Jump to content

American Spinal Injury Association

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from 10.46292)
Muscle strength score[1]
Grade Muscle function
0 No muscle contraction
1 Muscle flickers
2 Full range of motion with gravity eliminated
3 Full range of motion against gravity
4 Full range of motion against resistance
5 Normal strength

The American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA), formed in 1973,[2] publishes the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI),[3] which is a neurological exam widely used to document sensory and motor impairments following spinal cord injury (SCI).[4] The ASIA assessment is the gold standard for assessing SCI.[5] ASIA is one of the affiliated societies of the International Spinal Cord Society.[6]

The exam is based on neurological responses, touch and pinprick sensations tested in each dermatome, and strength of the muscles that control key motions on both sides of the body.[7] Muscle strength is scored on a scale of 0–5 according to the adjacent table, and sensation is graded on a scale of 0–2: 0 is no sensation, 1 is altered or decreased sensation, and 2 is full sensation.[8] Each side of the body is graded independently.[8] When an area is not available (e.g. because of an amputation or cast), it is recorded as "NT", "not testable".[3] The ISNCSCI exam is used for determining the neurological level of injury (the lowest area of full, uninterrupted sensation and function).[3]

The completeness or incompleteness of the injury is measured by the ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS).

ASIA Impairment Scale for classifying spinal cord injury[7][9]
Grade Description
A Complete injury. No motor or sensory function is preserved in the sacral segments S4 or S5.
B Sensory incomplete. Sensory but not motor function is preserved below the level of injury, including the sacral segments.
C Motor incomplete. Motor function is preserved below the level of injury, and more than half of muscles tested below the level of injury have a muscle grade less than 3 (see muscle strength scores table).
D Motor incomplete. Motor function is preserved below the level of injury and at least half of the key muscles below the neurological level have a muscle grade of 3 or more.
E Normal. No motor or sensory deficits, but deficits existed in the past.

History

[edit]

Until the development of the Frankel grade classification (FGC) in 1969, there was no universally accepted grading system for SCI. Frankel and his team developed a classification system with five grades, labeled A through E, to assess the severity of neurological impairments following a traumatic SCI.[10]

In 1982, the Standards Committee of ASIA revised and published the first edition of the "Standards for Neurologic Classification of Spinal Cord Injury," based on the modified version of the FGC.[10]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Harvey 2008, p. 7.
  2. ^ "ASIA | History". Archived from the original on 2016-01-23. Retrieved 2016-01-05.
  3. ^ a b c Kirshblum, Steven C.; Burns, Stephen P.; Biering-Sorensen, Fin; Donovan, William; Graves, Daniel E.; Jha, Amitabh; Johansen, Mark; Jones, Linda; Krassioukov, Andrei; Mulcahey, M.J.; Schmidt-Read, Mary; Waring, William (2011). "International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (Revised 2011)". The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine. 34 (6): 535–546. doi:10.1179/204577211X13207446293695. ISSN 1079-0268. PMC 3232636. PMID 22330108.
  4. ^ Marino, R.J.; Barros, T.; Biering-Sorensen, F.; Burns, S.P.; Donovan, W.H.; Graves, D.E.; Haak, M.; Hudson, L.M.; Priebe, M.M.; ASIA Neurological Standards Committee 2002 (2003). "International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury". The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine. 26 Suppl 1: S50–56. doi:10.1080/10790268.2003.11754575. PMID 16296564. S2CID 12799339.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  5. ^ Dimitrijevic et al. 2012, p. 12.
  6. ^ Affiliated Societies 13.04.2011
  7. ^ a b "Standard Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury" (PDF). American Spinal Injury Association & ISCOS. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 18, 2011. Retrieved 5 November 2015.
  8. ^ a b Weiss 2010, p. 307.
  9. ^ Teufack, Harrop & Ashwini 2012, p. 67.
  10. ^ a b Kirshblum, Steven; Botticello, Amanda; Benedetto, John; Donovan, Jayne; Marino, Ralph; Hsieh, Shelly; Wagaman, Nicole (2020-06-09). "A Comparison of Diagnostic Stability of the ASIA Impairment Scale Versus Frankel Classification Systems for Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury". Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 101 (9): 1556–1562. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2020.05.016.

Bibliography

[edit]
[edit]