Boven-Digoel concentration camp
Boven-Digoel | |
---|---|
Country | Kingdom of the Netherlands |
Colony | Dutch East Indies |
Location | Tanahmerah and other sites on the banks of the river Digul in Molukken Residency |
Opened | 1927 |
Closed | 1947 |
Founded by | Dutch colonial government |
Boven-Digoel, often simply called Digoel, was a Dutch concentration camp for political detainees operated in the Dutch East Indies from 1927 to 1947. The Dutch used it to detain thousands of Indonesians, most of whom were members of the Communist Party of Indonesia (PKI), Indonesian nationalists, and their families. It was located in a remote area on the banks of the river Digul, in what is now Boven Digoel Regency in South Papua, Indonesia. The camp was originally opened to exiled communists after the failed 1926 uprisings in Java and Sumatra; at its largest extent in 1930 it held around 1300 internees and 700 family members.
History
[edit]For hundreds of years, the Dutch authorities in the Indies exiled politically unwanted figures in a variety of places, including what is now Eastern Indonesia, as well as deportation outside the colony to Europe or the Dutch Cape Colony.[1] An early example of exile as punishment took place during the French and British interregnum in the Dutch East Indies, when Stamford Raffles exiled convicts to Karimunjawa.[2] Starting in 1854, the Governor-general of the Dutch East Indies was entitled to exile any resident of the colony without charge or explanation per his "Extraordinary rights" (Dutch: exorbitante rechten) to preserve peace and order.[2]
De Graeff era (1926–31)
[edit]This tactic of exiling politically unwanted Indonesians was generally used on a one-off basis until the late 1920s. Following the start of a communist uprising in West Java on 12 November 1926, there was an emergency meeting of the Council of the Dutch East Indies where Governor General Andries Cornelis Dirk de Graeff insisted that a large number of communist leaders across the Indies had to be rounded up as soon as possible.[1][3]
Dutch repression against the communist uprisings involved thousands of Indonesians. Roughly 4500 were accused of participating directly in the uprising and were imprisoned or sentenced to death, while another 8500 had not committed any specific crime.[4] Those party members, journalists, and other associates who had no provable link to the events were still considered a problem by the Dutch.[4][2][5] They expanded their targets from "principal" leaders to almost anyone who had taken an identifiable leadership role in the PKI, and then to new leaders who would take the place of those who were exiled.[1] Out of the remaining 8500, around a thousand were identified as troublesome.[4] De Graeff thought that a formal trial would give them a platform to spread their message, and decided that these should be exiled, ideally all to the same place.[2][1] In the period following the communist uprising, the political police force was also expanded.[3]
By early December, a site at Boven-Digoel in an isolated part of Papua was identified as an ideal place for the mass exile by Royal Netherlands East Indies Army (KNIL) Captain Theo Becking, who had led the repression of the uprising in Java.[1][6] This location was 450 kilometres up the Digul river and was a barren, sparsely populated area with endemic Malaria.[1][7] It was originally thought to be suitable for rice cultivation and agriculture.[8] Papuan people who lived in the area were initially hostile to the establishment of the camp. Captain Becking was sent to the Tanah Merah site with KNIL soldiers and convict laborers to prepare the camp.[1] They arrived in January 1927 and built a dock on the river, barracks, a hospital, a radio station and post office, and other infrastructure.[9] The first group of fifty internees arrived in March, accompanied by thirty family members, and Becking became the first camp administrator.[9] The Danish travel writer Aage Krarup Nielsen was allowed to sail on the monthlong trip with this first group of exiles.[10]
More boatloads of internees and their families continued to arrive throughout the year, and M. A. Monsjou, a civil servant who had been Controller at Fakfak replaced Becking as administrator at the end of October.[9][11] Internees were allowed to bring personal items with them from Java and Sumatra.[12] Forced labour was used at first, but quickly abandoned when camp authorities decided that internees were willing to work hard voluntarily to improve their living situation.[13] After that, internees who were willing to work for the public good were paid a regular wage instead.[14][15] Although the internees were managed and surveilled, the camp was not known for strict discipline by guards or prison-like conditions; internees were allowed to work and live "normally" in this place of exile.[2] It was certainly never intended to be an extermination camp like Auschwitz concentration camp; the historian Rudolf Mrázek compared it instead to Theresienstadt Ghetto.[16][17] There were no fences around the camp, but the surrounding terrain was so difficult that escape was almost impossible.[18][14] The only part of the camp that was surrounded with barbed wire was the military camp where the 100 KNIL soldiers and administrators lived. This was explicitly done to separate its residents from the internees and to keep them away from political propaganda.[18]
A subset of internees, including many of the most ideological communists, refused to work and were considered "irreconcilables" (Dutch: onverzoenlijken) by the Dutch.[2] These even sabotaged the crops and efforts of the cooperative detainees. Therefore a second, more remote camp site called Tanah Tinggi was created for them, 50 kilometres or five hours' motorboat trip upriver from Tanah Merah.[18] Internees in that separate camp, who were also called "naturalists," were mostly isolated from the economy and life in the Tanah Merah camp and only received limited monthly rations of food, which they supplemented with gardening and fishing.[4]
Meanwhile the main camp at Tanah Merah continued to be built up. A Chinese Indonesian shopkeeper from Ambon was permitted to open two shops, one on the administrative side and one for the internees.[18] By February 1928 the camps contained 666 internees and 437 family members.[9] A handful of the exiles were female activists; these included Soetitah who was chair of the women's section of the Communist party.[19] As Digoel grew, it started to attract the attention of the press. The liberal Dutch journalist Marcus van Blankenstein was allowed to visit the camp; his scathing articles in the Nieuwe Rotterdamsche Courant in the fall of 1928 suggested that innocent people had been imprisoned there without charge, and that sanitary conditions were so poor (especially in the Tanah Tinggi camp) that people were dying "like rats during a plague".[9][20][21][22] After that, the government promised to release detainees who were well-behaved and did not pose a threat to peace and order.[9] By 1929 the detainees in Tanah Merah were living in six "hamlets" made up of shacks with tin roofs; the original barracks were dismantled.[2] Internees generally settled along ethnic lines, with Sumatrans, Javanese, Madurese, and people from Banten (where the 1926 revolt had been centered) living in their own sections.[18] A mosque, Protestant and Catholic churches, and shops were built.[2][18] Sports and theatre groups and musical ensembles were also established, including a jazz band led by Abdoe'lxarim MS and a kroncong band.[18][23] The detainees also had gardens, but the poor soil made their yield limited.[2] Despite those activities which give the impression of a normal life, morale was quite low and living conditions remained difficult.[18][14] Even the administrator Monsjou contracted malaria and left the region for Surabaya for several months in early 1929.[24]
While internees were generally kept isolated from news of the outside world, they were allowed to write letters, although these could be censored.[8] So, many complained to newspapers; one former journalist, Lie Eng Hok, wrote a letter to his former paper Sin Po in 1929 about worsening conditions, which was translated and reprinted in the Dutch press.[25][26] In it, he noted that the camp authorities had reduced the prisoners' stipend by one quarter and that by the following year, they would no longer receive any at all, and that the prisoners were becoming so poor that they could no longer afford to spend money on each others' "businesses". Another issue was that the tree cover had been so thoroughly cleared to make space for the camp that there was no shade from the sun in most of the camps.[27] Food was also substandard a lot of the time, although there was always some available.[28] The fact that their imprisonment was indefinite and that there was no way to appeal it also contributed to the general sense of misery among detainees.[2]
A member of the Council of the Netherland Indies, W. P. Hillen, was sent to inspect the camp in April 1930.[9] At that point the camp was at its largest, with 1308 internees and around 700 family members.[9] He interviewed hundreds of internees and decided that the local officials had been too optimistic in their reports to the colonial government, noting that many of the internees were unwilling to work for the government on principle and were living in poor conditions.[9] In his final report he said that roughly two thirds of the 600 internees he interviewed should be released, and he expressed his doubts that Tanah Merah was a suitable place for long-term settlement, due to the poor soil and prevalence of malaria. He thought authorities should gradually release all but the most recalcitrant detainees and that they should eventually be relocated to populated areas.[9] Governor General de Graeff was convinced, and released 219 internees in December 1930. This emptied out several of the "districts" of the Tanah Merah camp, and many of those released stayed away from politics after returning to Java and Sumatra.[29]
De Jonge era (1931–36)
[edit]Bonifacius Cornelis de Jonge, a conservative aristocrat, became Governor General in September 1931. He disagreed with the idea of gradually reducing the camp's population until it could be closed; fear of exile among Indonesian nationalists in Java and Sumatra was considered to be an added benefit.[9][2] Since it would not be closed, doses of quinine were prescribed to internees to reduce cases of malaria.[2] It helped somewhat, but a number of high-profile prisoners died, including Marco Kartodikromo who died of malaria in 1932, and Aliarcham who died of tuberculosis in 1933.[18][30]
De Jonge renovated and further developed the camp, despite the Indies' financial difficulties as a result of the Great Depression.[18] In the first two years of his term it was still communists and other leftists who were being exiled to Digoel, including those who had finished prison terms for participating in the 1926 uprising.[9] Members of new groups, such as Tan Malaka's Pari party started to be exiled as well.[9] It was in 1933 and 1934 that the government turned its attention to non-communist nationalists.[9] Members of the Persatuan Muslim Indonesia, the Partai Sarekat Islam Indonesia, Partindo, and other groups were targeted.[9][4] Eventually even high profile intellectuals such as Mohammad Hatta, who would become the first vice president of Indonesia, and Sutan Sjahrir, future first Indonesian Prime Minister were both exiled in 1935.[31][32] However, they were relocated to the Banda Islands a few months later, as Digoel was considered too harsh a destination for them.[2][33] This set a precedent and from then on university-educated intellectuals were generally exiled there and not to Digoel.[9]
Van Starkenborgh era (1936–42)
[edit]Alidius Tjarda van Starkenborgh Stachouwer, who would be the last colonial Governor General of the Indies, took over for de Jonge in September 1936. He kept Boven Digoel open as a part of the system of repression against Indonesian nationalists. An Attorney General report at around that time examined the situation of hundreds of ex-Digoel internees who had been freed. Many of these were still under police surveillance, but the report decided that they did not have to be re-exiled unless they were still active in hardline communist groups.[9] The report also determined that the 70 "uncooperative" detainees in the Tanah Tinggi camp should remain there indefinitely.[9]
In 1936, the camp doctor L. J. A. Schoonheyt published a book about his experiences there in which he claimed conditions in the camp were ideal and even pleasant; copies of the book made their way back to camp internees who were enraged by his whitewashing.[34][35]
A gold mining company set up in Tanah Merah in 1937, which led to the construction of an airfield and much higher traffic of foreign ships.[18]
In the late 1930s, the Dutch continued to use Digoel as a way to threaten dissidents in the Indies. Their presence there was also maintained as a Dutch presence in face of Japanese expansionism.[2] In 1938 the Governor General proposed that twelve more communists be exiled there, including members of Pari but also PKI members who had been in clandestine communication with communists in the Netherlands.[36][37] These people who were nominated for exile were kept in "pretrial detention" for some time.[38]
The gold mining company folded in 1939 and dismantled its infrastructure.[18] In May 1940, the Dutch colonial ministry decided to stop referring to Boven-Digoel as a concentration camp, seeing how the Nazi use of such camps was making it politically unpopular; they sent a memo to all departments to cease using that term.[39] Following the German invasion of the Netherlands, there was speculation that members of the Dutch fascist party Nationaal-Socialistische Beweging would be interned at Boven Digoel.[2] In the end, they were deported to Jodensavanne internment camp in Surinam instead. Among these were Captain Becking, the founder of the camp, and Dr. Schoonheyt, both of whom had joined the NSB in the late 1930s.[40] But Indonesians continued to be exiled to Digoel until the final weeks of Dutch rule; the last one seems to have been a Chinese-Indonesian clerk from Sumatra who had been active in an anti-Japanaese and pro-communist group.[2]
Japanese occupation and closure (1942–47)
[edit]Despite the Japanese invasion of the Dutch East Indies and the fall of Dutch rule, Boven Digoel was so physically remote that it was essentially unaffected.[2] By this time the Tanah Merah camp had 295 internees and 212 family members living in it.[4] The camp now fell under the directions of a government in exile which had been set up in Australia in April 1942.[4] In February 1943 there were rumours of a Japanese invasion at Merauke and U.S. General Douglas MacArthur identified the political prisoners as a possible fifth column.[4] Charles van der Plas, a key member of the government in exile, made most of the decisions about the detainees' fate during the war. In March, 512 people were sent from Digoel to Australia, including 22 from Tanah Tinggi.[4] A few, mainly Tanah Tinggi residents, remained in Digoel by their own choice.[2][41] The Australian government had some objections to the transfer; detainees were initially imprisoned in Liverpool, New South Wales and in a newly built section of the Cowra POW camp, but were released after complaints from trade unions and the Communist Party of Australia.[2][4] Some of those went on to work on farms and munitions factories or, in the case of some non-communist nationalists, in anti-Japanese propaganda efforts.[4] After the end of the war in August 1945, after some concerns that they would be re-imprisoned, the Dutch East Indies government in exile annuled the exile orders against 267 who were in Australia.[2]
With the departure of the Japanese, the Dutch reasserted control over the Indies through the Netherlands Indies Civil Administration and entered into conflict with nationalists in what is called the Indonesian National Revolution. Van der Plas was now a member of NICA; seeing the outbreak of the Revolution, he anticipated that they camp would soon be filled again with a new round of exiles.[2] Instead, the camp started to be dismantled in 1946 and the remaining 24 detainees were freed.[2]
Legacy and literary representation
[edit]Several accounts or novelizations of life in the camp were released while it was still operating. These include Drama di Boven Digoel by Kwee Tek Hoay,[42] serialized in the magazine Panorama from 1929–32 and published in book form in 1938; Darah dan aer-mata di Boven Digoel by Oen Bo Tik (1931), Antara idoep dan mati atawa Boeron dari Boven-Digoel by Wiranta (1931); Merah by Lim Khing Ho (1937); Siasat yang Dahsyat by Shamsuddin Saleh (1936); Boven-Digoel: Het land van communisten en kannibalen by L. J. A. Schoonheyt (1936); and Indonesia, een politiestaat by van Munster and former detainee Soekaesih.[43][44][45][46][47][48]
In the early independence era of Indonesia, a number of ex-Digoel detainees entered Indonesian politics. This included not only Hatta and Sjahrir, as mentioned above, but many Communist Party members who sat in the House of Representatives during the Sukarno era. An archive of materials about the camp was also set up at National Archives of Indonesia in Jakarta.[49] Books continued to be published about Digoel as well. The Indonesian novelist Pramoedya Ananta Toer, himself a political prisoner during the New Order era, was very interested in Boven-Digoel. He released a 2001 anthology of accounts of the camp titled Cerita dari Digul (Stories from Digul),[50] and the protagonist of his 1985 novel Footsteps experiences exile to the Eastern parts of the Indies as well. I. F. M. Salim, a former Digoel prisoner, also published his account in the Netherlands in 1973, Fifteen Years in Boven Digoel (Dutch: Vijftien jaar Boven-Digoel: concentratiekamp in Nieuw-Guinea: bakermat van de Indonesische onafhankelijkheid). It was published in Indonesian translation in 1977 as Limabelas tahun Digul: kamp konsentrasi di Nieuw Guinea, tempat persemaian kemerdekaan Indonesia.[51]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ a b c d e f g Shiraishi, Takashi (2021). The Phantom World of Digul: Policing as politics in Colonial Indonesia, 1926-1941. Singapore: NUS Press. pp. 29–35. ISBN 9784814003624.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v Cribb, Robert (2017). "Convict Exile and Penal Settlement in Colonial Indonesia". Journal of Colonialism and Colonial History. 18 (3). doi:10.1353/cch.2017.0043. ISSN 1532-5768.
- ^ a b Bruinsma, Gerben; Weisburd, David (2014). Encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justice. New York: Springer Reference. p. 1206. ISBN 978-1461456896.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Poeze, Harry A. (2012). "From Foe to Partner to Foe Again: The Strange Alliance of the Dutch Authorities and Digoel Exiles in Australia, 1943-1945". Indonesia. 94 (1): 57–84. doi:10.1353/ind.2012.a488361. ISSN 2164-8654.
- ^ Kousbroek, Rudy (22 March 1985). "In memoriam I. F. M. Salim". NRC Handelsblad (in Dutch). Rotterdam.
- ^ Mrázek, Rudolf (2020). The complete lives of camp people: colonialism, fascism, concentrated modernity. Durham: Duke University Press. p. 46. ISBN 9781478005773.
- ^ "In het Land der Groote Eenzaamheid. In het Ballingsoord aan den Boven-Digoel. Dr. Schoonheyt acht toestand interneeringsoord uitstekend. Maar Zeer Eenzaam". De Locomotief (in Dutch). Semarang. April 23, 1934.
- ^ a b Burgers, J. Herman (2010). De garoeda en de ooievaar: Indonesië van kolonie tot nationale staat. Leiden: KITLV uitg. pp. 202–3. ISBN 9789067183475.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Shiraishi, Takashi (2021). The Phantom World of Digul: Policing as politics in Colonial Indonesia, 1926-1941. Singapore: NUS Press. pp. 36–41. ISBN 9784814003624.
- ^ Mrázek, Rudolf (2020). The complete lives of camp people: colonialism, fascism, concentrated modernity. Durham London: Duke University Press. p. 14. ISBN 9781478005773.
- ^ "De aanvrage om overplaatsing van kapitein Becking". De nieuwe vorstenlanden (in Dutch). Surakarta. 13 October 1927. p. 2.
- ^ Mrázek, Rudolf (2020). The complete lives of camp people: colonialism, fascism, concentrated modernity. Durham: Duke University Press. p. 4. ISBN 9781478005773.
- ^ Mrázek, Rudolf (2020). The complete lives of camp people: colonialism, fascism, concentrated modernity. Durham London: Duke University Press. p. 153. ISBN 9781478005773.
- ^ a b c "Boven-Digoel, ons eigen concentratiekamp". Het vrije volk : democratisch-socialistisch dagblad (in Dutch). Rotterdam. 30 October 1973. p. 4.
- ^ "Boven Digoel". Bataviaasch nieuwsblad (in Dutch). Batavia. 14 December 1927. p. 1.
- ^ Mrázek, Rudolf (1 August 2016). "Lenin of the Camps: Radical Translation in Colonial Digoel and Nazi Terezín". boundary 2. 43 (3): 133–157. doi:10.1215/01903659-3572466.
- ^ Mrázek, Rudolf (2020). The complete lives of camp people: colonialism, fascism, concentrated modernity. Durham: Duke University Press. p. 2. ISBN 9781478005773.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Shiraishi, Takashi (2021). The Phantom World of Digul: Policing as politics in Colonial Indonesia, 1926-1941. Singapore: NUS Press. pp. 41–51. ISBN 9784814003624.
- ^ "Gevonden in Delpher - De Indische courant". De Indische Courant (in Dutch). 15 February 1927. Retrieved 2021-08-15.
- ^ Mrázek, Rudolf (2020). The complete lives of camp people: colonialism, fascism, concentrated modernity. Durham: Duke University Press. p. 18. ISBN 9781478005773.
- ^ Mrázek, Rudolf (2020). The complete lives of camp people: colonialism, fascism, concentrated modernity. Durham: Duke University Press. p. 51. ISBN 9781478005773.
- ^ "Oost-Indië. Het verbanningsoord aan den Boven Digoel". Nieuwe Rotterdamsche Courant (in Dutch). Rotterdam. 15 September 1928. p. 18.
- ^ Mrázek, Rudolf (2020). The complete lives of camp people: colonialism, fascism, concentrated modernity. Durham: Duke University Press. p. 106. ISBN 9781478005773.
- ^ "Terug van Digoel?". De locomotief (in Dutch). Semarang. 5 March 1929. p. 9.
- ^ "KOLONIEN De Chineesche balling in Boven-Digoel". Arnhemsche courant (in Dutch). 1929-05-07.
- ^ "Noodkreet uit Digoel". Deli courant (in Dutch). 1929-10-04.
- ^ Mrázek, Rudolf (2020). The complete lives of camp people : colonialism, fascism, concentrated modernity. Durham: Duke University Press. p. 146. ISBN 9781478007364.
- ^ Mrázek, Rudolf (2020). The complete lives of camp people: colonialism, fascism, concentrated modernity. Durham London: Duke University Press. pp. 64–5. ISBN 9781478005773.
- ^ "Digoel, vroeger en nu". De Indische courant (in Dutch). Surabaya. 1 March 1932. p. 1.
- ^ Maier, Hendrik M. J. (1997). [9067182176 We are playing relatives: Riau, the cradle of reality and hybridity]. KITLV. p. 359. ISBN 978-90-6718-217-1.
{{cite book}}
: Check|url=
value (help) - ^ Formichi, Chiara (2012). Islam and the making of the nation: Kartosuwiryo and political Islam in twentieth-century Indonesia. Leiden: KITLV Press. p. 54. ISBN 9789067183864.
- ^ Yamamoto, Nobuto (2019). Censorship in colonial Indonesia, 1901-1942. Leiden Boston: Brill. p. 215. ISBN 9789004362543.
- ^ Burgers, J. Herman (2010). De garoeda en de ooievaar: Indonesië van kolonie tot nationale staat. Leiden: KITLV uitg. p. 239. ISBN 9789067183475.
- ^ Gouda, Frances; Zaalberg, Thijs Brocades (2002). "American Visions of Colonial Indonesia from the Great Depression to the Growing Fear of Japan, 1930-1938". American Visions of the Netherlands East Indies/Indonesia. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. p. 93. ISBN 978-90-5356-479-0. JSTOR j.ctt45kf5g.10.
- ^ Mrázek, Rudolf (2013). "Healing in Digoel". Indonesia (95): 47–72. doi:10.5728/indonesia.95.0047. ISSN 0019-7289. JSTOR 10.5728/indonesia.95.0047.
- ^ "Ondergrondsche communistische actie in Indië de kop ingedrukt. Binnenkort nieuwe interneeringen." De Telegraaf. Amsterdam. March 24, 1938. p. 3.
- ^ "Naar Boven-Digoel Twaalf Communisten op de nominatie". Bataviaasch Nieuwsblad (in Dutch). Batavia. March 7, 1938. p. 2.
- ^ "Gegadigden voor Digoel. Twaalf Indische communisten staan op de nominatie". De Locomotief (in Dutch). Semarang. March 7, 1938.
- ^ Mrázek, Rudolf (2013). "Healing in Digoel". Indonesia (95): 57. doi:10.5728/indonesia.95.0047. ISSN 0019-7289. JSTOR 10.5728/indonesia.95.0047.
- ^ Mrázek, Rudolf (2020). The complete lives of camp people: colonialism, fascism, concentrated modernity. Durham London: Duke University Press. p. 331. ISBN 9781478005773.
- ^ Mrázek, Rudolf (2020). The complete lives of camp people: colonialism, fascism, concentrated modernity. Durham: Duke University Press. p. 313. ISBN 9781478005773.
- ^ Sugono, Dendy (2003). Ensiklopedia Sastra Indonesia Modern (in Indonesian). Pusat Bahasa. p. 162. ISBN 978-979-685-308-3.
- ^ Kwee, John B. (1980). "Kwee Tek Hoay: A Productive Chinese Writer of Java (1880-1952)". Archipel. 19 (1): 85–6. doi:10.3406/arch.1980.1526.
- ^ Liang, Li Ji (1987). "Sastra Peranakan Tionghoa dan Kehadirannya dalam Sastra Sunda". Archipel (in Indonesian). 34 (1): 167. doi:10.3406/arch.1987.2379.
- ^ Chambert-Loir, Henri (1976). "Les nationalistes indonésiens vus par un romancier malais: Shamsuddin Saleh". Archipel (in French). 12 (1): 152–6. doi:10.3406/arch.1976.1300.
- ^ Mrázek, Rudolf (2018). Sjahrir : Politics and Exile in Indonesia. Ithaca, NY. p. 133. ISBN 9781501718816.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - ^ Indonesia, een politiestaat. OCLC 63837712. Retrieved 31 October 2021 – via WorldCat.
- ^ Dekker, Elsbeth (April 2021). ""HUMANITY, LAW AND OBJECTS: INTRODUCTION: HUMANITY AND LAW, DEMOCRACY AND JUSTICE, ALSO FOR INDONESIA!"". Art Antiquity & Law. 26 (1).
- ^ Mrázek, Rudolf (2020). The complete lives of camp people: colonialism, fascism, concentrated modernity. Durham: Duke University Press. p. 5. ISBN 9781478005773.
- ^ Sugono, Dendy (2003). Ensiklopedia Sastra Indonesia Modern (in Indonesian). Pusat Bahasa. p. 212. ISBN 978-979-685-308-3.
- ^ Limabelas tahun Digul: kamp konsentrasi di Nieuw Guinea, tempat persemaian kemerdekaan Indonesia (in Indonesian). 1977. OCLC 48222792. Retrieved 1 September 2021 – via WorldCat.
Further reading
[edit]- Legge, John (1972). Sukarno: A Political Biography. London: Allen Lane. ISBN 0-7139-0244-2.
- Vickers, Adrian (2006). A History of Modern Indonesia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-54262-3. ISBN 978-1-107-01947-8 (second edition).