Jump to content

Asmodeus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Ασμοδαίος)
For other uses, see Asmodeus (disambiguation).
"Sidonai" redirects here. For the Phoenician city and its inhabitants, see Sidon.
Asmodeus as depicted in Collin de Plancy's Dictionnaire Infernal.

Asmodeus (/ˌæzməˈdiːəs/; Ancient Greek: Ἀσμοδαῖος, Asmodaios) or Ashmedai (/ˈæʃmɪˌdaɪ/; Hebrew: אַשְמְדּאָי, romanized: ʾAšmədāy; Arabic: آشماداي; see below for other variations) is a king of demons in the legends of Solomon and the constructing of Solomon's Temple.[1]

His story features variously in Talmudic stories where he is the king of the shedim. The Quran refers to a "puppet" in the Story of Solomon in Surah Ṣād verses 30-40, which is according to the mufassirūn (authorized exegetes of the Quran) referring to the demon-king Asmodeus (Sakhr).[2]

In Christianity, Asmodeus is mostly known from the deuterocanonical Book of Tobit. He is the primary antagonist and disrupts the marriages of Sarah.[1][3] Peter Binsfeld classifies Asmodeus as the "demon of lust".

Etymology

[edit]
The figure of Asmodeus in Rennes-le-Château.

The name Asmodai is believed to derive from the Avestan *aēšma-daēva (𐬀𐬉𐬴𐬨𐬀𐬛𐬀𐬉𐬎𐬎𐬀*, *aēṣ̌madaēuua), where aēšma means "wrath", and daēva signifies "demon". While the daēva Aēšma is thus Zoroastrianism's demon of wrath and is also well-attested as such, the compound aēšma-daēva is not attested in scripture. It is nonetheless likely that such a form did exist, and that the Book of Tobit's "Asmodaios" (Ἀσμοδαῖος) and the Talmud's "Ashmedai" (אשמדאי) reflect it.[4] In the Zoroastrian and Middle Persian demonology, there did exist the conjuncted form khashm-dev (خشم + دیو), where both terms are cognates.[5]

The spellings Asmoday, Asmodai,[6][7] Asmodee (also Asmodée),[8][9] Osmodeus,[10][11] and Osmodai[12][13] have also been used. The name is alternatively spelled in the bastardized forms (based on the basic consonants אשמדאי, ʾŠMDʾY) Hashmedai (חַשְמְדּאָי, Ḥašməddāy; also Hashmodai, Hasmodai, Khashmodai, Khasmodai),[14][15][16][17] Hammadai (חַמַּדּאָי, Hammaddāy; also Khammadai),[18][19] Shamdon (שַׁמְדּוֹן, Šamdon),[20] and Shidonai (שִׁדֹנאָי, Šīdōnʾāy).[19] Some traditions have subsequently identified Shamdon as the father of Asmodeus.[20]

The Jewish Encyclopedia of 1906 rejects the otherwise accepted etymological relation between the Persian "Æshma-dæva" and Judaism's "Ashmodai" claiming that the particle "-dæva" could not have become "-dai" and that Æshma-dæva as such—a compound name—never appears in Persian sacred texts.

Still, the encyclopedia proposes that the "Asmodeus" from the Apocrypha and the Testament of Solomon are not only related somewhat to Aeshma but have similar behaviour, appearance and roles,[21] to conclude in another article under the entry "Aeshma", in the paragraph "Influence of Persian Beliefs on Judaism",[22] that Persian Zoroastrian beliefs could have heavily influenced Judaism's theology on the long term, bearing in mind that in some texts there are crucial conceptual differences while in others there seems to be a great deal of similarity, proposing a pattern of influence over folk beliefs that would extend further to the mythology itself.

However, the Jewish Encyclopedia asserts that although 'Æshma does not occur in the Avesta in conjunction with dæva, it is probable that a fuller form, such as Æshmo-dæus, has existed, since it is paralleled by the later Pahlavi-form "Khashm-dev"'.[23] Furthermore, it is stated that Asmodeus or Ashmedai "embodies an expression of the influence that the Persian religion or Persian popular beliefs have exercised" on Judaism.[24]

In the texts

[edit]

In the Book of Tobit

[edit]

The Asmodeus of the Book of Tobit is hostile to Sarah, Raguel's daughter,[25] and slays seven successive husbands on their wedding nights, impeding the sexual consummation of the marriages. In the New Jerusalem Bible translation, he is described as "the worst of demons".[26] When the young Tobit is about to marry her, Asmodeus proposes the same fate for him, but Tobit is enabled, through the counsels of his attendant angel Raphael, to render him innocuous. By placing a fish's heart and liver on red-hot cinders, Tobit produces a smoky vapour that causes the demon to flee to Egypt, where Raphael binds him.[27] According to some translations,[which?] Asmodeus is strangled.[citation needed]

Perhaps Asmodeus punishes the suitors for their carnal desire, since Tobit prays to be free from such desire and is kept safe. Asmodeus is also described as an evil spirit in general: "Ασμοδαίος τὸ πονηρὸν δαιμόνιον or τὸ δαιμόνιον πονηρόν, and πνεῦμα ἀκάθαρτον".[28][29][25][30]

In the Talmud

[edit]

The figure of Ashmedai in the Talmud is less malign in character than the Asmodeus of Tobit. In the former, he appears repeatedly in the light of a good-natured and humorous fellow. But besides that, there is one feature in which he parallels Asmodeus, in as much as his desires turn upon Bathsheba and later Solomon's wives.

Another Talmudic legend has King Solomon tricking Asmodeus into collaborating in the construction of Solomon's Temple[31] (see: The Story of King Solomon and Ashmedai).

Another legend depicts Asmodeus throwing King Solomon over 400 leagues away from the capital by putting one wing on the ground and the other stretched skyward. He then changed places for some years with King Solomon. When King Solomon returned, Asmodeus fled from his wrath.[32] Similar legends can be found in Islamic lore. Asmodeus is referred to as Sakhr (Arabic: صخر the Rock or the Stony One), because Solomon banished him into a rock, after he takes his kingdom back from him. He is considered to be a king of the divs or ifrits.[33][page needed]

Another passage describes him as marrying Lilith, who became his queen.[34]

In the Testament of Solomon

[edit]

In the Testament of Solomon, a 1st–3rd century text, the king invokes Asmodeus to aid in the construction of the Temple. The demon appears and predicts Solomon's kingdom will one day be divided (Testament of Solomon, verse 21–25).[35] When Solomon interrogates Asmodeus further, the king learns that Asmodeus is thwarted by the angel Raphael, as well as by sheatfish found in the rivers of Assyria. He also admits to hating water. Asmodeus claims that he was born of a human mother and an angel father.

In the Malleus Maleficarum

[edit]

In the Malleus Maleficarum (1486), Asmodeus was considered the demon of lust.[36] Sebastien Michaelis said that his adversary is St. John. Some demonologists of the 16th century assigned a month to a demon and considered November to be the month in which Asmodeus's power was strongest. Other demonologists asserted that his zodiacal sign was Aquarius but only between January 30 and February 8.

He has 72 legions of demons under his command. He is one of the Kings of Hell under Lucifer the emperor. He incites gambling, and is the overseer of all the gambling houses in the court of Hell. Some Catholic theologians compared him with Abaddon. Yet other authors considered Asmodeus a prince of revenge.

In the Dictionnaire Infernal

[edit]

The Dictionnaire Infernal (1818) by Collin de Plancy portrays Asmodeus with the breast of a man, a cock leg, serpent tail, three heads (one of a man spitting fire, one of a sheep, and one of a bull), riding a lion with dragon wings and neck - all of these creatures being associated with either lascivity, lust or revenge in some cultures.[citation needed] The Archbishop of Paris[which?] approved the portrait.[37]

In the Lesser Key of Solomon

[edit]

Asmodeus appears as the king 'Asmoday' in the Ars Goetia, where he is said to have a seal in gold and is listed as number thirty-two according to respective rank.[38]

He "is strong, powerful and appears with three heads; the first is like a bull, the second like a man, and the third like a ram or a goat; the tail of a serpent, and from his mouth issue flames of fire."[39] Also, he sits upon an infernal dragon, holds a lance with a banner and, amongst the Legions of Amaymon, Asmoday governs seventy-two legions of inferior spirits.[38]

In The Magus

[edit]

Asmodeus is referred to in Book Two, Chapter Eight of The Magus (1801) by Francis Barrett.[40]

Later depictions

[edit]

In Christian thought

[edit]

Asmodeus was named in the Order of Thrones by Gregory the Great.[41]

Asmodeus was cited by the nuns of Loudun in the Loudun possessions of 1634.[42]

Asmodeus' reputation as the personification of lust continued into later writings, as he was known as the "Prince of Lechery" in the 16th-century romance Friar Rush.[43] The French Benedictine Augustin Calmet equated his name with a fine dress.[43] The 1409 Lollard manuscript titled Lanterne of Light associated Asmodeus with the deadly sin of lust. The 16th-century Dutch demonologist Johann Weyer described him as the banker at the baccarat table in hell, and overseer of earthly gambling houses.[44]

In 1641, the Spanish playwright and novelist Luis Velez de Guevara published the satirical novel El diablo cojuelo, where Asmodeus is represented as a mischievous demon endowed with a playful and satirical genius. The plot presents a rascal student that hides in an astrologer's mansard. He frees a devil from a bottle. As an acknowledgement the devil shows him the apartments of Madrid and the tricks, miseries and mischiefs of their inhabitants.[45][46] The French novelist Alain-René Lesage adapted the Spanish source in his 1707 novel le Diable boiteux,[43] where he likened him to Cupid. In the book, he is rescued from an enchanted glass bottle by a Spanish student Don Cleophas Leandro Zambullo. Grateful, he joins with the young man on a series of adventures before being recaptured. Asmodeus is portrayed in a sympathetic light as good-natured, and a canny satirist and critic of human society.[43] In another episode Asmodeus takes Don Cleophas for a night flight, and removes the roofs from the houses of a village to show him the secrets of what passes in private lives. Following Lesage's work, he was depicted in a number of novels and periodicals, mainly in France but also London and New York.[47]

Asmodeus was widely depicted as having a handsome visage, good manners and an engaging nature; however, he was portrayed as walking with a limp and one leg was either clawed or that of a rooster. He walks aided by two walking sticks in Lesage's work, and this gave rise to the English title The Devil on Two Sticks[37] (also later translated The Limping Devil and The Lame Devil). Lesage attributes his lameness to falling from the sky after fighting with another devil.[48]

On 18 February 1865, author Evert A. Duyckinck sent President Abraham Lincoln a letter, apparently mailed from Quincy. Duyckinck signed the letter "Asmodeus", with his initials below his pseudonym. His letter enclosed a newspaper clipping about an inappropriate joke allegedly told by Lincoln at the Hampton Roads Peace Conference. The purpose of Duyckinck's letter was to advise Lincoln of "an important omission" about the history of the conference. He advised that the newspaper clipping be added to the "Archives of the Nation".[49]

In the Kabbalah

[edit]

According to the Kabbalah and the school of Shlomo ibn Aderet, Asmodeus is born as the result of a union between Agrat bat Mahlat and King David.[50]

In the Treatise on the Left Emanation, which describes sitra achra (Aramaic: סטרא אחרא), meaning the "other side" or the "side of evil", Asmodeus is described as a figure living in the third ether of Heaven. He is Samael's subordinate, and married to a younger or alternative form of Lilith (Samael is married to the older Lilith). Asmodeus is still able to inflict pain and destruction, but only on Mondays.[51]

Islam

[edit]
Solomon and the Queen of Sheba informed by an angel about their child, possibly an allusion to Nizami's Tale of the Princess of the Yellow-Gold Pavillion. A red demon enslaved in the garden, pressumably Asmodeus, is forced to work.

In Islamic culture, Asmodeus is known as a demon (Arabic: شَيَاطِين, romanized: šayṭān Persian: دیو, romanized: dīv) called Sakhr (rock), probably a reference to his fate being imprisoned inside a box of rock, chained with iron and thrown into the sea.[52] or his association with the desires of the lower world. He features prominently as the antagonist of the prophet Solomon. He is sometimes identified with the ifrit who offered to carry the Throne of Solomon.[53] In the story of Buluqiya,[who?][clarification needed] Asmodeus teaches a young Jewish prince about the seven layers of hell.[citation needed]

Quran and exegesis

[edit]
Angels fighting to hold a demonic dragon in chains. On the left side of the picture, the head of Asmodeus lurks from a crag of the demonic manifestation. The image conveys the battle between the demonic passions and the rational intellect in the form of the angels, supposedly happening inside a human's heart. Siyah Qalam (1478)

Islamic exegesis (tafsīr) commentary about Asmodeus are abundant in Medieval Islam. Asmodeus became a central figure in of the Quranic Ṣād verse 38:34: "We allowed Solomon to be seduced by temptation, and we cast a body upon his seat. Then he repented."[54] Tabari (224–310 AH; 839–923 AD) identifies the body mentioned in the verse as a shaytan in both his Annals of al-Tabari[55] as well as his tafsir.[56]

Various classical era Islamic scholars has recorded several names for the demon works for the similar verse:[57]

  • Ibn Abbas, Qatada ibn Di'ama, and Tabari traditions has recorded the name of the demon as Sakhr.[57]
    • Addendum from Ibn Abbas, the demon are considered one of Ifrit jinn.[58]
      • Qatada said Sakhr is a giant demon of sea.[59]
  • Mujahid ibn Jabr recorded the name of the demon as Asif.
  • Mujahid also recorded another traditions which named the demon as Asruwa.
  • as-Suddi recorded the name of the demon as Habyaq.
  • Ibn Dhakwan recorded the name of the demon as Kudhī.[58]

Abd al-Razzaq Kāshānī comments on the same verse, "The satan who sat thereupon [sovereignity's throne] and took its ring away, represents the elemental earthly nature, ruler over the lower sea of matter, called Sakhr, the 'rock,' on account of its inclination toward the lowest things and clinging thereto, even as a stone on account of heaviness."[60]

Aziz ad-Din Nasafi [fa] depicts Solomon as caliph, a symbol of the ruling intellect, whose task it is to reduce the physical passions to proper obedience, else the forces will capture the mind's seat and turn into an usurping demon.[61] Solomon's ring signifies the imperial command over the forces of nature, while Solomon's lapse into lust and idolatry caused him to lose.[61]

Attar of Nishapur elucidates a similar allegory: one must behave like a triumphant 'Solomon' and chain the demons of the nafs or lower self, locking the demon-prince into a 'rock', before the rūḥ (soul) can make the first steps to the Divine.[62][63]

Narrative exegesis

[edit]

The main structures of the story about king Solomon and Sakhr the demon mainly built around Qur'an chapters Ṣād 38:34-36[59] and An-Naml 27:38-40, along with various Hadiths related to the texts.[58][57]

Supplementary materials which usually included in Stories of the Prophets (Qiṣaṣ al-Anbiyāʾ) give various reasons for Solomon's punishment and Asmodeus' consequently temporary victory; sometimes because of acting injustly before a family dispute or hands the ring to a demon in exchange for knowledge, while most sources (such as Tabari, ʿUmāra ibn Wathīma, Abu Ishaq al-Tha'labi, ibn Asakir, ibn al-Athir) invoke the idea that one of his wives committed idolatry.[64] However, Ibn Kathir has recorded the words from Sulaiman al-Aʽmash, that Ibn Abbas has told him this kind of narration were sourced from the People of the Book (Judaism or Christian priests), neither from Quranic revelation or from Hadith.[59]

When Asmodeus put the ring on his finger, he turned into the shape of Solomon and sat on his throne, ruling in wickedness, while the real Solomon emerged from his bath and not recognized by anyone in the palace, thus cast into the streets to wander as a beggar. Finally Solomon found work at a harbor, gutting fish. Yahya ibn Abi `Amr al-Shaybani said that Solomon has found his ring in Ashkelon.[59] After 40 days the false Solomon's evil ways aroused suspicion and the royal minister Asaph recites some holy verses in the presence of the demon king, who screamed in rage, unable to bear the recitation, and tore of the ring. The ring then fell into a river and was swallowed by a fish. The fish eventually arrived at the table of the real Solomon who slipped the ring back on and was immediately surrounded by loyal jinn who carried him to his throne, where he and his army of men, jinn, birds, and beasts battle Asmodeus and locked him in a stone after his defeat.[65] After Solomon's rule has restored, Solomon prayed to Allah to grant him the power to rule which no one can rival to usurp as long as Solomon lived, just like Sakhr did before, which was granted.[59] This narratives of Asmodeus impersonating Solomon was rejected by Al-Qurtubi, since al-Qurtubi reasoned according to one Hadith, no devils such as Asmodeus could impersonate any Prophets and messengers in Islam physically, including Solomon.[66]

The book of Ma‘ālim al-Tanzīl or also more known as Tafsir al-Baghawi, has recorded classical Islamic narratives that Sakhr (Asmodeus) once offered Solomon to brought him the throne of queen of Sheba before noon,[67][58] where the distance between the Kingdom of Israel which Solomon ruled with the kingdom of Sheba were two month of journey by normal means. Solomon responded by saying he wanted faster than Sakhr could do. Then another figure offered that he can bring the throne of Sheba in a blink of an eye. which Solomon agreed to. There are two versions regarding the figure who perform the deed. The first version said it was archangel Gabriel. However, the majority of classical chroniclers of tafsir said it was Asif ibn Barkhiya, aide of Solomon[a]. Then as the Asif done moving the throne of Sheba in an instant through his miraculous prayer, Solomon prostrated in his grateful to Allah for the miracle bestowed to Asif.[70]

Folk-Literature

[edit]

The idea of "Genie in a bottle" probably roots in the Islamic legend about the demon Asmodeus.[71] In a story of Thousand and One Nights, the "Tale of the City of Brass" refers to Asmodeus' fate after his failure against the Prophet. According to this story, travelers discover the demon locked in a stone in the middle of the desert. The story goes as follows according to Sir Richard Burton:

Then they came upon a pillar of black stone like a furnace chimney wherein was one sunken up to his armpits. He had two great wings and four arms, two of them like the arms of the sons of Adam and other two as they were lions' paws, with claws of iron, and he was black and tall and frightful of aspect, with hair like horses' tails and eyes like blazing coals, slit upright in his face."

In the essay on the Arabic "Tale of the City of Brass", Andras Hamori relied only on incomplete versions of the story without mentioning the name of the demon.[72]

In the story of Sakhr and Buluqiya, a young Jewish prince searching for the final Prophet (Muhammad), Sakhr is said to have reached immortality by drinking from the Well of Immortality. When Buluqiya arrives in an island during his search for Muhammad, he is greeted by two snakes as big as camels and palm trees, glorifying the name of God and Muhammad. They explain that they are tasked with punishing the residents of hell. Later on a different island, he meets Asmodeus the king of demons, who explains the seven layers (ṭabaqāt) and the punisher angels (zabāniyya) who sire hell's snakes and scorpions by self-copulation.[73]

[edit]

In an episode of Polish sitcom The Lousy World titled "Nie bój żaby" (2000) Asmodeus is summoned by Mariola in the form of Postman Edzio. Asmodeus is played by Bohdan Smoleń.[74]

In the 2021 movie Paranormal Activity: Next of Kin, Asmodeus appears as an antagonist.[75]

On October 3, 2021, an episode of the web series Puppet History mentioned Asmodeus's naming in the Loudun Possessions, and a three-headed puppet rendition of Asmodeus both performed the episode's customary ending song and featured in the episode's plot-heavy finale.[76]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Footnotes

[edit]
  1. ^ Theorized as Islamic parallel of Asaph the Jew figure.[68][69]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^ a b "Asmodeus" in The New Encyclopædia Britannica. Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica Inc., 15th edn., 1992, Vol. 1, p. 635.
  2. ^ Nünlist, T. (2015). Dämonenglaube im Islam. Deutschland: De Gruyter. p. 156 (German)
  3. ^ "Asmodeus/Asmoday". Judeo-Christian Demons. Deliriumsrealm.com. 25 March 2003. Retrieved 2009-03-04.
  4. ^ Stave, Erik (2002) [1901–1906]. "Æshma (Asmodeus, Ashmedai)". In Singer, Isidore; Adler, Cyrus; et al. (eds.). Jewish Encyclopedia. New York: Funk & Wagnalls. LCCN 16-014703. Retrieved 7 March 2018. since it is paralleled by the later Pahlavi-form "Khashm-dev" ("Khashm dev" = "Æshma dev"), written with the Aramaic "sheda," but pronounced "dev." [..] Asmodeus (Ashmedai) embodies an expression of the influence that the Persian religion or Persian popular beliefs have exercised on the Jewish—an influence that shows itself very prominently in the domain of demonology.
  5. ^ Bane, Theresa (Jan 9, 2012). McFarland (ed.). Encyclopedia of Demons in World Religions and Cultures. McFarland. p. 191. ISBN 978-0-786-46360-2.
  6. ^ Milton, John (1671). Paradise Regained.
  7. ^ Pomfret, John (1724). "Cruelty and Lust". Poems Upon Several Occasions. D. Brown. p. 73.
  8. ^ Mauriac, François (1939). Asmodee; or, The Intruder. Secker & Warburg.
  9. ^ Kleu, Michael; Eayrs, Madelene (2010). Who Are You?. USA: Xulon Press. p. 214. ISBN 978-1-61579-841-4.
  10. ^ Connell, Evan S. (1992). The Alchymist's Journal. Penguin Books. p. 110. ISBN 0-14-016932-6.
  11. ^ Guppy, Henry (1960). "Tobit". Bulletin of the John Rylands Library. Vol. 42. Manchester University Press. p. 375.
  12. ^ Garibay Mora, Ernesto (2005). Dictionary of Demons and Related Concepts. Miami, Florida: L. D. Books. p. 103. ISBN 970-732-108-3.
  13. ^ Nares, Robert (1888). A Glossary of Words, Phrases, Names, and Allusions. London: Reeves & Turner. p. 21.
  14. ^ Association of Modern Austrian Philologists (1999). Moderne Sprachen. Vol. 43. p. 63.
  15. ^ Ritchie, Leitch (1836). The Magician. Vol. I. Philadelphia: Carey, Lea & Blanchard. p. 84.
  16. ^ de Laurence, L. W. (1914). The Great Book of Magical Art, Hindu Magic and East Indian Occultism. Chicago: The de Laurence Co. p. 183.
  17. ^ MacGregor Mathers, S. L. (1458). The Book of the Sacred Magic. Kessinger. p. 110. ISBN 9781425454142.
  18. ^ Voltaire (1824). A Philosophical Dictionary. Vol. 1. London: J. & H. L. Hunt. p. 286.
  19. ^ a b Leland, Charles Godfrey (1902). Flaxius: Leaves from the Life of an Immortal. London: Philip Wellby. p. 72.
  20. ^ a b "Asmodeus, or Ashmedai". Jewish Encyclopedia. Funk and Wagnalls. 1906. Retrieved May 1, 2013.
  21. ^ Jewish encyclopedia 1906 full text unedited version , entry "Asmodeus" paragraph "Asmodeus, Ashmedai, and Æshma."
  22. ^ Stave, E., Æshma (Asmodeus, Ashmedai), Jewish Encyclopedia, unedited full text 1906 version
  23. ^ Strave, Erik. "Æshma (Asmodeus) etymology in Jewish Encyclopedia". Though "Æshma" does not occur in the Avesta in conjunction with "dæva", it is probable that a fuller form, such as "Æshmo-dæus", has existed, since it is paralleled by the later Pahlavi-form "Khashm-dev" ("Khashm dev" = "Æshma dev"), written with the Aramaic "sheda," but pronounced "dev."
  24. ^ Ibid. Jewish Encyclopedia. In fine, Asmodeus (Ashmedai) embodies an expression of the influence that the Persian religion or Persian popular beliefs have exercised on the Jewish—an influence that shows itself very prominently in the domain of demonology. Thus 'Ασμο' ... corresponds to "Æshma", and the ending δαῖος ... to "dæva".
  25. ^ a b "Tobit 6:13". bible.oremus.org. Retrieved 2024-05-22.
  26. ^ "Tobit 3". Catholic Online. Retrieved 2024-05-22.
  27. ^ "Tobit 8:2–3". bible.oremus.org. Retrieved 2024-05-22.
  28. ^ "Tobit 3:8". bible.oremus.org. Retrieved 2024-05-22.
  29. ^ "Tobit 3:17". bible.oremus.org. Retrieved 2024-05-22.
  30. ^ "Tobit 8:3". bible.oremus.org. Retrieved 2024-05-22.
  31. ^ Raphael Patai Encyclopedia of Jewish Folklore and Traditions Routledge 2015 ISBN 978-1-317-47170-7 page 39
  32. ^ Talmud. Gittin. pp. 68b.
  33. ^ Robert Lebling Legends of the Fire Spirits: Jinn and Genies from Arabia to Zanzibar I.B.Tauris 2010 ISBN 978-0-857-73063-3[page needed]
  34. ^ Schwartz, Howard (1988). Lilith's cave: Jewish tales of the supernatural. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row. p. 8. ISBN 978-0-06-250779-2. LCCN 87045196. OCLC 62241318.
  35. ^ Conybeare, Frederick Cornwallis (trans.) (October 1898). "The Testament of Solomon". The Jewish Quarterly Review. 11 (1): 1–45. doi:10.2307/1450398. ISSN 0021-6682. JSTOR 1450398. Retrieved 2012-02-09.
  36. ^ Kramer, Heinrich; Summers, Montague (trans.). "Question IV: By which Devils are the Operations of Incubus and Succubus Practised?". Malleus Maleficarum Part 1 Question IV. Vol. 1. London, England: J. Rodker. LCCN 29017069. OCLC 504248484. But the very devil of Fornication, and the chief of that abomination, is called Asmodeus, which means the Creature of Judgement: for because of this kind of sin a terrible judgement was executed upon Sodom and the four other cities.
  37. ^ a b Rudwin 1970, p. 93.
  38. ^ a b Mathers & Crowley 1995, pp. 68–70.
  39. ^ Mathers & Crowley 1995, p. 32.
  40. ^ Barrett, Francis (2008) [1801]. "VIII: The Annoyance of Evil Spirits, and the Preservation we have from Good Spirits". The Magus, a Complete System of Occult Philosophy. Vol. Book II. New York: Cosimo Classics. pp. 49–52. ISBN 978-1-60520-301-0. LCCN 11015009. OCLC 428109956. Archived from the original on 2011-07-28. Retrieved 2010-09-28.
  41. ^ Rudwin 1970, p. 20.
  42. ^ Dumas, Alexandre (1634). "Urbain Grandier: Chapter V". Urbain Grandier. Celebrated Crimes.
  43. ^ a b c d Rudwin 1970, p. 87.
  44. ^ Rudwin 1970, p. 92.
  45. ^ Luis Vélez de Guevara
  46. ^ "Luis Vélez de Guevara | Spanish author".
  47. ^ Rudwin 1970, p. 88.
  48. ^ Rudwin 1970, p. 50.
  49. ^ Duyckinck, Evert A. Evert A. Duyckinck to Abraham Lincoln, Saturday, February 18, 1865 (Sends clipping with story Lincoln allegedly told at Hampton Roads conference) – The Abraham Lincoln Papers at the Library of Congress. Archived from the original on February 22, 2013. Retrieved February 3, 2013.
  50. ^ Scholem, G. (1948). "New Chapters in the Story of Ashmedai and Lilith / פרקים חדשים מענייני אשמדאי ולילית". Tarbiẕ. 19 (3–4). Mandel Institute for Jewish Studies: 160–175. JSTOR 23585831.
  51. ^ "ASMODEUS | Encyclopedia of Jewish Folklore and Traditions - Credo Reference".
  52. ^ Sami Helewa Models of Leadership in the Adab Narratives of Joseph, David, and Solomon: Lament for the Sacred Lexington Books 2017 ISBN 978-1-498-55267-7 page 167
  53. ^ Eichler, Paul Arno. "Die Dschinn, Teufel und Engel im Koran." (1928). p. 19
  54. ^ Lewisohn, L., Shackle, C. (2006). Attar and the Persian Sufi Tradition: The Art of Spiritual Flight. Vereinigtes Königreich: Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 153
  55. ^ Nünlist, T. (2015). Dämonenglaube im Islam. Deutschland: De Gruyter. p. 156 (German)
  56. ^ "موقع التفير الكبير".
  57. ^ a b c Miftah H. Yusufpati (2023). "Peristiwa Muharam: Kisah Jin Sakhr Melakukan Kudeta di Kerajaan Nabi Sulaiman" [Muharram Incident: The Story of Sakhr Jinn Carrying Out a Coup in the Kingdom of Prophet Sulaiman] (in Indonesian). Media Nusantara Citra. Koran Sindo. pp. 1–2. Retrieved 21 August 2024. References from:
  58. ^ a b c d "تفسير: (قَالَ عِفْرِيتٌ مِنَ الْجِنِّ أَنَا آتِيكَ بِهِ قَبْلَ أَنْ تَقُومَ مِنْ مَقَامِكَ... )" [Interpretation: (An Ifrit from among the jinn said, "I will bring it to you before you rise from your place...")]. alukah.net (in Arabic). الألوكة. 2022. Retrieved 24 August 2024.
  59. ^ a b c d e Ibn Kathir (1988). Ali Baidoun, Muhammad (ed.). تفسير ابن كثير (تفسير القرآن العظيم) 1-4 ج4 [Tafsir Ibn Kathir (Interpretation of the Great Qur’an) 1-4 Vol. 4 (First published in 1971)] (in Arabic). دار الكتب العلمية. p. 31-32. Retrieved 24 August 2024. Ṣād 34, Ṣād 35
  60. ^ Brend, Barbara. "Figurative Art in Medieval Islam and the Riddle of Bihzād of Herāt (1465–1535). By Michael Barry. pp. 408. Paris, Flammarion, 2004." Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 17.1 (2007): 357
  61. ^ a b Brend, Barbara. "Figurative Art in Medieval Islam and the Riddle of Bihzād of Herāt (1465–1535). By Michael Barry. p. 357. Paris, Flammarion, 2004." Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 17.1 (2007): 357
  62. ^ Lewisohn, L., Shackle, C. (2006). Attar and the Persian Sufi Tradition: The Art of Spiritual Flight. Vereinigtes Königreich: Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 156
  63. ^ Brend, Barbara. "Figurative Art in Medieval Islam and the Riddle of Bihzād of Herāt (1465–1535). By Michael Barry. p. 360. Paris, Flammarion, 2004." Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 17.1 (2007): 360
  64. ^ Klar, M. O., and ﻣ. . کلار. “And We Cast upon His Throne a Mere Body: A Historiographical Reading of Q. 38:34 /" وألقينا على کرسيه جسدا ": قراءة تاريخية لآية 34 من سورة ص .” Journal of Qur’anic Studies, vol. 6, no. 1, 2004, pp. 103–26. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/25728129. Accessed 5 Mar. 2023.
  65. ^ Brend, Barbara. "Figurative Art in Medieval Islam and the Riddle of Bihzād of Herāt (1465–1535). By Michael Barry. p. 355. Paris, Flammarion, 2004." Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 17.1 (2007): 355
  66. ^ al-Qurtubi. "تفسير القرطبي" [Interpretation of al-Qurtubi]. islamweb.net (in Arabic). islamweb. p. 178, chapter 15. Retrieved 29 August 2024.
  67. ^ Al-Baghawi (2023). "6". In Abdullah Al-Nimr, Muhammad; Jum'a ad-Damiriya, Uthman; Muslim Al-Harsh, Sulaiman (eds.). تفسير البغوي [Tafsir al-Baghawi] (in Arabic). دار طيبة. p. 165. Retrieved 24 August 2024.
  68. ^ James Prinsep (1845). The Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal. Ed. by James Prinsep, Volume 14. Bapt. Miss. Press. p. 447. Retrieved 24 August 2024.
  69. ^ Nancy E. Berg; Marc Saperstein (2024). Exile and the Jews: Literature, History, and Identity. U of Nebraska Press. p. 244. ISBN 978-0827619197. Retrieved 24 August 2024.
  70. ^ Al-Baghawi (2023). "6". In Abdullah Al-Nimr, Muhammad; Jum'a ad-Damiriya, Uthman; Muslim Al-Harsh, Sulaiman (eds.). تفسير البغوي [Tafsir al-Baghawi] (in Arabic). دار طيبة. p. 165. Retrieved 24 August 2024.
  71. ^ The Book of Sindibād Or The Story of the King, His Son, the Damsel, and the Seven Vazīrs: From the Persian and Arabic. (1884). Vereinigtes Königreich: J. Cameron. p. 18
  72. ^ Brend, Barbara. "Figurative Art in Medieval Islam and the Riddle of Bihzād of Herāt (1465–1535). By Michael Barry. pp. 408. Paris, Flammarion, 2004." Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 17.1 (2007): 64-68.
  73. ^ Christian Lange Locating Hell in Islamic Traditions BRILL 978-90-04-30121-4 p. 118
  74. ^ Lonzio (2013-02-09). "073 Nie bój żaby". Kiepscy.org.pl (in Polish). Retrieved 2023-12-19.
  75. ^ "Paranormal Activity: Next of Kin: Is the Demon Asmodeus Real? History Explained". Screen Rant. 31 October 2021.
  76. ^ "The Demonic Possessions of Loudun • Puppet History". YouTube. 3 October 2021.

Secondary sources

[edit]
[edit]
  • Media related to Asmodeus at Wikimedia Commons
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Asmodeus&oldid=1254337526"