Jump to content

Mexican tetra

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Blind cave characin)
"Blind cave fish" redirects here. For cavefish in general, see cavefish.

Mexican tetra
Normal form (above) and blind cave form (below)

Vulnerable  (IUCN 2.3)[2] Cave form
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Actinopterygii
Order: Characiformes
Family: Characidae
Genus: Astyanax
Species:
A. mexicanus
Binomial name
Astyanax mexicanus
(De Filippi, 1853)
Approximate range
Synonyms[3]
  • Tetragonopterus mexicanus De Filippi, 1853
  • Astyanax fasciatus mexicanus (De Filippi, 1853)
  • Tetragonopterus fulgens Bocourt, 1868
  • Tetragonopterus nitidus Bocourt, 1868
  • Tetragonopterus streetsii Cope, 1872

The Mexican tetra (Astyanax mexicanus), also known as the blind cave fish, blind cave characin or the blind cave tetra, is a freshwater fish in the Characidae family (tetras and relatives) of the order Characiformes.[4][5] The type species of its genus, it is native to the Nearctic realm, originating in the lower Rio Grande, and the Neueces and Pecos Rivers in Texas, into the Central Plateau and eastern states of Mexico.[4][6][7]

Maturing at a total length of about 12 cm (4.7 in), the Mexican tetra is of typical characin form, albeit with silvery, unremarkable scalation, likely an evolutionary adaptation to its natural environment.[4] By comparison, the species' blind "cave" form has scales which evolved a pale, pinkish-white color, somewhat resembling an albino,[8] as it inhabits pitch-black caverns and subterranean streams and has no need for a colorful appearance (i.e. for attracting mates).

Likewise, the blind cave tetra has fully "devolved" (lost) the use of its eyes by living in an environment completely devoid of natural light, with only empty sockets in their place. The blind tetra instead has sensory organs along its body, as well as a heightened nervous system (and senses of smell and touch), and can immediately detect where objects or other animals are located by slight changes in the surrounding water pressure, a process vaguely similar to echolocation—another adaptation known from cave-dwelling, as well as aquatic, species, such as the bats and cetaceans.

The Mexican tetra's blind variant has experienced a steady surge in popularity among modern aquarists.[9]

A. mexicanus is a peaceful, sociable schooling species, like most tetras, that spends most of its time in midlevel waters above the rocky and sandy bottoms of pools, and backwaters of creeks and streams. Coming from an environment somewhere between subtropical climate, it prefers water with 6.5–8 pH, a hardness of up to 30 dGH, and a temperature range of 20 to 25 °C (68 to 77 °F). In the winter, some populations migrate to warmer waters. The species' natural diet consists largely of crustaceans, annelids and arthropods and their larvae, including both aquatic insects, such as water beetles, and those that land on or fall in the water, like flies or arachnids. It will also supplement its diet with algae or aquatic vegetation; in captivity, it is largely omnivorous, often doing well on a variety of foods such as frozen/thawed or live cultured blackworms, bloodworms, brine shrimp, daphnia, and mysis shrimp, among other commercially available fish foods.[4][9]

The Mexican tetra has been treated as a subspecies of A. fasciatus, though this is not widely accepted.[4] Additionally, the hypogean blind cave form is sometimes recognized as a separate species, A. jordani, but this directly contradicts the phylogenetic evidence.[8][10][11][12][13][14]

Blind cave form

[edit]
Blind cave fish form

A. mexicanus is famous for its blind cave form, which is known by such names as blind cave tetra, blind tetra (leading to easy confusion with the Brazilian Stygichthys typhlops), blind cave characin and blind cavefish. Depending on the exact population, cave forms can have degenerated sight or have total loss of sight and even their eyes, due to down-regulation of the protein αA-crystallin and consequent lens cell death.[15] Despite losing their eyes, cavefish cells respond to light responsive and show an endogenous circadian rhythm.[16] During the start of development, larvae still exhibit a shadow response which is controlled by the pineal eye.[17] The fish in the Pachón caves have lost their eyes completely whilst the fish from the Micos cave only have limited sight.[18] Cave fish and surface fish are able to produce fertile offspring.[18]

These fish can still, however, find their way around by means of their lateral lines, which are highly sensitive to fluctuating water pressure.[19] Blindness in A. mexicanus induces a disruption of early neuromast patterning, which further causes asymmetries in cranial bone structure. One such asymmetry is a bend in the dorsal region of their skull, which is propounded to increase water flow to the opposite side of the face, functionally enhancing sensory input and spatial mapping in the dark waters of caves.[20] Scientists suggest that gene cystathionine beta synthase-a mutation restricts blood flow to cavefish eyes during a critical stage of growth so the eyes are covered by skin.[21]

Currently, about 30 cave populations are known, dispersed over three geographically distinct areas in a karst region of San Luis Potosí and far southern Tamaulipas, northeastern Mexico.[10][22][23] Among the various cave population are at least three with only full cave forms (blind and without pigment), at least eleven with cave, "normal" and intermediate forms, and at least one with both cave and "normal" forms but no intermediates.[22] Studies suggest at least two distinct genetic lineages occur among the blind populations, and the current distribution of populations arose by at least five independent invasions.[10][24] Furthermore, cave populations have a very recent origin (< 20,000 years) in which blindness or reduced vision evolved convergently after surface ancestors populated several caves independently at different times.[25][26] This recent origin suggests that the phenotypic changes in cavefish populations, namely eye degeneration, arose as a result of the high fixation of genetic variants present in surface fish populations in a short period of time.[27]

The eyed and eyeless forms of A. mexicanus, being members of the same species, are closely related and can interbreed[28] making this species an excellent model organism for examining convergent and parallel evolution, regressive evolution in cave animals, and the genetic basis of regressive traits.[29] This, combined with the ease of maintaining the species in captivity, has made it the most studied cavefish and likely also the most studied cave organism overall.[22]

The blind and colorless cave form of A. mexicanus is sometimes recognized as a separate species, A. jordani, but this leaves the remaining A. mexicanus as a paraphyletic species and A. jordani as polyphyletic.[8][10][11][12][13][14] The Cueva Chica Cave in the southern part of the Sierra del Abra system is the type locality for A. jordani.[8] Other blind populations were initially also recognized as separate species, including antrobius described in 1946 from the Pachón Cave and hubbsi described in 1947 from the Los Sabinos Cave (both subsequently merged into jordani/mexicanus).[8] The most divergent cave population is the one in Los Sabinos.[8][30]

Another cave-adapted population of Astyanax, varying from blind and depigmented to individuals showing intermediate features, is known from the Granadas Cave, part of the Balsas River drainage in Guerrero, southern Mexico, but it is a part of A. aeneus (itself sometimes included in A. mexicanus).[8][23][31]

Evolution research

[edit]

The surface and cave forms of the Mexican tetra have proven powerful subjects for scientists studying evolution.[28] When the surface-dwelling ancestors of current cave populations entered the subterranean environment, the change in ecological conditions rendered their phenotype—which included many biological functions dependent on the presence of light—subject to natural selection and genetic drift.[29][32] One of the most striking changes to evolve was the loss of eyes. This is referred to as a "regressive trait" because the surface fish that originally colonized caves possessed eyes.[28] In addition to regressive traits, cave forms evolved "constructive traits". In contrast to regressive traits, the purpose or benefit of constructive traits is generally accepted.[29] Active research focuses on the mechanisms driving the evolution of regressive traits, such as the loss of eyes, in A. mexicanus. Recent studies have produced evidence that the mechanism may be direct selection,[33][34] or indirect selection through antagonistic pleiotropy,[35] rather than genetic drift and neutral mutation, the traditionally favored hypothesis for regressive evolution.[32]

Pleiotropy is hypothesized to be important in cave fish because there are genes that might be selected for one trait and automatically cause another trait to be selected for it if it is governed by the same gene.[36] As selective pressure on one trait can coordinate change in others, pleiotropy could explain why independent adaptation to the cave environment has been observed in multiple populations of the species.[37] One example is the relationship between taste bud amplification and eye loss controlled by sonic hedgehog expression (Shh) in cave fish.[38] It has been shown that with an over expression of Shh there is an increased number of taste buds and reduced eye development.[38] It is hypothesized that since caves are food and nutrient limited, having an increased amount of taste buds is important and may be under strong selection while at the same time causing evolution of eye loss.[38]

The blind form of the Mexican tetra is different from the surface-dwelling form in a number of ways, including having unpigmented skin, having a better olfactory sense by having taste buds all over its head, and by being able to store four times more energy as fat, allowing it to deal with irregular food supplies more effectively.[39]

Darwin said of sightless fish:[40]

By the time that an animal had reached, after numberless generations, the deepest recesses, disuse will on this view have more or less perfectly obliterated its eyes, and natural selection will often have effected other changes, such as an increase in the length of antennae or palpi, as compensation for blindness.

— Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species (1859)

Modern genetics has made clear that the lack of use does not, in itself, necessitate a feature's disappearance.[41][42] In this context, the positive genetic benefits have to be considered, i.e., what advantages are obtained by cave-dwelling tetras by losing their eyes? Possible explanations include:

  • Not developing eyes allows the individual more energy for growth but not egg production.[15] However the species does use other methods to locate food and detect danger, which also consume energy that would be conserved if it had eyes or transparent eyelids.
  • There remains less chance of accidental damage and infection, since the previously useless and exposed organ is sealed with a flap of protective skin. It is unknown why this species did not develop transparent skin or eyelids instead, as some species of reptiles did.
  • The lack of eyes disables the "body clock", which is controlled by periods of light and dark, conserving energy. However sunlight does have minimal impact on the "body clock" in caves.[citation needed]

It is important to note that even if natural selection is positively acting to reduce eye growth drift is still present.[36]

Another likely explanation for the loss of its eyes is that of selective neutrality and genetic drift; in the dark environment of the cave, the eyes are neither advantageous nor disadvantageous and thus any genetic factors that might impair the eyes (or their development) can take hold with no consequence on the individual or species. Because there is no selection pressure for sight in this environment, any number of genetic abnormalities that give rise to the damage or loss of eyes could proliferate among the population with no effect on the fitness of the population.

Among some creationists, the cave tetra is seen as evidence 'against' evolution. One argument claims this is an instance of "devolution"—showing an evolutionary trend of decreasing complexity. But evolution is a non-directional process, and while increased complexity is a common effect, there is no reason why evolution cannot tend towards simplicity if that makes an organism better suited to its environment.[43]

Inhibition of the HSP90 protein has a dramatic effect in the development of the blind tetra.[44]

In the aquarium

[edit]

The blind cave tetras seen in the aquarium trade are all based on stock collected in the Cueva Chica Cave in the southern part of the Sierra del Abra system in 1936.[8] These were sent to an aquarium company in Texas, who soon started to distribute them to aquarists. Since then, these have been selectively bred for their troglomorphic traits.[8] Today large numbers are bred at commercial facilities, especially in Asia.[9]

The blind cave tetra is a hardy species.[8] Their lack of sight does not hinder their ability to get food. They prefer subdued lighting with a rocky substrate, like gravel, mimicking their natural environment. They become semi-aggressive as they age, and are by nature schooling fish.[45] Experiments have shown that keeping these fish in bright aquarium set-ups has no effect on the development of the skin flap that forms over their eyes as they grow.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ NatureServe (2013). "Astyanax mexicanus". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2013: e.T62191A3109229. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2013-1.RLTS.T62191A3109229.en.
  2. ^ Contreras-Balderas, S. & Almada-Villela, P. (1996). "Astyanax mexicanus ssp. jordani". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 1996: e.T2270A9379535. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.1996.RLTS.T2270A9379535.en. Retrieved 2 July 2023.
  3. ^ Froese, R.; Reyes, R. D. (2023-04-21). Froese, R.; Pauly, D. (eds.). "Synonyms of Astyanax mexicanus (De Filippi, 1853)". FishBase. Retrieved 2023-04-21.
  4. ^ a b c d e Froese, Rainer; Pauly, Daniel (eds.). "Astyanax mexicanus". FishBase. October 2015 version.
  5. ^ "Astyanax mexicanus". Integrated Taxonomic Information System. Retrieved 1 July 2006.
  6. ^ Borowsky, Richard (2018-01-22). "Cavefishes". Current Biology. 28 (2): R60–R64. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2017.12.011. ISSN 1879-0445. PMID 29374443. S2CID 235332375.
  7. ^ Palermo,LiveScience, Elizabeth. "Blind Cavefish Stops Its Internal Clock". Scientific American. Retrieved 2022-02-24.
  8. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Keene, A.; Yoshizawa, M.; McGaugh, S. (2016). Biology and Evolution of the Mexican Cavefish. Elsevier Science. pp. 68–69, 77–87. ISBN 978-0-12-802148-4.
  9. ^ a b c "Astyanax mexicanus". Seriously Fish. Retrieved 2 May 2017.
  10. ^ a b c d Gross, J.B. (June 2012). "The complex origin of Astyanax cave fish". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 12: 105. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-12-105. PMC 3464594. PMID 22747496.
  11. ^ a b Jeffery, W. (2009). "Regressive evolution in Astyanax cavefish". Annual Review of Genetics. 43: 25–47. doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-102108-134216. PMC 3594788. PMID 19640230.
  12. ^ a b Bradic, M.; Beerli, P.; Garcia-de Leon, F. J.; Esquivel-Bobadilla, S.; Borowsky, R. L. (2012). "Gene flow and population structure in the Mexican blind cavefish complex (Astyanax mexicanus)". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 12: 9. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-12-9. PMC 3282648. PMID 22269119.
  13. ^ a b Dowling, T. E.; Martasian, D. P.; Jeffery, W. R. (2002). "Evidence for multiple genetic forms with similar eyeless phenotypes in the blind cavefish, Astyanax mexicanus". Molecular Biology and Evolution. 19 (4). Oxford University Press (OUP) (Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution (smbe)): 446–455. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004100. PMID 11919286.
  14. ^ a b Strecker, U.; Faúndez, V. H.; Wilkens, H. (2004). "Phylogeography of surface and cave Astyanax (Teleostei) from Central and North America based on cytochrome b sequence data". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 33 (2). Academic Press: 469–481. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2004.07.001. PMID 15336680.
  15. ^ a b Jeffery, W. R. (2005-01-13). "Adaptive Evolution of Eye Degeneration in the Mexican Blind Cavefish". Journal of Heredity. 96 (3): 185–196. doi:10.1093/jhered/esi028. ISSN 1465-7333. PMID 15653557.
  16. ^ Frøland Steindal, Inga A.; Yamamoto, Yoshiyuki; Whitmore, David (2023-07-12). "Blind fish have cells that see light". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 290 (2002). doi:10.1098/rspb.2023.0981. ISSN 0962-8452. PMC 10336380. PMID 37434525.
  17. ^ Yoshizawa, Masato; Jeffery, William R. (2008-02-01). "Shadow response in the blind cavefishAstyanaxreveals conservation of a functional pineal eye". Journal of Experimental Biology. 211 (3): 292–299. doi:10.1242/jeb.012864. ISSN 1477-9145. PMC 3584714. PMID 18203983.
  18. ^ a b Moran, D.; Softley, R. & Warrant, E. J. (2015). "The energetic cost of vision and the evolution of eyeless Mexican cavefish". Science Advances. 1 (8): e1500363. Bibcode:2015SciA....1E0363M. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1500363. PMC 4643782. PMID 26601263.
  19. ^ Yoshizawa, M.; Yamamoto, Y.; O'Quin, K. E.; Jeffery, W. R. (December 2012). "Evolution of an adaptive behavior and its sensory receptors promotes eye regression in blind cavefish". BMC Biology. 10: 108. doi:10.1186/1741-7007-10-108. PMC 3565949. PMID 23270452.
  20. ^ Powers, Amanda K.; Berning, Daniel J.; Gross, Joshua B. (2020-02-06). "Parallel evolution of regressive and constructive craniofacial traits across distinct populations of Astyanax mexicanus cavefish". Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution. 334 (7–8): 450–462. Bibcode:2020JEZB..334..450P. doi:10.1002/jez.b.22932. ISSN 1552-5007. PMC 7415521. PMID 32030873.
  21. ^ "Gene found that causes eyes to wither in cavefish". phys.org. Retrieved 2020-06-27.
  22. ^ a b c Romero, A. (2009). Cave Biology: Life in Darkness. Cambridge University Press. pp. 147–148. ISBN 978-0-521-82846-8.
  23. ^ a b Luis Espinasa; Patricia Rivas-Manzano; Héctor Espinosa Pérez (2001). "A New Blind Cave Fish Population of Genus Astyanax: Geography, Morphology and Behavior". Environmental Biology of Fishes. 62 (1): 339–344. doi:10.1023/A:1011852603162. S2CID 30720408.
  24. ^ Moran, Rachel L.; Richards, Emilie J.; Ornelas-García, Claudia Patricia; Gross, Joshua B.; Donny, Alexandra; Wiese, Jonathan; Keene, Alex C.; Kowalko, Johanna E.; Rohner, Nicolas (2022-11-28). "Selection-driven trait loss in independently evolved cavefish populations". doi:10.1101/2022.11.28.518185. Retrieved 2024-11-16.
  25. ^ Fumey, Julien; Hinaux, Hélène; Noirot, Céline; Thermes, Claude; Rétaux, Sylvie; Casane, Didier (2018-04-18). "Evidence for late Pleistocene origin of Astyanax mexicanus cavefish". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 18 (1): 43. doi:10.1186/s12862-018-1156-7. ISSN 1471-2148. PMC 5905186. PMID 29665771.
  26. ^ WILKENS, HORST; STRECKER, ULRIKE (2003-12-01). "Convergent evolution of the cavefish Astyanax (Characidae, Teleostei): genetic evidence from reduced eye-size and pigmentation". Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 80 (4): 545–554. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2003.00230.x. ISSN 0024-4066.
  27. ^ Fumey, Julien; Hinaux, Hélène; Noirot, Céline; Thermes, Claude; Rétaux, Sylvie; Casane, Didier (2016-12-16). "Evidence for Late Pleistocene origin of Astyanax mexicanus cavefish". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 18 (1): 43. bioRxiv 10.1101/094748. doi:10.1186/s12862-018-1156-7. PMC 5905186. PMID 29665771.
  28. ^ a b c Retaux, S.; Casane, D. (September 2013). "Evolution of eye development in the darkness of caves: adaptation, drift, or both?". Evodevo. 4 (1): 26. doi:10.1186/2041-9139-4-26. PMC 3849642. PMID 24079393.
  29. ^ a b c Soares, D.; Niemiller, M. L. (April 2013). "Sensory Adaptations of Fishes to Subterranean Environments". BioScience. 63 (4): 274–283. doi:10.1525/bio.2013.63.4.7.
  30. ^ Lyndon M. Coghill; C. Darrin Hulsey; Johel Chaves-Campos; Francisco J. García de Leon; Steven G. Johnson (2014). "Next Generation Phylogeography of Cave and Surface Astyanax mexicanus". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 79: 368–374. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2014.06.029. PMID 25014568.
  31. ^ William R. Jeffery; Allen G. Strickler; Yoshiyuki Yamamoto (2003). "To See or Not to See: Evolution of Eye Degeneration in Mexican Blind Cavefish". Integrative and Comparative Biology. 43 (4). Oxford University Press (OUP) (Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology): 531–541. doi:10.1093/icb/43.4.531. PMID 21680461.
  32. ^ a b Wilkens, H (November 2012). "Genes, modules and the evolution of cave fish". Heredity. 105 (5): 413–422. doi:10.1038/hdy.2009.184. PMID 20068586.
  33. ^ Protas, M; Tabansky, I.; Conrad, M.; Gross, J. B.; Vidal, O.; Tabin, C. J.; Borowsky, R. (April 2008). "Multi-trait evolution in a cave fish, Astyanax mexicanus". Evolution & Development. 10 (2): 196–209. doi:10.1111/j.1525-142x.2008.00227.x. PMID 18315813. S2CID 32525015.
  34. ^ Cartwright, Reed A.; Schwartz, Rachel S.; Merry, Alexandra L.; Howell, Megan M. (2017-02-07). "The importance of selection in the evolution of blindness in cavefish". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 17 (1): 45. doi:10.1186/s12862-017-0876-4. ISSN 1471-2148. PMC 5297207. PMID 28173751.
  35. ^ Jeffery, WR (2009). "Regressive Evolution in Astyanax Cavefish". Annual Review of Genetics. 43: 25–47. doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-102108-134216. PMC 3594788. PMID 19640230.
  36. ^ a b Swaminathan, Amruta; Xia, Fanning; Rohner, Nicolas (January 2024). "From darkness to discovery: evolutionary, adaptive, and translational genetic insights from cavefish". Trends in Genetics. 40 (1): 24–38. doi:10.1016/j.tig.2023.10.002. ISSN 0168-9525.
  37. ^ Wiese, Jonathan; Richards, Emilie; Kowalko, Johanna E; McGaugh, Suzanne E (2024-07-30). "Quantitative trait loci concentrate in specific regions of the Mexican cavefish genome and reveal key candidate genes for cave-associated evolution". Journal of Heredity. doi:10.1093/jhered/esae040. ISSN 0022-1503. PMID 39079020.
  38. ^ a b c Yamamoto, Yoshiyuki; Byerly, Mardi S.; Jackman, William R.; Jeffery, William R. (June 2009). "Pleiotropic functions of embryonic sonic hedgehog expression link jaw and taste bud amplification with eye loss during cavefish evolution". Developmental Biology. 330 (1): 200–211. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.03.003. ISSN 0012-1606. PMC 3592972. PMID 19285488.
  39. ^ Helfman, G. S.; Collete, B. B.; Facey, D. E. (1997). The Diversity of Fishes. Malden, Massachusetts, USA: Blackwell Science. p. 315. ISBN 0-86542-256-7.
  40. ^ Darwin, Charles R. (2001) [As published 1909–1914, originally published 1859]. "Chapter 5: Laws of Variation, Effects of the Increased Use and Disuse of Parts, as Controlled by Natural Selection". In Eliot, Charles W. (ed.). The Origin of Species. The Harvard Classics. Vol. XI. New York: P.F. Collier and Son. Retrieved 8 February 2024 – via Bartleby.com.
  41. ^ Espinasa, L.; Espinasa, M. (June 2005). "Why do cave fish lose their eyes? A Darwinian mystery unfolds in the dark". FindArticles. Archived from the original on 2006-05-15. Retrieved 2007-02-13.
  42. ^ Espinasa, M.; Espinasa, L. (2008). "Losing Sight of Regressive Evolution". Evolution: Education and Outreach. 1 (S4): 509–516. doi:10.1007/s12052-008-0094-z.
  43. ^ Dawkins, R. (1997). Climbing Mount Improbable. New York: W. W. Norton. ISBN 0-393-31682-3.
  44. ^ Rohner, N.; Jarosz, D. F.; Kowalko, J. E.; Yoshizawa, M.; Jeffery, W. R.; Borowsky, R. L.; Lindquist, S.; Tabin, C. J. (2013). "Cryptic variation in morphological evolution: HSP90 as a capacitor for loss of eyes in cavefish". Science. 342 (6164): 1372–1375. Bibcode:2013Sci...342.1372R. doi:10.1126/science.1240276. hdl:1721.1/96714. PMC 4004346. PMID 24337296.
  45. ^ "Mexican Tetra (Astyanax mexicanus): Ultimate Care Guide". Fish Laboratory. August 5, 2022. Retrieved August 5, 2022.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mexican_tetra&oldid=1257819681"