This category is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Many of these clubs are described as "elite", "exclusive" and "prestigious". I'm sure they are (some of them, at least), but are these characterisations appropriate for an objective encyclopaedia? What does anyone think of replacing them simply with the epithet "private"?
45ossington15:15, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
While I appreciate your attempt to be journalistic, I think it is OK to call these clubs "prestigious". It is certainly correct to call them "exclusive". I suspect that 99% of Americans believe the 9/11 firefighters were "brave". Likewise, I think that it is safe to say that these clubs are "prestigious". Is it subjective? Yes, but it is also reality. 76.80.161.23618:05, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]