Nightfire Island
| Nightfire Island (Sheepy Island) | |
|---|---|
| Native names | |
| Archeological Site 4-SK-4 | |
| Nearest city | Dorris, California |
| Coordinates | 41°58′24″N 121°48′56″W / 41.97338943°N 121.8155°W |
| Area | 2.5 acres (1.0 ha) |
Archeological Site 4-SK-4, nearest to Dorris, California, is a stratified archeological site that was a hunter-gatherer village west of Lower Klamath Lake.[1] The site is located in the heart of the Klamath Basin wetlands, on the west shores of Sheepy Lake at Sheepy Creek.[2] It has also been known as Nightfire Island and as Sheepy Island.[3] Modern Modocs have called the island Shapasheni (Shapash /xpni), meaning "where the sun and moon live", or "home of the sun and the moon.[2][4][5]
Prehistorically, it served as a village camp on a man-made mound in the wetlands and as a ceremonial site.[6] The site shows evidence of human occupancy from the peak of the Hypsithermal era, approximately 7,000 years ago.[7] Archeologist have unearthed three villages one on top of the other through the centuries.[8] Obsidian arrowheads are frequent finds, whose varieties include Northern Sided Notched, Elko type corner notched, and Gunther type points.[9]
Excavations and sampling started in 1966 by Klamath educator Carrol Howe. The site was described by Garth Sampson in a 1985 publication of the University of Oregon.[2]
History
[edit]Human occupation of the Klamath Basin areas may have begun around 6000 BCE.[2] Settlement by Modoc people on the banks of Sheepy Creek is likely to have begun approximately 4000 years BCE,[10] shortly after the eruption of Mount Mazama, as evidenced by a layer of volcanic ash on the lake bed just below the layer that marks the appearance of a new village.[6]
The shallow water level of the marsh, the clay loam, and the basalt rubble basin extended all around and over this area afforded only a weak foundation for settlement. To compensate, inhabitants carried in rocks to strengthen the village's foundation. After centuries of this procedure, they had built an island of an area approximately 2.5 acres (1.0 ha).
Surrounded by marshlands, the villagers could fish and hunt waterfowl.[11] The springs nearest to Nightfire Island are geothermal waters, adding to the comfort of the villagers. During the dry months, the receding water levels allowed for the establishment of a secure hunting station. Charcoal remains show evidence of cooking pits and cremated burial sites within the island. Bones show an early abundance of duck with additional diversity appearing in later years.[2]
Waterfowl droppings within layers of the excavation site show that there were times where the site was abandoned for several hundred years, probably because of the rising of the levels of Indian Tom Lake, climate change during the hot and dry middle Holocene, or changes in the Keno fault.[10] When water levels receded, occupation resumed with the appearance of black charcoal levels from cooking and cremation fires.[6]
The environment that Nightfire's inhabitants would have known ceased to exist when the Southern Pacific Railway built a railway embankment along the downstream edge of Lower Klamath Lake, they put in a drainage conduit that unintentionally emptied most of the lake. The tule marshes that made Nightfire an island have been gone, replaced by pastures and farm fields.[2]
Archeology
[edit]Excavations of archeological site 4-SK-4 have produced large collections of bird, mammal, and fish bones, large amounts of obsidian technology (particularly Elko points), bone artifacts, mortars and other stone artifacts as well as other cultural detritus.[10][4] These occupational debris reach a maximum of 3 meters deep. The lower stratum is lacustrine, waterway diatom-rich silt from the original lake floor present during the first occupation of the site. From there, the strata consist of a series of silt, streamland and loam forming a duripan horizon.[12]
Villagers cooked small animals by boiling them in baskets, while larger animals were cooked in rock roasting ovens primarily composed of large basalt rocks. Along with oven rocks, other rocks included broken fragments of mortar and pestles and banded stones used for weights. Banded rocks are generally used for outdoor support such as tying down canoes.[13] On Nightfire Island, banded rocks may have been used for indoor weights since they were found inside the houses and in roasting pits.[14] The number of these rocks and their weight exceeds the traditional canoe weights and even the weights used by the Modoc people for the balsa-type rafts. The banded rocks from Nightfire Island show signs of burning mixed with charcoal from cooking fires.[15] Some stones were used for boiling food in basketry by placing the hot basalt or lava stones into tightly packed woven water-filled baskets.[16]
The presence of buffalo hide on Nightfire Island suggest the village hunters used obsidian and spear-throwers. The most common arrow point found on the site is the Cascade-type. Additionally, the excavation has produced several pressure-flaking tools made of bone and antler used for projectiles, especially before the bow and arrow were in use.[17] Stone anvils from the excavation had single and bilateral worn out pits used for knapping the obsidian to break the spalls from the rock.[18] The large amount of anvils found on Nightfire Island suggest they were used for other purposes than knapping, including cracking bones. The side pits are not worn out consistent with the use as a maul or for pounding food.[17]
While Modocs of the Great Basin had chipped-stone crescents or lunates,[19][20] their presence has not been confirmed on Nightfire Island. Some smaller versions have been excavated but they are of a different shape and material.[21] An increase in small, stemmed and corner notched arrowheads have been discovered on layers of approximately 2,500 years BCE which corresponds to the peak in the dabbling duck remains and the adoption of the bow and arrow.
Culture
[edit]Excavations have unearthed structures that suggest buildings similar to sweat lodges on Nightfire Island. Carbon-14 dated to approximately 1,500 years ago, these would be the oldest remains of a sweat lodge.[4]
A higher than usual frequency of neuronal malformations in remains discovered within Nightfire Island suggest tentatively that inbreeding might have occurred.[22] Studies of skeletal remains also revealed an unusually large and deep fossae lateral in the 1st and 2nd sacral tuberosities, suggesting a very strong postural ligament attachment.[23]
Nightfire Modocs were prominent waterfowl hunters. While rainfall was not consistent, the alkali open marshes held in place by block-fault ridges provided a rich habitat for local and migratory waterfowl. In the Fall pintails and mallards arrived first along the Pacific Flyway[24] and later in the season baldpates and canvasbacks.[25] Coot and the common merganser were common as overwinter birds.[26] On the northern direction, white snow geese arrived first and white fronted geese were among the latest to fly by. Nightfire Island soils didn't contain egg shells,[27] however residents took advantage of bird-nesting season for the stability of their life cycle.
Zooarchaeology
[edit]Analysis of samples from Nightfire Island show that residents ate a great variety of birds: Podiceps spp., Cygnus spp., Branta spp., Anas spp., Aythya spp., Bucephala spp., and Mergus spp.[28] Additionally, bones of eagles, owls and raven were also found among the kitchen midden.[10] Deeper levels of the marshy lake allowed for a higher quantity of waterfowl during the CE.
The bird life of Nightfire Island includes the following species dated by radiocarbon determinations:[10]
References
[edit]- ^ Federal Register, The Daily Journal of the United States Government (February 2, 2009). "Notice of Inventory Completion: University of Oregon, Oregon State Museum of Anthropology, Eugene, OR". Retrieved April 10, 2020.
- ^ a b c d e f Sampson, C. Garth (1985). "Nightfire Island: Later holocene lakemarsh adaptation on the western edge of the great basin" (PDF). Geoarcheology. 2: 247. Retrieved April 5, 2020.
- ^ Hughes, R E (1986). Diachronic variability in obsidian procurement patterns in northeastern California and southcentral Oregon. Univ of California Press. ISBN 9780520096998.
- ^ a b c Murguía, Alejandro (2002). The Medicine of Memory: A Mexica Clan in California. University of Texas Press. pp. 154–155. ISBN 0292778708.
- ^ Doty, Thomas (2002). Doty Meets Coyote. Blackstone Publishing. ISBN 1504708334.
- ^ a b c Howe, 8-9
- ^ Johnson, L. (1969). Obsidian hydration rate for the Klamath Basin of California and Oregon. Science, 165(3900), 1354-1356.
- ^ Kittredge, William (2000). Balancing Water: Restoring the Klamath Basin. University of California Press. p. 167. ISBN 0520213149.
- ^ Justice, N. D. (2002). Stone Age spear and arrow points of California and the Great Basin Indiana University Press. Page 174
- ^ a b c d e Grayson, D. K. (1976). A note on the prehistoric avifauna of the Lower Klamath Basin. The Auk, 93(4), 830-833.
- ^ Kittredge, W. (2000). Balancing water: restoring the Klamath Basin. Univ of California Press. Page 176
- ^ USDA Soil Series Descriptions and Series Classification (August 2004). "Modoc Series". Retrieved April 14, 2020.
- ^ Carlisle, Rodney P. (2007). Native America from Prehistory to First Contact. ABC-CLIO. p. 177. ISBN 978-1851098293.
- ^ Howe, p. 64
- ^ Howe, p. 67
- ^ The Library of Native Americans (2003). The Modoc of California and Oregon. The Rosen Publishing Group. p. 19. ISBN 1404226605.
- ^ a b Howe, p. 72
- ^ Hranicky, Wm Jack (2013). Archaeological Concepts, Techniques, and Terminology for American Prehistoric Lithic Technology. AuthorHouse. pp. 82, 277. ISBN 978-1481751742.
- ^ Justice, Noel D. (2002). Stone Age Spear and Arrow Points of California and the Great Basin. Indiana University Press. p. 116. ISBN 0253108837.
- ^ University of California Archaeological Survey, & Berkeley. Archaeological Research Facility. (1960). Reports of the University of California Archaeological Survey. University of California Archaeological Survey, Department of Anthropology, University of California. p. 44.
- ^ Howe, p. 33
- ^ Bennett, K. A. (1972). Lumbo‐sacral malformations and spina bifida occulta in a group of proto‐historic Modoc Indians. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 36(3), 435-439.
- ^ de la Mata, R. C., & Bonavia, D. (1980). Lumbosacral malformations and spina bifida in a Peruvian preceramic child. Current Anthropology, 21(4), 515-516.
- ^ Seattle Audubon Society (February 2, 2009). "Northern Pintail". Retrieved April 14, 2020.
- ^ "American Wigeon". Ducks Unlimited. Retrieved April 14, 2020.
- ^ Vequist, Gary (21 Dec 2018). "Common mergansers: The piscivorous divers". Herald and News. Retrieved April 14, 2020.
- ^ Howe, p. 36-37
- ^ Howe, p. 40
Bibliography
[edit]- Howe, Carrol B (1979). Ancient Modocs of California and Oregon. Binford & Mort. ISBN 9780832303371.