Jump to content

Thought-terminating cliché

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Bumper sticker logic)

A thought-terminating cliché (also known as a semantic stop-sign, a thought-stopper, bumper sticker logic, or cliché thinking) is a form of loaded language, often passing as folk wisdom, intended to end an argument and quell cognitive dissonance.[1][2] Its function is to stop an argument from proceeding further, ending the debate with a cliché rather than a point. Some such clichés are not inherently terminating. They only become so when used to intentionally dismiss dissent or justify fallacious logic.[3]

The term was popularized by Robert Jay Lifton in his 1961 book Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism, who referred to the use of the cliché, along with "loading the language", as "the language of non-thought".[4]

Origin and definitions

[edit]
R. J. Lifton's definition

The language of the totalist environment is characterized by the thought-terminating cliché. The most far-reaching and complex of human problems are compressed into brief, highly reductive, definitive-sounding phrases, easily memorized, and easily expressed. They become the start and finish of any ideological analysis.

Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism, Chapter 22: "Ideological Totalism" (1961)

The earliest recorded definition of the term was published in Robert Jay Lifton's book Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism in 1961 wherein he was describing the structure of language used by the Chinese Communist Party, defining the term as "the start and finish of any ideological analysis". It was listed as the sixth (of eight) totalistic themes.[4] The term is written under the sixth (of eight) criteria for thought reform 'Loading the Language', of which various authors and scholars also consider the term to be a form of loaded language.[4][5][6]

Charles 'Chaz' Bufe in his book Alcoholics Anonymous: Cult or Cure? (1997) broadly put the use of the cliché as "thought-stopping phrases (that) include any use of the language, especially repeated phrases, to ward off forbidden thoughts" in describing his interactions with the Alcoholics Anonymous aid movement.[5] Author, show-host and doctor Robert 'Bo' Bennett described the term as a substitute for "a person's actual position or argument with a distorted, exaggerated, or misrepresented version of the position of the argument" in his 2017 book Logically Fallacious, along with a proposed logical form of the cliché; "Person 1 makes claim Y. Claim Y sounds catchy. Therefore, claim Y is true."[3]

The Southern California Law Review, Volume 51, Part 1, describes the use of such clichés as "to capture the vehicles of thought and communication; 'Doctrine over reality' (which includes the rewriting of history and reinterpretation of one's past)" and as a property of "ideological totalists".[7]

Bennett explains that exceptions are made to the use of phrases that would otherwise be considered thought-terminating if they are used in addition to evidence or strong claims.[3]

Examples

[edit]
  • "It's not that deep." — dismisses attempts to expose faulty logic by asserting that logic isn't necessary in this particular case.[8]
  • "Lies of the devil." – used as a response to any fact that threatens the integrity of an individual or group[9]
  • "Stop thinking so much." – redirects attention from the topic, idea, or argument at hand to the alleged overuse of thought itself[10]
  • "It's all good." – nullifies, without evidence, any possible debate by asserting the issue is already settled[11]
  • "Here we go again." – implies that the redundant, cyclical nature of a given disagreement means it will never be resolved[12]
  • "So what? What effect does my action have?" – used to dismiss an individual's involvement in a larger cause on the grounds that one person is too insignificant to ever have a meaningful impact[2]
  • "Let's agree to disagree." – used to stop discussion of an issue rather than attempt to resolve it[13]
  • "It is what it is." – implies that things are unchangeable, therefore there is no point in further discussion[14]

Politics

[edit]

Two criticisms made by various journalists are that the cliché tends to halt debate and restrict or censor freedom of speech, or tends to be synonymous with language that would be used by totalitarian states as Lifton originally identified with Communist China. Chancellor Adolf Hitler of Nazi Germany is remarked to have employed such clichés and platitudes to justify his actions prior to and during the events of World War II.[15]

In Joan Didion's essay "Good Citizens", included in her 1979 collection The White Album, Didion writes of the clichés used by the people she sees as comprising 1960s "liberal Hollywood": "It is a way of talking that tends to preclude further discussion, which may well be its intention."

David Volodzko in The Diplomat in 2015 characterized China's justification for persecuting Tibetans, Uyghurs, Falun Gong, artists, and journalists (including Liu Xiaobo), summed up as "for security reasons", as a thought-terminating cliché, going on to say "that's every bit as vapid as 'God moves in a mysterious way' or 'support our troops'. What it really means is that the Party is more important than the people."[16]

Religion

[edit]

An example of the cliché in use provided by Chaz Bufe is "the admonition given to Catholic schoolchildren to recite the Hail Mary or rosary to ward off 'impure thoughts'. The use of repetitive chanting by the Hare Krishnas serves the same thought-stopping purpose."[5] Christian author Ann Morisy criticized the Christian Church for their uses of such clichés coinciding with their doctrines that intentionally reduce the possibility of dialogue, stating that failure to move beyond them risks falling prey "to a new version of gnosticism" along with alienating those not of the faith.[10] Scientology has also been criticized for using protocols, language and lexicons that use thought-terminating clichés to condition its members or to reaffirm a confirmation bias, which makes it difficult for members to think "outside the box".[17][18]

Fictional applications

[edit]
  • George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four – The totalitarian state Oceania implements Newspeak, a "pared-down version of English in which 'dangerous' words like 'freedom' no longer exist". Kathleen Taylor suggests in a case study that the words that remain as a result of the diminishing of the English language are ideologically loaded, and are "clear examples of Lifton's thought-terminating clichés".[6][15]
  • Aldous Huxley's Brave New World – The "Utopian" Society uses thought-terminating clichés more conventionally, most notably regarding the drug soma as well as modified versions of real-life platitudes, such as, "A doctor a day keeps the jim-jams away."[15]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Jenicek, Milos (2011). Medical error and harm: understanding, prevention, and control. New York: Productivity Press/CRC Press. ISBN 9781439836958. OCLC 680038936.
  2. ^ a b Chiras, Daniel D. (1992), "Teaching Critical Thinking Skills in the Biology & Environmental Science Classrooms", The American Biology Teacher, 54 (8): 464–468, doi:10.2307/4449551, JSTOR 4449551
  3. ^ a b c Bennett, Bo (2017). Logically Fallacious: The Ultimate Collection of Over 300 Logical Fallacies. eBookIt.com. ISBN 978-1456607371 – via Google Books.
  4. ^ a b c Lifton, Robert J. (1989) [1961]. "Chapter 22, Ideological Totalism". Thought reform and the psychology of totalism: A study of brainwashing in China (reprint ed.). UNC Press. p. 429. ISBN 9780807842539 – via Google Books.
  5. ^ a b c Bufe, Charles (1 December 1997) [1991]. "Chapter 9: Is AA a Cult?". Alcoholics Anonymous: Cult or Cure? (2nd, revised ed.). See Sharp Press. ISBN 1884365752 – via Google Books.
  6. ^ a b Taylor, Kathleen (27 July 2006) [2004]. "The birth of a word". Brainwashing: The Science of Thought Control (illustrated, reprint ed.). OUP Oxford. pp. 17, 21. ISBN 0199204780 – via Google Books.
  7. ^ Delgado, Richard (1978). "Religious Totalism: Gentle and Ungentle Persuasion Under the First Amendment". Southern California Law Review. 51: 68.
  8. ^ Eettickal, Enya. "It's not that deep, or is it?". The Observer. Retrieved 18 July 2024.
  9. ^ Martin, Paul (1993). Cult proofing your kids. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Zondervan Pub. House. p. 189. ISBN 0310537614. OCLC 26973667.
  10. ^ a b Morisy, Ann (2009). Bothered and bewildered: enacting hope in troubled times. London: Continuum. ISBN 9781441163929. OCLC 680017855.
  11. ^ Gwazi, Dinfa (20 May 2017). "The Rise of The Thought Terminating Cliche & Bumper Sticker Logic in The Era of Trump". Medium. Retrieved 10 May 2019.
  12. ^ Clampitt, Phillip G.; Williams, M. Lee (Winter 2007), "Decision Downloading", MIT Sloan Management Review, vol. 48, no. 2, retrieved 25 October 2016
  13. ^ Simpson, Katherine; Marcum, Anthony (4 November 2022). "CETA - where are the women? Diffusing the thought-terminating clichés that impeded diversity". Diversity in International Arbitration. Edward Elgar Publishing. pp. 119–134. doi:10.4337/9781803920047.00016. ISBN 978-1-80392-004-7.
  14. ^ Klein, Emily G.; Hendler, James (2022), "Loaded Language and Conspiracy Theorizing", Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, vol. 44, no. 44, retrieved 14 June 2024
  15. ^ a b c Soni, I. M. (August 2017). "Cliches are like base coins". Alive. p. 88.
  16. ^ Volodzko, David. "China's Biggest Taboos: The Three Ts". The Diplomat. Retrieved 9 May 2019.
  17. ^ Peterson, Britt (19 March 2015), "Scientology's enturbulating lingo", Boston Globe, retrieved 25 October 2016
  18. ^ Sanders, Ash (24 June 2019). "Children of Scientology: Life After Growing Up in an Alleged Cult". Rolling Stone. Retrieved 7 August 2019.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thought-terminating_cliché&oldid=1255629873"