Category talk:WaPoCheckDates
WaPoCheckDates
[edit]Hi, I see you created {{WaPoCheckDates}} and added it to Creative technology, an article that for some inexplicable reason I have on my watchlist. I see Category:WaPoCheckDates, too.
Is this a paywall thing? I'm a WP subscriber and can have a look at these if that's helpful. TJRC (talk) 21:44, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @TJRC! Thanks for being so eagle-eyed, and for your kind offer of help.
- This is not a paywall problem; it is an inconsistent metadata problem. The Washington Post (WaPo) uses weirdly structured webpages, and not even consistently weird: the structure has been through several major revisions.
- As a result, @Citation bot cannot fill WP:Bare URLs to WaPo. And other tools such as WP:REFLINKS and WP:REFILL do a poor job.
- This left a backlog of over 900 en.wp articles with bare URL links to WaPo, the biggest backlog for any website (see this search of WaPO bare URLs). I spent a day writing a Perl script to fill WaPo refs, and got it working well, but with one glitch: I could not establish a clear correlation between the dates I found in the metadata and the dates displayed on-screen.
- After tearing my hair out for a while, I decided that where there was ambiguity, I would just mark the ref as needing a manual check of the dates. Of the 142 articles processed so far, 42 are tracked in Category:WaPoCheckDates.
- I was planning to do tackle this myself, and check one-by-one whether the dates in the cite templates tally with those displayed onscreen on the WaPo site. But if you (or anyone else) has the energy to help out by tackling some of them, that would be great.
- The "pay up" box which appears without a sub usually leaves just about enough visible to check the dates. But it would be easier with a subscription, and no "pay-up" notice. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:43, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
(Copied from Brown Haired Girl's talk archive) All the best: Rich Farmbrough 11:33, 22 September 2024 (UTC).
11:33, 22 September 2024 (UTC)