Category talk:Law stubs

This category is maintained by WikiProject Stub sorting, an attempt to bring some sort of order to Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to improve/expand the articles containing this stub notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Stub sortingWikipedia:WikiProject Stub sortingTemplate:WikiProject Stub sortingStub sorting articles

Law

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles

Sub-categories

I've noticed quite a few articles in the generic "law-stub" category that fit better in the sub-categories (i.e. Canadian-law-stub, UK-law-stub, etc.). Wouldn't it be best for us to go through the many articles in the "law-stub" category and recategorize when appropriate? --Micahbrwn 05:15, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

absolutely. They have been sorted in the past but it always happens that the generic labels pile up and need to be sorted again. PullUpYourSocks 18:07, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Admittedly, I don't know a lot about edits, but could we send in a bot or two to sort out the stubs? --Micahbrwn 00:00, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think I must've almost halved the number today from 1500+ to 800. Time for a break...Misterx2000 (talk) 19:35, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Book stub?

What about a "law-book-stub"? Would there be enough to justify it, including books on the Supreme Court, international law, copyright law, legal history, etc etc? Her Pegship 16:45, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am sure this discussion is long dead, more than two years old, but in case anyone is watching this, I agree. I am creating a new stub about a legal book -- Jeffrey Toobin's "The Nine" -- and this would be much more helpful than "book-stub". I see lots of other stubs for history, philosophy, politics books. Why not law? --Mr. Bergstrom (talk) 14:40, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]