points and output values, and adjusting the weights in the activated cells by a proportion of the error observed at the output. This simple training algorithm has a proof of convergence.[3]
It is normal to add a kernel function to the hyper-rectangle, so that points falling towards the edge of a hyper-rectangle have a smaller activation than those falling near the centre.[4]
One of the major problems cited in practical use of CMAC is the memory size required, which is directly related to the number of cells used. This is usually ameliorated by using a hash function, and only providing memory storage for the actual cells that are activated by inputs.
One-step convergent algorithm
[edit]Initially least mean square (LMS) method is employed to update the weights of CMAC. The convergence of using LMS for training CMAC is sensitive to the learning rate and could lead to divergence. In 2004,[5] a recursive least squares (RLS) algorithm was introduced to train CMAC online. It does not need to tune a learning rate. Its convergence has been proved theoretically and can be guaranteed to converge in one step. The computational complexity of this RLS algorithm is O(N3).
Hardware implementation infrastructure
[edit]Based on QR decomposition, an algorithm (QRLS) has been further simplified to have an O(N) complexity. Consequently, this reduces memory usage and time cost significantly. A parallel pipeline array structure on implementing this algorithm has been introduced.[6]
Overall by utilizing QRLS algorithm, the CMAC neural network convergence can be guaranteed, and the weights of the nodes can be updated using one step of training. Its parallel pipeline array structure offers its great potential to be implemented in hardware for large-scale industry usage.
Continuous CMAC
[edit]Since the rectangular shape of CMAC receptive field functions produce discontinuous staircase function approximation, by integrating CMAC with B-splines functions, continuous CMAC offers the capability of obtaining any order of derivatives of the approximate functions.
Deep CMAC
[edit]In recent years, numerous studies have confirmed that by stacking several shallow structures into a single deep structure, the overall system could achieve better data representation, and, thus, more effectively deal with nonlinear and high complexity tasks. In 2018,[7] a deep CMAC (DCMAC) framework was proposed and a backpropagation algorithm was derived to estimate the DCMAC parameters. Experimental results of an adaptive noise cancellation task showed that the proposed DCMAC can achieve better noise cancellation performance when compared with that from the conventional single-layer CMAC.
Summary
[edit]| Scalability | Straightforward to extend to millions of neurons or further |
| Convergence | The training can always converge in one step |
| Function derivatives | Straightforward to obtain by employing B-splines interpolation |
| Hardware structure | Parallel pipeline structure |
| Memory usage | Linear with respect to the number of neurons |
| Computational complexity | O(N) |
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ a b Albus, J. S. (1 September 1975). "A New Approach to Manipulator Control: The Cerebellar Model Articulation Controller (CMAC)". Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control. 97 (3): 220–227. doi:10.1115/1.3426922. ISSN 0022-0434.
- ^ Albus, James S. (August 1979). "Mechanisms of planning and problem solving in the brain". Mathematical Biosciences. 45 (3–4): 247–293. doi:10.1016/0025-5564(79)90063-4.
- ^ Wong, Y.; Sideris, A. (January 1992). "Learning convergence in the cerebellar model articulation controller". IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks. 3 (1): 115–121. doi:10.1109/72.105424.
- ^ P.C.E. An, W.T. Miller, and P.C. Parks, Design Improvements in Associative Memories for Cerebellar Model Articulation Controllers, Proc. ICANN, pp. 1207–10, 1991.
- ^ Qin, Ting; Chen, Zonghai; Zhang, Haitao; Li, Sifu; Xiang, Wei; Li, Ming (1 February 2004). "A Learning Algorithm of CMAC Based on RLS". Neural Processing Letters. 19 (1): 49–61. doi:10.1023/B:NEPL.0000016847.18175.60. ISSN 1573-773X.
- ^ a b Qin, Ting; Zhang, Haitao; Chen, Zonghai; Xiang, Wei (1 August 2005). "Continuous CMAC-QRLS and Its Systolic Array". Neural Processing Letters. 22 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1007/s11063-004-2694-0. ISSN 1573-773X.
- ^ Tsa, Yu; Chu, Hao-Chun; Fang, Shih-Hau; Lee, Junghsi; Lin, Chih-Min (2018). "Adaptive Noise Cancellation Using Deep Cerebellar Model Articulation Controller". IEEE Access. 6: 37395–37402. arXiv:1705.00945. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2827699. ISSN 2169-3536.
Further reading
[edit]- Albus, J.S. (1971). "Theory of Cerebellar Function". In: Mathematical Biosciences, Volume 10, Numbers 1/2, February 1971, pgs. 25–61
- Albus, J.S. (1975). "New Approach to Manipulator Control: The Cerebellar Model Articulation Controller (CMAC)". In: Transactions of the ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, September 1975, pgs. 220 – 227
- Albus, J.S. (1979). "Mechanisms of Planning and Problem Solving in the Brain". In: Mathematical Biosciences 45, pgs 247–293, 1979.
- Iwan, L., and Stengel, R., "The Application of Neural Networks to Fuel Processors for Fuel Cells" In IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 50 (1), pp. 125-143, 2001.
- Tsao, Y. (2018). "Adaptive Noise Cancellation Using Deep Cerebellar Model Articulation Controller". In: IEEE Access 6, April 2018, pgs 37395-37402.
External links
[edit]- Blog on Cerebellar Model Articulation Controller (CMAC) by Ting Qin. More details on the one-step convergent algorithm, code development, etc.